改善中欧和东欧园林的生物多样性需要区域规模战略

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zsófia Varga-Szilay , Arvīds Barševskis , Klára Benedek , Danilo Bevk , Agata Jojczyk , Anton Krištín , Jana Růžičková , Lucija Šerić Jelaska , Eve Veromann , Silva Vilumets , Kinga Gabriela Fetykó , Gergely Szövényi , Gábor Pozsgai
{"title":"改善中欧和东欧园林的生物多样性需要区域规模战略","authors":"Zsófia Varga-Szilay ,&nbsp;Arvīds Barševskis ,&nbsp;Klára Benedek ,&nbsp;Danilo Bevk ,&nbsp;Agata Jojczyk ,&nbsp;Anton Krištín ,&nbsp;Jana Růžičková ,&nbsp;Lucija Šerić Jelaska ,&nbsp;Eve Veromann ,&nbsp;Silva Vilumets ,&nbsp;Kinga Gabriela Fetykó ,&nbsp;Gergely Szövényi ,&nbsp;Gábor Pozsgai","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid ongoing urbanisation, gardens are expected to play an increasing role in enhancing urban biodiversity by supplementing green areas and improving landscape connectivity. Biodiversity-friendly gardens also improve human well-being and foster connections between nature and people. To study these benefits, we distributed a questionnaire (n = 5255), and used a scoring system to evaluate gardens’ ecological value (GAR index), gardeners' attitudes (RES index), and pesticide use habits (PES index). We used machine learning to explore how these indices interact and what sociodemographic factors drive them across Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Our aim was to explore the ecological values of gardens and gardening practices, identifying characteristics that might contribute to building high biodiversity. We found significant variability within and between countries, with Romania scoring low and Czechia high in all indices. Domestic pesticide use was ubiquitous across CEE and largely unaffected by sociodemographic factors. Increased time spent gardening was associated with the highest pesticide use and a greater potential for fostering high biodiversity. Gardeners aged over 55 tended to uphold longstanding conventional practices and thus lowered both PES and GAR index scores. The local differences highlight the need for regionally tailored biodiversity-friendly gardening guidelines instead of standardised regulations across Europe. Effective environmental education and community programs can be developed based on local biodiversity and the three indices we used. These programs should inform gardeners about the environmental and health impacts of pesticides and provide comprehensive biodiversity-related knowledge. This is especially important in CEE, where such initiatives are currently underrepresented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129074"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving biodiversity in Central and Eastern European gardens needs regionally scaled strategies\",\"authors\":\"Zsófia Varga-Szilay ,&nbsp;Arvīds Barševskis ,&nbsp;Klára Benedek ,&nbsp;Danilo Bevk ,&nbsp;Agata Jojczyk ,&nbsp;Anton Krištín ,&nbsp;Jana Růžičková ,&nbsp;Lucija Šerić Jelaska ,&nbsp;Eve Veromann ,&nbsp;Silva Vilumets ,&nbsp;Kinga Gabriela Fetykó ,&nbsp;Gergely Szövényi ,&nbsp;Gábor Pozsgai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid ongoing urbanisation, gardens are expected to play an increasing role in enhancing urban biodiversity by supplementing green areas and improving landscape connectivity. Biodiversity-friendly gardens also improve human well-being and foster connections between nature and people. To study these benefits, we distributed a questionnaire (n = 5255), and used a scoring system to evaluate gardens’ ecological value (GAR index), gardeners' attitudes (RES index), and pesticide use habits (PES index). We used machine learning to explore how these indices interact and what sociodemographic factors drive them across Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Our aim was to explore the ecological values of gardens and gardening practices, identifying characteristics that might contribute to building high biodiversity. We found significant variability within and between countries, with Romania scoring low and Czechia high in all indices. Domestic pesticide use was ubiquitous across CEE and largely unaffected by sociodemographic factors. Increased time spent gardening was associated with the highest pesticide use and a greater potential for fostering high biodiversity. Gardeners aged over 55 tended to uphold longstanding conventional practices and thus lowered both PES and GAR index scores. The local differences highlight the need for regionally tailored biodiversity-friendly gardening guidelines instead of standardised regulations across Europe. Effective environmental education and community programs can be developed based on local biodiversity and the three indices we used. These programs should inform gardeners about the environmental and health impacts of pesticides and provide comprehensive biodiversity-related knowledge. This is especially important in CEE, where such initiatives are currently underrepresented.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672500408X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672500408X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在持续的城市化进程中,花园有望通过补充绿地和改善景观连通性,在增强城市生物多样性方面发挥越来越大的作用。对生物多样性友好的花园还能改善人类福祉,促进自然与人之间的联系。为了研究这些效益,我们发放了一份问卷(n = 5255),并使用评分系统对花园的生态价值(GAR指数)、园丁态度(RES指数)和农药使用习惯(PES指数)进行了评估。我们使用机器学习来探索这些指数如何相互作用,以及在中欧和东欧(CEE)推动这些指数的社会人口因素。我们的目的是探索花园和园艺实践的生态价值,确定可能有助于建立高生物多样性的特征。我们发现国家内部和国家之间存在显著差异,罗马尼亚在所有指数中得分较低,而捷克得分较高。家庭农药的使用在中东欧国家普遍存在,并且在很大程度上不受社会人口因素的影响。花在园艺上的时间越长,农药使用量越高,培育高生物多样性的潜力也越大。55岁以上的园丁倾向于坚持长期的传统做法,因此降低了PES和GAR指数得分。当地的差异凸显出需要制定适合当地的生物多样性友好型园艺指南,而不是整个欧洲的标准化法规。基于当地生物多样性和我们使用的三个指标,可以制定有效的环境教育和社区计划。这些项目应该让园丁了解农药对环境和健康的影响,并提供全面的生物多样性相关知识。这在中欧和东欧尤其重要,因为这些倡议目前的代表性不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving biodiversity in Central and Eastern European gardens needs regionally scaled strategies
Amid ongoing urbanisation, gardens are expected to play an increasing role in enhancing urban biodiversity by supplementing green areas and improving landscape connectivity. Biodiversity-friendly gardens also improve human well-being and foster connections between nature and people. To study these benefits, we distributed a questionnaire (n = 5255), and used a scoring system to evaluate gardens’ ecological value (GAR index), gardeners' attitudes (RES index), and pesticide use habits (PES index). We used machine learning to explore how these indices interact and what sociodemographic factors drive them across Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). Our aim was to explore the ecological values of gardens and gardening practices, identifying characteristics that might contribute to building high biodiversity. We found significant variability within and between countries, with Romania scoring low and Czechia high in all indices. Domestic pesticide use was ubiquitous across CEE and largely unaffected by sociodemographic factors. Increased time spent gardening was associated with the highest pesticide use and a greater potential for fostering high biodiversity. Gardeners aged over 55 tended to uphold longstanding conventional practices and thus lowered both PES and GAR index scores. The local differences highlight the need for regionally tailored biodiversity-friendly gardening guidelines instead of standardised regulations across Europe. Effective environmental education and community programs can be developed based on local biodiversity and the three indices we used. These programs should inform gardeners about the environmental and health impacts of pesticides and provide comprehensive biodiversity-related knowledge. This is especially important in CEE, where such initiatives are currently underrepresented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信