肯德尔·赫卡拉的木制遗骸:对木材鉴定和考古背景的见解

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Şakir Can , Ünal Akkemik , Şeyma Çiftçi
{"title":"肯德尔·赫卡拉的木制遗骸:对木材鉴定和考古背景的见解","authors":"Şakir Can ,&nbsp;Ünal Akkemik ,&nbsp;Şeyma Çiftçi","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analyzing the species identification and procurement of materials from the wooden remains excavated from the archaeological site of Kendale Hecala, located along the Ambar Çay in the Upper Tigris Region, sheds light on the wood utilization practices and environmental interactions of the inhabitants of the settlement. The findings reveal the tree species prevalent in the first half of the 5th millennium BC flora, corresponding to contemporary analogues. Of the 24 wood samples collected during the 2020–21 excavations, 17 were successfully identified, including eight willow/poplar (<em>Salix/Populus</em> spp.) woods, four oak (<em>Quercus</em> spp.) woods, three ash (<em>Fraxinus</em> spp.) woods, and two elm (<em>Ulmus</em> spp.) woods. Most of the samples were mineralized wood, with only six being carbonized. Ten samples were linked to structural components such as walls, floors, and roofs; five were associated with various contexts; and two were used as fuel sources. The analysis indicates that the inhabitants markedly preferred willow/poplar, ash, and elm species found in wetland areas along the Ambar Çay, just 120 m from the settlement. This selection is consistent with the ’principle of least effort’, emphasizing the use of locally accessible and readily available resources. The choice of wood as a construction material appears to have been a deliberate decision made in specific contexts. These findings may provide valuable insights into environmental interactions, the use of wood for structural purposes, and the economic strategies that influenced the inhabitants’ material choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 105418"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wooden remains from Kendale Hecala: insights into wood identification and archaeological context\",\"authors\":\"Şakir Can ,&nbsp;Ünal Akkemik ,&nbsp;Şeyma Çiftçi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Analyzing the species identification and procurement of materials from the wooden remains excavated from the archaeological site of Kendale Hecala, located along the Ambar Çay in the Upper Tigris Region, sheds light on the wood utilization practices and environmental interactions of the inhabitants of the settlement. The findings reveal the tree species prevalent in the first half of the 5th millennium BC flora, corresponding to contemporary analogues. Of the 24 wood samples collected during the 2020–21 excavations, 17 were successfully identified, including eight willow/poplar (<em>Salix/Populus</em> spp.) woods, four oak (<em>Quercus</em> spp.) woods, three ash (<em>Fraxinus</em> spp.) woods, and two elm (<em>Ulmus</em> spp.) woods. Most of the samples were mineralized wood, with only six being carbonized. Ten samples were linked to structural components such as walls, floors, and roofs; five were associated with various contexts; and two were used as fuel sources. The analysis indicates that the inhabitants markedly preferred willow/poplar, ash, and elm species found in wetland areas along the Ambar Çay, just 120 m from the settlement. This selection is consistent with the ’principle of least effort’, emphasizing the use of locally accessible and readily available resources. The choice of wood as a construction material appears to have been a deliberate decision made in specific contexts. These findings may provide valuable insights into environmental interactions, the use of wood for structural purposes, and the economic strategies that influenced the inhabitants’ material choices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25004511\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X25004511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析了在底格里斯河上游地区沿着Ambar Çay的Kendale Hecala考古遗址中挖掘的木材遗骸的物种鉴定和材料采购,揭示了该定居点居民的木材利用实践和环境相互作用。研究结果显示,这些树种普遍存在于公元前5千年前半期的植物区系中,与当代的类似物相对应。在2020-21年的24份木材样本中,成功鉴定了17份,包括8份柳树/杨木(Salix/Populus spp)、4份橡树(Quercus spp)、3份白蜡树(Fraxinus spp)和2份榆树(Ulmus spp)。大多数样品是矿化木材,只有6个样品是碳化的。其中10个样本与墙壁、地板和屋顶等结构部件有关;其中五个与不同的情境有关;其中两个用作燃料来源。分析表明,居民明显更喜欢在Ambar Çay沿岸湿地地区发现的柳树/杨树、白蜡树和榆树物种,这些物种距离定居点仅120米。这种选择符合“省力原则”,强调使用当地可获得和现成的资源。选择木材作为建筑材料似乎是在特定情况下深思熟虑的决定。这些发现可能对环境的相互作用、结构用途的木材使用以及影响居民材料选择的经济策略提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wooden remains from Kendale Hecala: insights into wood identification and archaeological context
Analyzing the species identification and procurement of materials from the wooden remains excavated from the archaeological site of Kendale Hecala, located along the Ambar Çay in the Upper Tigris Region, sheds light on the wood utilization practices and environmental interactions of the inhabitants of the settlement. The findings reveal the tree species prevalent in the first half of the 5th millennium BC flora, corresponding to contemporary analogues. Of the 24 wood samples collected during the 2020–21 excavations, 17 were successfully identified, including eight willow/poplar (Salix/Populus spp.) woods, four oak (Quercus spp.) woods, three ash (Fraxinus spp.) woods, and two elm (Ulmus spp.) woods. Most of the samples were mineralized wood, with only six being carbonized. Ten samples were linked to structural components such as walls, floors, and roofs; five were associated with various contexts; and two were used as fuel sources. The analysis indicates that the inhabitants markedly preferred willow/poplar, ash, and elm species found in wetland areas along the Ambar Çay, just 120 m from the settlement. This selection is consistent with the ’principle of least effort’, emphasizing the use of locally accessible and readily available resources. The choice of wood as a construction material appears to have been a deliberate decision made in specific contexts. These findings may provide valuable insights into environmental interactions, the use of wood for structural purposes, and the economic strategies that influenced the inhabitants’ material choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信