停放的电动滑板车造成的混乱:专用空间的影响

Katrine Karlsen, Petr Pokorny, Espen Johnsson, Aslak Fyhri
{"title":"停放的电动滑板车造成的混乱:专用空间的影响","authors":"Katrine Karlsen,&nbsp;Petr Pokorny,&nbsp;Espen Johnsson,&nbsp;Aslak Fyhri","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared e-scooters are popular, but improperly parked e-scooters impede access for pedestrians. Policymakers need knowledge about the impact and limitations of parking measures to reduce clutter. This paper evaluates pilots that introduced dedicated e-scooter parking places in areas with free-floating parking. Parking racks were implemented in a borough in Oslo, while painted spaces were introduced in the city centres of Oslo and Trondheim. The parking measures were evaluated using video recordings, GPS-data and surveys. Results show that about two thirds of riders ending their trip in the vicinity of a parking measure park in or near the measure. The parking becomes more concentrated around the measures and there is a clear reduction in the share of e-scooters in the area that impede access for pedestrians. The large variations from site to site indicate that the exact placement of the parking measure is important. The effect of voluntary parking measures is greatest in the immediate vicinity and appears to fade away about 70 m from the measures. Non-riders experience parked e-scooter as an obstacle to a significantly greater extent than riders do, and there was no significant decrease in perceptions of e-scooters as an obstacle after a parking rack was placed. Overall, voluntary parking measures appear to improve parking behaviour in the immediate vicinity, but do not eliminate problematic parking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clutter from parked e-scooters: Effects of dedicated spaces\",\"authors\":\"Katrine Karlsen,&nbsp;Petr Pokorny,&nbsp;Espen Johnsson,&nbsp;Aslak Fyhri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shared e-scooters are popular, but improperly parked e-scooters impede access for pedestrians. Policymakers need knowledge about the impact and limitations of parking measures to reduce clutter. This paper evaluates pilots that introduced dedicated e-scooter parking places in areas with free-floating parking. Parking racks were implemented in a borough in Oslo, while painted spaces were introduced in the city centres of Oslo and Trondheim. The parking measures were evaluated using video recordings, GPS-data and surveys. Results show that about two thirds of riders ending their trip in the vicinity of a parking measure park in or near the measure. The parking becomes more concentrated around the measures and there is a clear reduction in the share of e-scooters in the area that impede access for pedestrians. The large variations from site to site indicate that the exact placement of the parking measure is important. The effect of voluntary parking measures is greatest in the immediate vicinity and appears to fade away about 70 m from the measures. Non-riders experience parked e-scooter as an obstacle to a significantly greater extent than riders do, and there was no significant decrease in perceptions of e-scooters as an obstacle after a parking rack was placed. Overall, voluntary parking measures appear to improve parking behaviour in the immediate vicinity, but do not eliminate problematic parking.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295010592500035X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295010592500035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共享电动滑板车很受欢迎,但停放不当的电动滑板车阻碍了行人的通行。政策制定者需要了解停车措施的影响和局限性,以减少混乱。本文对在自由浮动停车场引入电动滑板车专用停车位的试点进行了评价。在奥斯陆的一个自治市镇安装了停车架,而在奥斯陆和特隆赫姆的市中心引入了彩色空间。通过录像、gps数据和调查对停车措施进行了评估。结果显示,大约三分之二的乘客在停车措施附近停车或在该措施附近停车。停车场变得更加集中在这些措施周围,阻碍行人通行的电动滑板车的比例明显减少。不同地点之间的巨大差异表明停车措施的确切位置很重要。自愿停车措施的效果在邻近地区最大,并在措施实施70 m后逐渐消失。与骑车者相比,不骑车者将停放的电动滑板车视为障碍的程度要大得多,而且在放置停放架后,将电动滑板车视为障碍的感觉并没有显著下降。总的来说,自愿停车措施似乎改善了附近地区的停车行为,但并没有消除停车问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clutter from parked e-scooters: Effects of dedicated spaces
Shared e-scooters are popular, but improperly parked e-scooters impede access for pedestrians. Policymakers need knowledge about the impact and limitations of parking measures to reduce clutter. This paper evaluates pilots that introduced dedicated e-scooter parking places in areas with free-floating parking. Parking racks were implemented in a borough in Oslo, while painted spaces were introduced in the city centres of Oslo and Trondheim. The parking measures were evaluated using video recordings, GPS-data and surveys. Results show that about two thirds of riders ending their trip in the vicinity of a parking measure park in or near the measure. The parking becomes more concentrated around the measures and there is a clear reduction in the share of e-scooters in the area that impede access for pedestrians. The large variations from site to site indicate that the exact placement of the parking measure is important. The effect of voluntary parking measures is greatest in the immediate vicinity and appears to fade away about 70 m from the measures. Non-riders experience parked e-scooter as an obstacle to a significantly greater extent than riders do, and there was no significant decrease in perceptions of e-scooters as an obstacle after a parking rack was placed. Overall, voluntary parking measures appear to improve parking behaviour in the immediate vicinity, but do not eliminate problematic parking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信