{"title":"评估人工智能的生命周期经济学:人工智能的平均成本(LCOAI)","authors":"Eliseo Curcio","doi":"10.1016/j.is.2025.102634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes foundational to enterprise infrastructure, organizations face growing challenges in accurately assessing the full economic implications of AI deployment. Existing metrics such as API token costs, GPU-hour billing, or Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) fail to capture the complete lifecycle costs of AI systems and provide limited comparability across deployment models. This paper introduces the Levelized Cost of Artificial Intelligence (LCOAI), a standardized economic metric designed to quantify the total capital (CAPEX) and operational (OPEX) expenditures per unit of productive AI output, normalized by valid inference volume. Analogous to established metrics like the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) in the energy sector, LCOAI provides a rigorous, transparent framework for evaluating and comparing AI deployment strategies. We define the LCOAI methodology in detail and apply it to four representative scenarios OpenAI GPT-4.1 API, Anthropic Claude Haiku API, a self-hosted LLaMA-2–13B deployment, and a cloud-hosted LLaMA-2–13B deployment demonstrating how LCOAI captures critical trade-offs in scalability, investment planning, and cost optimization. Extensive sensitivity analyses further explore the impact of inference volume, CAPEX, and OPEX variability on lifecycle economics. The results illustrate the practical utility of LCOAI in procurement, infrastructure planning, and automation strategy, and establish it as a foundational benchmark for AI economic analysis. Policy implications and directions for future refinement, including integration of environmental and performance-adjusted cost metrics, are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50363,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 102634"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the lifecycle economics of AI: The levelized cost of artificial intelligence (LCOAI)\",\"authors\":\"Eliseo Curcio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.is.2025.102634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes foundational to enterprise infrastructure, organizations face growing challenges in accurately assessing the full economic implications of AI deployment. Existing metrics such as API token costs, GPU-hour billing, or Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) fail to capture the complete lifecycle costs of AI systems and provide limited comparability across deployment models. This paper introduces the Levelized Cost of Artificial Intelligence (LCOAI), a standardized economic metric designed to quantify the total capital (CAPEX) and operational (OPEX) expenditures per unit of productive AI output, normalized by valid inference volume. Analogous to established metrics like the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) in the energy sector, LCOAI provides a rigorous, transparent framework for evaluating and comparing AI deployment strategies. We define the LCOAI methodology in detail and apply it to four representative scenarios OpenAI GPT-4.1 API, Anthropic Claude Haiku API, a self-hosted LLaMA-2–13B deployment, and a cloud-hosted LLaMA-2–13B deployment demonstrating how LCOAI captures critical trade-offs in scalability, investment planning, and cost optimization. Extensive sensitivity analyses further explore the impact of inference volume, CAPEX, and OPEX variability on lifecycle economics. The results illustrate the practical utility of LCOAI in procurement, infrastructure planning, and automation strategy, and establish it as a foundational benchmark for AI economic analysis. Policy implications and directions for future refinement, including integration of environmental and performance-adjusted cost metrics, are also discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems\",\"volume\":\"136 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437925001206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306437925001206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着人工智能(AI)成为企业基础设施的基础,企业在准确评估AI部署的全部经济影响方面面临着越来越大的挑战。现有的指标,如API令牌成本、gpu小时计费或总拥有成本(TCO),无法捕捉人工智能系统的完整生命周期成本,并且在部署模型之间提供有限的可比性。本文介绍了人工智能的平准化成本(LCOAI),这是一种标准化的经济指标,旨在量化每单位生产性人工智能产出的总资本(CAPEX)和运营(OPEX)支出,并通过有效推理量进行规范化。与能源领域的平准化电力成本(LCOE)和氢平准化成本(LCOH)等既定指标类似,LCOAI为评估和比较人工智能部署策略提供了一个严格、透明的框架。我们详细定义了LCOAI方法,并将其应用于四个代表性场景:OpenAI GPT-4.1 API、Anthropic Claude Haiku API、自托管LLaMA-2-13B部署和云托管LLaMA-2-13B部署,展示了LCOAI如何在可扩展性、投资规划和成本优化方面实现关键权衡。广泛的敏感性分析进一步探讨了推理量、CAPEX和OPEX可变性对生命周期经济学的影响。结果说明了LCOAI在采购、基础设施规划和自动化战略中的实际效用,并将其建立为人工智能经济分析的基础基准。还讨论了未来改进的政策影响和方向,包括环境和绩效调整成本指标的整合。
Evaluating the lifecycle economics of AI: The levelized cost of artificial intelligence (LCOAI)
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes foundational to enterprise infrastructure, organizations face growing challenges in accurately assessing the full economic implications of AI deployment. Existing metrics such as API token costs, GPU-hour billing, or Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) fail to capture the complete lifecycle costs of AI systems and provide limited comparability across deployment models. This paper introduces the Levelized Cost of Artificial Intelligence (LCOAI), a standardized economic metric designed to quantify the total capital (CAPEX) and operational (OPEX) expenditures per unit of productive AI output, normalized by valid inference volume. Analogous to established metrics like the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) and the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) in the energy sector, LCOAI provides a rigorous, transparent framework for evaluating and comparing AI deployment strategies. We define the LCOAI methodology in detail and apply it to four representative scenarios OpenAI GPT-4.1 API, Anthropic Claude Haiku API, a self-hosted LLaMA-2–13B deployment, and a cloud-hosted LLaMA-2–13B deployment demonstrating how LCOAI captures critical trade-offs in scalability, investment planning, and cost optimization. Extensive sensitivity analyses further explore the impact of inference volume, CAPEX, and OPEX variability on lifecycle economics. The results illustrate the practical utility of LCOAI in procurement, infrastructure planning, and automation strategy, and establish it as a foundational benchmark for AI economic analysis. Policy implications and directions for future refinement, including integration of environmental and performance-adjusted cost metrics, are also discussed.
期刊介绍:
Information systems are the software and hardware systems that support data-intensive applications. The journal Information Systems publishes articles concerning the design and implementation of languages, data models, process models, algorithms, software and hardware for information systems.
Subject areas include data management issues as presented in the principal international database conferences (e.g., ACM SIGMOD/PODS, VLDB, ICDE and ICDT/EDBT) as well as data-related issues from the fields of data mining/machine learning, information retrieval coordinated with structured data, internet and cloud data management, business process management, web semantics, visual and audio information systems, scientific computing, and data science. Implementation papers having to do with massively parallel data management, fault tolerance in practice, and special purpose hardware for data-intensive systems are also welcome. Manuscripts from application domains, such as urban informatics, social and natural science, and Internet of Things, are also welcome. All papers should highlight innovative solutions to data management problems such as new data models, performance enhancements, and show how those innovations contribute to the goals of the application.