社区花园长什么?深入了解布里斯班和澳大利亚黄金海岸社区花园的农业生物多样性

IF 6.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Catherine Pickering, Ali Chauvenet, Jesse Raneng
{"title":"社区花园长什么?深入了解布里斯班和澳大利亚黄金海岸社区花园的农业生物多样性","authors":"Catherine Pickering,&nbsp;Ali Chauvenet,&nbsp;Jesse Raneng","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Community gardens have multiple social, environmental and economic benefits, but information about what they grow is sparse, limiting our capacity to evaluate their contribution to agrobiodiversity. Here we assessed the types of food plants and varieties grown in 27 community gardens in Brisbane and the Gold Coast in Australia. We evaluate factors potentially accounting for variation among gardens including size, age, gardening practices, as well as levels of urbanization, population density, socioeconomic status, income and age of those living around the gardens. The gardens ranged from 42 to 21,481 m<sup>2</sup> in size (average 2634 m<sup>2</sup>)<sup>,</sup> and 1–24 years in age (average 14 years), and were mostly in medium to high density parts of the cities. A diversity of plants was grown (248 varieties, average 77 per garden), mainly vegetables (100 % gardens, 54 varieties), herbs and spices (100 %, 39), fruit (96 %, 56) and Australian native plants (bushtucker, 96 %, 33), with Basil, Lettuce, Eggplant, Ginger, Marigolds, Mint, Nasturtium, Parsley, and Cherry tomatoes common. Applying Generalised Linear Modelling we found that younger gardens, those on the Gold Coast, and gardens with permaculture practices and/or individual plots had higher agrodiversity. These results, combined with 10 other studies, highlight the value of community gardens as hotspots of biodiversity and how they act as dynamic germplasm banks for agrobiodiversity. Ongoing support is key to maintaining these benefits, as is further research including in other cities, into adaptations to climate change and into the motivations of gardens to grow specific food plants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 129078"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What grows in community gardens? Insights into agrobiodiversity across community gardens in Brisbane and the Gold Coast, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Pickering,&nbsp;Ali Chauvenet,&nbsp;Jesse Raneng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.129078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Community gardens have multiple social, environmental and economic benefits, but information about what they grow is sparse, limiting our capacity to evaluate their contribution to agrobiodiversity. Here we assessed the types of food plants and varieties grown in 27 community gardens in Brisbane and the Gold Coast in Australia. We evaluate factors potentially accounting for variation among gardens including size, age, gardening practices, as well as levels of urbanization, population density, socioeconomic status, income and age of those living around the gardens. The gardens ranged from 42 to 21,481 m<sup>2</sup> in size (average 2634 m<sup>2</sup>)<sup>,</sup> and 1–24 years in age (average 14 years), and were mostly in medium to high density parts of the cities. A diversity of plants was grown (248 varieties, average 77 per garden), mainly vegetables (100 % gardens, 54 varieties), herbs and spices (100 %, 39), fruit (96 %, 56) and Australian native plants (bushtucker, 96 %, 33), with Basil, Lettuce, Eggplant, Ginger, Marigolds, Mint, Nasturtium, Parsley, and Cherry tomatoes common. Applying Generalised Linear Modelling we found that younger gardens, those on the Gold Coast, and gardens with permaculture practices and/or individual plots had higher agrodiversity. These results, combined with 10 other studies, highlight the value of community gardens as hotspots of biodiversity and how they act as dynamic germplasm banks for agrobiodiversity. Ongoing support is key to maintaining these benefits, as is further research including in other cities, into adaptations to climate change and into the motivations of gardens to grow specific food plants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"volume\":\"113 \",\"pages\":\"Article 129078\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725004121\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725004121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区花园具有多种社会、环境和经济效益,但关于它们种植什么的信息很少,限制了我们评估它们对农业生物多样性贡献的能力。在这里,我们评估了在澳大利亚布里斯班和黄金海岸的27个社区花园中种植的食用植物的类型和品种。我们评估了可能导致花园差异的因素,包括规模、年龄、园艺实践、城市化水平、人口密度、社会经济地位、花园周围居民的收入和年龄。园林面积为42 ~ 21481 m2(平均2634 m2),树龄为1 ~ 24年(平均14年),主要分布在城市的中高密度地区。种植了多种植物(248个品种,平均每个花园77个品种),主要是蔬菜(100个 %花园,54个品种)、草药和香料(100个 %,39个品种)、水果(96个 %,56个品种)和澳大利亚本土植物(灌木,96个 %,33个品种),常见的有罗勒、莴苣、茄子、姜、万寿菊、薄荷、旱金莲、欧芹和圣果。应用广义线性模型,我们发现年轻的花园,黄金海岸的花园,以及采用永续栽培和/或单独地块的花园具有更高的农业多样性。这些结果与其他10项研究相结合,突出了社区花园作为生物多样性热点的价值,以及它们如何作为农业生物多样性的动态种质资源库。持续的支持是保持这些好处的关键,就像在其他城市进行的进一步研究一样,研究适应气候变化和花园种植特定食用植物的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What grows in community gardens? Insights into agrobiodiversity across community gardens in Brisbane and the Gold Coast, Australia
Community gardens have multiple social, environmental and economic benefits, but information about what they grow is sparse, limiting our capacity to evaluate their contribution to agrobiodiversity. Here we assessed the types of food plants and varieties grown in 27 community gardens in Brisbane and the Gold Coast in Australia. We evaluate factors potentially accounting for variation among gardens including size, age, gardening practices, as well as levels of urbanization, population density, socioeconomic status, income and age of those living around the gardens. The gardens ranged from 42 to 21,481 m2 in size (average 2634 m2), and 1–24 years in age (average 14 years), and were mostly in medium to high density parts of the cities. A diversity of plants was grown (248 varieties, average 77 per garden), mainly vegetables (100 % gardens, 54 varieties), herbs and spices (100 %, 39), fruit (96 %, 56) and Australian native plants (bushtucker, 96 %, 33), with Basil, Lettuce, Eggplant, Ginger, Marigolds, Mint, Nasturtium, Parsley, and Cherry tomatoes common. Applying Generalised Linear Modelling we found that younger gardens, those on the Gold Coast, and gardens with permaculture practices and/or individual plots had higher agrodiversity. These results, combined with 10 other studies, highlight the value of community gardens as hotspots of biodiversity and how they act as dynamic germplasm banks for agrobiodiversity. Ongoing support is key to maintaining these benefits, as is further research including in other cities, into adaptations to climate change and into the motivations of gardens to grow specific food plants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信