Ingrid E. Schneider , Megha Budruk , Arne Arnberger , Sonja Wilhelm Stanis
{"title":"区分狗公园游客:城市绿色系统中的激励市场细分","authors":"Ingrid E. Schneider , Megha Budruk , Arne Arnberger , Sonja Wilhelm Stanis","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dog parks are one of the fastest growing urban park segments in the United States and beyond. Despite this growth, dog park and associated visitor research remains scant. Given the proliferation of dog parks in the urban landscape and the ongoing land use and design challenges they present, it seems prudent to discern differences among dog-park users. This explorative study differentiated dog-park permit holders of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA to inform green space planning and management. Dog-park permit holders were sent an electronic invitation to complete a questionnaire and a single reminder that yielded a 30 % response rate (n = 2059). Descriptive, factor, cluster, and comparative analysis revealed four motivation-based clusters that differed by place attachment, constraint factors, visitation frequency and willingness to travel to a dog park. Constraints to dog-park visitation were relatively low and consistent with ‘nature social enthusiasts’ more constrained by dog-health status, while both ‘nature social enthusiasts’ and ‘solitary dog visitors’ were constrained by rules, likely due to their significantly higher visitation and exposure to them than the other two segments. All visitors were willing to travel at least twice the distance to a dog-park than their current trip, which can inform typical travel routes and system needs. The heterogeneity suggests the necessity and opportunity to engage across segments to inform planning and design. Further, the diverse desires for socialization and solitude inform immediate design opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129077"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiating dog-park visitors: Motivational market segments within an urban green system\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid E. Schneider , Megha Budruk , Arne Arnberger , Sonja Wilhelm Stanis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Dog parks are one of the fastest growing urban park segments in the United States and beyond. Despite this growth, dog park and associated visitor research remains scant. Given the proliferation of dog parks in the urban landscape and the ongoing land use and design challenges they present, it seems prudent to discern differences among dog-park users. This explorative study differentiated dog-park permit holders of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA to inform green space planning and management. Dog-park permit holders were sent an electronic invitation to complete a questionnaire and a single reminder that yielded a 30 % response rate (n = 2059). Descriptive, factor, cluster, and comparative analysis revealed four motivation-based clusters that differed by place attachment, constraint factors, visitation frequency and willingness to travel to a dog park. Constraints to dog-park visitation were relatively low and consistent with ‘nature social enthusiasts’ more constrained by dog-health status, while both ‘nature social enthusiasts’ and ‘solitary dog visitors’ were constrained by rules, likely due to their significantly higher visitation and exposure to them than the other two segments. All visitors were willing to travel at least twice the distance to a dog-park than their current trip, which can inform typical travel routes and system needs. The heterogeneity suggests the necessity and opportunity to engage across segments to inform planning and design. Further, the diverse desires for socialization and solitude inform immediate design opportunities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672500411X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672500411X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differentiating dog-park visitors: Motivational market segments within an urban green system
Dog parks are one of the fastest growing urban park segments in the United States and beyond. Despite this growth, dog park and associated visitor research remains scant. Given the proliferation of dog parks in the urban landscape and the ongoing land use and design challenges they present, it seems prudent to discern differences among dog-park users. This explorative study differentiated dog-park permit holders of the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA to inform green space planning and management. Dog-park permit holders were sent an electronic invitation to complete a questionnaire and a single reminder that yielded a 30 % response rate (n = 2059). Descriptive, factor, cluster, and comparative analysis revealed four motivation-based clusters that differed by place attachment, constraint factors, visitation frequency and willingness to travel to a dog park. Constraints to dog-park visitation were relatively low and consistent with ‘nature social enthusiasts’ more constrained by dog-health status, while both ‘nature social enthusiasts’ and ‘solitary dog visitors’ were constrained by rules, likely due to their significantly higher visitation and exposure to them than the other two segments. All visitors were willing to travel at least twice the distance to a dog-park than their current trip, which can inform typical travel routes and system needs. The heterogeneity suggests the necessity and opportunity to engage across segments to inform planning and design. Further, the diverse desires for socialization and solitude inform immediate design opportunities.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.