脑卒中幸存者的社会认知功能:范围综述

IF 2.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ana Davlasheridze , Lena Rafsten , David Krabbe , Farzaneh Badinlou , Renate Reniers , Terence J Quinn , Tamar Abzhandadze
{"title":"脑卒中幸存者的社会认知功能:范围综述","authors":"Ana Davlasheridze ,&nbsp;Lena Rafsten ,&nbsp;David Krabbe ,&nbsp;Farzaneh Badinlou ,&nbsp;Renate Reniers ,&nbsp;Terence J Quinn ,&nbsp;Tamar Abzhandadze","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2025.100398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to summarize current evidence on social cognitive function in stroke survivors by: identifying social cognition domains assessed; describing assessment tools; reporting impairment prevalence; and outlining interventions targeting impaired social cognition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Updated methodological scoping review guidelines were followed. Database searches were conducted by a librarian on February 26, 2024 (starting from January 1, 2000), across multidisciplinary, international databases. Two authors who independently screened title, abstract, and full texts, resolved discrepancies through discussion or senior reviewer input. Standardized data extraction forms were used, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 29,069 records, 62 studies, mostly hospital-based (52 %), using case-control designs (37 %), met the inclusion criteria. They included 3152 participants with stroke (62 % male), mainly with ischemic stroke (61 %), and right hemisphere lesions (39 %). The five domains (number, most common assessment instruments, and prevalence/or mean ± <em>s</em>.d.) of social cognitive function were: emotion perception and recognition (<em>n</em> = 38, “Ekman 60-Faces Test,” 7–100 %); theory of mind (<em>n</em> = 23, “Reading the Mind in the Eyes,” 15–64 %); empathy (<em>n</em> = 15, 24 %, “Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale,” 6–58 %); emotion regulation (<em>n</em> = 1, 2 %, “Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale,” range: 8.8 ± 3.87–72.07±21.54); and social problem-solving (<em>n</em> = 2, “Social Problem-Solving Fluency Task,” range: 18.02±4.62–98.1 ± 4.0). No study focused on interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Social cognition after stroke research has mainly addressed emotion recognition, theory of mind, and empathy, with limited attention to other aspects. Although social cognition impairments were common, no studies have specifically targeted their rehabilitation, underscoring the need for focused interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social cognitive function in stroke survivors: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Ana Davlasheridze ,&nbsp;Lena Rafsten ,&nbsp;David Krabbe ,&nbsp;Farzaneh Badinlou ,&nbsp;Renate Reniers ,&nbsp;Terence J Quinn ,&nbsp;Tamar Abzhandadze\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cccb.2025.100398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to summarize current evidence on social cognitive function in stroke survivors by: identifying social cognition domains assessed; describing assessment tools; reporting impairment prevalence; and outlining interventions targeting impaired social cognition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Updated methodological scoping review guidelines were followed. Database searches were conducted by a librarian on February 26, 2024 (starting from January 1, 2000), across multidisciplinary, international databases. Two authors who independently screened title, abstract, and full texts, resolved discrepancies through discussion or senior reviewer input. Standardized data extraction forms were used, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 29,069 records, 62 studies, mostly hospital-based (52 %), using case-control designs (37 %), met the inclusion criteria. They included 3152 participants with stroke (62 % male), mainly with ischemic stroke (61 %), and right hemisphere lesions (39 %). The five domains (number, most common assessment instruments, and prevalence/or mean ± <em>s</em>.d.) of social cognitive function were: emotion perception and recognition (<em>n</em> = 38, “Ekman 60-Faces Test,” 7–100 %); theory of mind (<em>n</em> = 23, “Reading the Mind in the Eyes,” 15–64 %); empathy (<em>n</em> = 15, 24 %, “Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale,” 6–58 %); emotion regulation (<em>n</em> = 1, 2 %, “Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale,” range: 8.8 ± 3.87–72.07±21.54); and social problem-solving (<em>n</em> = 2, “Social Problem-Solving Fluency Task,” range: 18.02±4.62–98.1 ± 4.0). No study focused on interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Social cognition after stroke research has mainly addressed emotion recognition, theory of mind, and empathy, with limited attention to other aspects. Although social cognition impairments were common, no studies have specifically targeted their rehabilitation, underscoring the need for focused interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245025000224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245025000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的总结脑卒中幸存者社会认知功能的现有证据,包括:确定评估的社会认知领域;描述评估工具;报告损害发生率;并概述了针对社会认知障碍的干预措施。方法遵循更新的方法学范围审查指南。数据库检索由图书管理员于2024年2月26日(从2000年1月1日开始)进行,涉及多学科的国际数据库。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,通过讨论或资深审稿人的意见解决差异。采用标准化的数据提取表格,采用描述性统计对数据进行分析。结果在29,069份记录中,62项研究符合纳入标准,其中大部分是基于医院的(52%),采用病例对照设计(37%)。他们包括3152名中风患者(62%为男性),主要是缺血性中风(61%)和右半球病变(39%)。社会认知功能的五个领域(数量,最常见的评估工具和患病率/或平均值±s.d)是:情绪感知和识别(n = 38,“Ekman 60-Faces Test”,7 - 100%);心理理论(n = 23,“通过眼睛读心”,15 - 64%);共情(n = 15, 24%,“平衡情感共情量表”6 - 58%);情绪调节(n = 1,2 %,“情绪调节困难量表”,范围:8.8±3.87-72.07±21.54);社会问题解决(n = 2,“社会问题解决流畅性测试”,范围:18.02±4.62-98.1±4.0)。没有研究关注干预措施。结论脑卒中后社会认知研究主要集中在情绪识别、心理理论和共情等方面,对其他方面关注较少。虽然社会认知障碍很常见,但没有研究专门针对他们的康复,强调需要有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social cognitive function in stroke survivors: A scoping review

Objective

We aimed to summarize current evidence on social cognitive function in stroke survivors by: identifying social cognition domains assessed; describing assessment tools; reporting impairment prevalence; and outlining interventions targeting impaired social cognition.

Methods

Updated methodological scoping review guidelines were followed. Database searches were conducted by a librarian on February 26, 2024 (starting from January 1, 2000), across multidisciplinary, international databases. Two authors who independently screened title, abstract, and full texts, resolved discrepancies through discussion or senior reviewer input. Standardized data extraction forms were used, and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Of 29,069 records, 62 studies, mostly hospital-based (52 %), using case-control designs (37 %), met the inclusion criteria. They included 3152 participants with stroke (62 % male), mainly with ischemic stroke (61 %), and right hemisphere lesions (39 %). The five domains (number, most common assessment instruments, and prevalence/or mean ± s.d.) of social cognitive function were: emotion perception and recognition (n = 38, “Ekman 60-Faces Test,” 7–100 %); theory of mind (n = 23, “Reading the Mind in the Eyes,” 15–64 %); empathy (n = 15, 24 %, “Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale,” 6–58 %); emotion regulation (n = 1, 2 %, “Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale,” range: 8.8 ± 3.87–72.07±21.54); and social problem-solving (n = 2, “Social Problem-Solving Fluency Task,” range: 18.02±4.62–98.1 ± 4.0). No study focused on interventions.

Conclusion

Social cognition after stroke research has mainly addressed emotion recognition, theory of mind, and empathy, with limited attention to other aspects. Although social cognition impairments were common, no studies have specifically targeted their rehabilitation, underscoring the need for focused interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信