{"title":"实验室棒材样品制造的可靠性:壁尺度上湿热特性的可变性","authors":"Junior Tchiotsop , Stéphanie Bonnet , Nabil Issaadi , Philippe Poullain","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article investigates how cob specimens manufactured in a laboratory are representative of a real-scale cob wall. Emphasis is placed on hygrothermal properties, which are a significant asset for reducing energy costs of buildings. It is a continuation of a previous paper in which the natural variability of the manufactured cob samples was evaluated at the material scale (laboratory samples) (Tchiotsop et al., 2022). Indeed, numerous works propose various laboratory fabrication protocol parameters and approaches for the cob specimens. Hence, a 3.2 m<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> cob wall with 3% hemp shives content (by mass) was built, dried, and cored following a regular meshing plan. The variability of the wall specimens’ hygrothermal properties (density, thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, moisture adsorption, moisture permeability, and intrinsic permeability) was measured and computed using the same protocols as in the previous article. As main results (details on the graphical abstract), the mean statistics of the dry bulk density and thermal properties showed good agreement between material and wall scales, while the variabilities were not always well represented at the material scale. For moisture transfer and storage properties, a significant gap was found in the statistics (up to 216%). Probability density functions (pdfs) of properties were assessed for both scales, and the same functions were found to be reliable. This study reveals the complexity at the real scale of cob buildings, making it difficult to obtain a representative specimen for characterization purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"497 ","pages":"Article 143289"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of the laboratory cob specimens manufacturing: Variability of hygrothermal properties at the wall scale\",\"authors\":\"Junior Tchiotsop , Stéphanie Bonnet , Nabil Issaadi , Philippe Poullain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article investigates how cob specimens manufactured in a laboratory are representative of a real-scale cob wall. Emphasis is placed on hygrothermal properties, which are a significant asset for reducing energy costs of buildings. It is a continuation of a previous paper in which the natural variability of the manufactured cob samples was evaluated at the material scale (laboratory samples) (Tchiotsop et al., 2022). Indeed, numerous works propose various laboratory fabrication protocol parameters and approaches for the cob specimens. Hence, a 3.2 m<span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msup></math></span> cob wall with 3% hemp shives content (by mass) was built, dried, and cored following a regular meshing plan. The variability of the wall specimens’ hygrothermal properties (density, thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, moisture adsorption, moisture permeability, and intrinsic permeability) was measured and computed using the same protocols as in the previous article. As main results (details on the graphical abstract), the mean statistics of the dry bulk density and thermal properties showed good agreement between material and wall scales, while the variabilities were not always well represented at the material scale. For moisture transfer and storage properties, a significant gap was found in the statistics (up to 216%). Probability density functions (pdfs) of properties were assessed for both scales, and the same functions were found to be reliable. This study reveals the complexity at the real scale of cob buildings, making it difficult to obtain a representative specimen for characterization purposes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"497 \",\"pages\":\"Article 143289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825034403\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825034403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文研究了在实验室中制造的棒材样品如何代表真实规模的棒材壁。重点放在湿热性能上,这是降低建筑能源成本的重要资产。这是前一篇论文的延续,其中在材料尺度(实验室样本)上评估了人造穗轴样本的自然变异性(Tchiotsop et al., 2022)。事实上,许多工作提出了各种实验室制作协议参数和方法的棒材标本。因此,一个3.2平方米的玉米芯墙,含有3%的麻屑含量(按质量计算),按照规则的网格规划进行建造、干燥和芯化。采用与上一篇文章相同的方法测量和计算墙体样品的湿热特性(密度、导热系数、体积热容、吸湿性、透湿性和固有渗透性)的可变性。作为主要结果(详见图表摘要),干容重和热性能的平均统计数据在材料尺度和壁面尺度之间显示出良好的一致性,而在材料尺度上的变异性并不总是很好地表示。对于水分传递和储存性能,统计数据中发现了显著的差距(高达216%)。对两个尺度的属性的概率密度函数(pdf)进行了评估,发现相同的函数是可靠的。这项研究揭示了cob建筑真实规模的复杂性,使得难以获得具有代表性的样本进行表征。
Reliability of the laboratory cob specimens manufacturing: Variability of hygrothermal properties at the wall scale
This article investigates how cob specimens manufactured in a laboratory are representative of a real-scale cob wall. Emphasis is placed on hygrothermal properties, which are a significant asset for reducing energy costs of buildings. It is a continuation of a previous paper in which the natural variability of the manufactured cob samples was evaluated at the material scale (laboratory samples) (Tchiotsop et al., 2022). Indeed, numerous works propose various laboratory fabrication protocol parameters and approaches for the cob specimens. Hence, a 3.2 m cob wall with 3% hemp shives content (by mass) was built, dried, and cored following a regular meshing plan. The variability of the wall specimens’ hygrothermal properties (density, thermal conductivity, volumetric heat capacity, moisture adsorption, moisture permeability, and intrinsic permeability) was measured and computed using the same protocols as in the previous article. As main results (details on the graphical abstract), the mean statistics of the dry bulk density and thermal properties showed good agreement between material and wall scales, while the variabilities were not always well represented at the material scale. For moisture transfer and storage properties, a significant gap was found in the statistics (up to 216%). Probability density functions (pdfs) of properties were assessed for both scales, and the same functions were found to be reliable. This study reveals the complexity at the real scale of cob buildings, making it difficult to obtain a representative specimen for characterization purposes.
期刊介绍:
Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged.
Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.