应用于早第四纪沉积物测年的ESR强度评价新剂量学方法

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Shuchen Wang , Baotian Pan , Tianqi Yan , Hongshan Gao , Desheng Xue , Lin Qin , Chuantao Jing , Zhenbo Hu
{"title":"应用于早第四纪沉积物测年的ESR强度评价新剂量学方法","authors":"Shuchen Wang ,&nbsp;Baotian Pan ,&nbsp;Tianqi Yan ,&nbsp;Hongshan Gao ,&nbsp;Desheng Xue ,&nbsp;Lin Qin ,&nbsp;Chuantao Jing ,&nbsp;Zhenbo Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The differences in electron spin resonance (ESR) dating results, based on quartz Titanium (Ti) center, arises from the diversity in signal intensity metrics, which is responsible to dose response characteristics and temporal scales in this method application for the Quaternary chronology. To solve this issue, a multiple evaluation in terms of characteristic saturation dose (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), radiation sensitivity (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>rad.</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>), and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio has been employed here for ESR intensity metrics determination, presenting the most excellent dosimeter. On the basis of this method, three sandy samples taken from the gravel layers accumulated on the oldest Yellow River terraces T9, T8, and T7 have been constrained tightly. In these obtained results, the Ti Option A as the most excellent dosimeter has well determined the terrace T9, T8, and T7 at 1599 ± 269 ka, 1695 ± 176 ka, and 1364 ± 170 ka, respectively, which can be roughly correlated with the basal ages of the aeolian loess overlying directly the three terrace treads. This correlation has not only further checked the Ti Option A as the most excellent dosimeter, but also pointed out a higher reliability in chronological determination, implying that this dosimetric method can probably be widely used for the fluvial deposits dating with early Quaternary timescale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9801,"journal":{"name":"Catena","volume":"261 ","pages":"Article 109510"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new dosimetric method for evaluating the ESR intensity metrics applied to the early Quaternary sediments dating\",\"authors\":\"Shuchen Wang ,&nbsp;Baotian Pan ,&nbsp;Tianqi Yan ,&nbsp;Hongshan Gao ,&nbsp;Desheng Xue ,&nbsp;Lin Qin ,&nbsp;Chuantao Jing ,&nbsp;Zhenbo Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.catena.2025.109510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The differences in electron spin resonance (ESR) dating results, based on quartz Titanium (Ti) center, arises from the diversity in signal intensity metrics, which is responsible to dose response characteristics and temporal scales in this method application for the Quaternary chronology. To solve this issue, a multiple evaluation in terms of characteristic saturation dose (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), radiation sensitivity (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>κ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>rad.</mi></mrow></msub></math></span>), and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio has been employed here for ESR intensity metrics determination, presenting the most excellent dosimeter. On the basis of this method, three sandy samples taken from the gravel layers accumulated on the oldest Yellow River terraces T9, T8, and T7 have been constrained tightly. In these obtained results, the Ti Option A as the most excellent dosimeter has well determined the terrace T9, T8, and T7 at 1599 ± 269 ka, 1695 ± 176 ka, and 1364 ± 170 ka, respectively, which can be roughly correlated with the basal ages of the aeolian loess overlying directly the three terrace treads. This correlation has not only further checked the Ti Option A as the most excellent dosimeter, but also pointed out a higher reliability in chronological determination, implying that this dosimetric method can probably be widely used for the fluvial deposits dating with early Quaternary timescale.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catena\",\"volume\":\"261 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225008124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catena","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0341816225008124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于石英钛(Ti)中心的电子自旋共振(ESR)定年结果的差异主要是由于信号强度指标的差异,这与该方法在第四纪年代学中的剂量响应特性和时间尺度有关。为了解决这一问题,本文采用特征饱和剂量(D0)、辐射灵敏度(κrad.)和信噪比(S/N)的多重评价来确定ESR强度指标,给出了最优的剂量计。在此基础上,从黄河最古老梯田T9、T8和T7的砾石层中采集了3个砂质样品,并对其进行了严密的约束。其中,Ti Option A作为最优良的剂量计,分别测定了1599±269 ka、1695±176 ka和1364±170 ka的梯田T9、T8和T7梯田,可以与3个梯田踏面直接覆盖的风成黄土的基本年龄大致相关。这一对比不仅进一步证明了Ti Option A是最优秀的剂量计,而且在年代测定方面具有较高的可靠性,表明该剂量法可以广泛应用于早第四纪的河流沉积测年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A new dosimetric method for evaluating the ESR intensity metrics applied to the early Quaternary sediments dating
The differences in electron spin resonance (ESR) dating results, based on quartz Titanium (Ti) center, arises from the diversity in signal intensity metrics, which is responsible to dose response characteristics and temporal scales in this method application for the Quaternary chronology. To solve this issue, a multiple evaluation in terms of characteristic saturation dose (D0), radiation sensitivity (κrad.), and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio has been employed here for ESR intensity metrics determination, presenting the most excellent dosimeter. On the basis of this method, three sandy samples taken from the gravel layers accumulated on the oldest Yellow River terraces T9, T8, and T7 have been constrained tightly. In these obtained results, the Ti Option A as the most excellent dosimeter has well determined the terrace T9, T8, and T7 at 1599 ± 269 ka, 1695 ± 176 ka, and 1364 ± 170 ka, respectively, which can be roughly correlated with the basal ages of the aeolian loess overlying directly the three terrace treads. This correlation has not only further checked the Ti Option A as the most excellent dosimeter, but also pointed out a higher reliability in chronological determination, implying that this dosimetric method can probably be widely used for the fluvial deposits dating with early Quaternary timescale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Catena
Catena 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
816
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Catena publishes papers describing original field and laboratory investigations and reviews on geoecology and landscape evolution with emphasis on interdisciplinary aspects of soil science, hydrology and geomorphology. It aims to disseminate new knowledge and foster better understanding of the physical environment, of evolutionary sequences that have resulted in past and current landscapes, and of the natural processes that are likely to determine the fate of our terrestrial environment. Papers within any one of the above topics are welcome provided they are of sufficiently wide interest and relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信