基于Fermatean模糊集和后悔理论的零碳盐洞储氢库选址评价

IF 8.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Hui Zhao , Handi Zhang
{"title":"基于Fermatean模糊集和后悔理论的零碳盐洞储氢库选址评价","authors":"Hui Zhao ,&nbsp;Handi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve global energy transformation and net zero carbon emissions, hydrogen energy with abundant green and clean sources has gradually become the research focus. Renewable energy electrolytic water hydrogen production and salt cavern hydrogen storage (SCHS), combined with the “production-storage” integration model of zero carbon emissions throughout the whole process, has undoubtedly become the focus of the energy field. At present, this area of research is in its infancy, and choosing the right SCHS site is crucial to avoid unnecessary losses. However, the existing site selection models (such as AHP and TOPSIS) have limitations when dealing with the fuzzy evaluation information and psychological factors of decision-makers in such complex multi-criteria problems. Based on this, a multi-criteria decision-making method is proposed from five dimensions: geology, economy, society, environment, and risk, considering the fuzziness and uncertainty of evaluation information and the psychological state of decision-makers. Through sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis, the reliability and applicability of the siting model are verified, and 8 salt deposits in eastern China are evaluated. The results showed that (Jintan Salt Deposit) was the best location with a score of 0.2592, while (Zhoutian Salt Deposit) was the least suitable for SCHS with a score of −0.3499. This provides a scientific theoretical basis for the site selection of SCHS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 151813"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of site selection for zero carbon salt cavern hydrogen storage based on Fermatean fuzzy set and Regret Theory - TODIM\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zhao ,&nbsp;Handi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To achieve global energy transformation and net zero carbon emissions, hydrogen energy with abundant green and clean sources has gradually become the research focus. Renewable energy electrolytic water hydrogen production and salt cavern hydrogen storage (SCHS), combined with the “production-storage” integration model of zero carbon emissions throughout the whole process, has undoubtedly become the focus of the energy field. At present, this area of research is in its infancy, and choosing the right SCHS site is crucial to avoid unnecessary losses. However, the existing site selection models (such as AHP and TOPSIS) have limitations when dealing with the fuzzy evaluation information and psychological factors of decision-makers in such complex multi-criteria problems. Based on this, a multi-criteria decision-making method is proposed from five dimensions: geology, economy, society, environment, and risk, considering the fuzziness and uncertainty of evaluation information and the psychological state of decision-makers. Through sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis, the reliability and applicability of the siting model are verified, and 8 salt deposits in eastern China are evaluated. The results showed that (Jintan Salt Deposit) was the best location with a score of 0.2592, while (Zhoutian Salt Deposit) was the least suitable for SCHS with a score of −0.3499. This provides a scientific theoretical basis for the site selection of SCHS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"volume\":\"182 \",\"pages\":\"Article 151813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925048165\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925048165","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为实现全球能源转型和净零碳排放,具有丰富绿色清洁能源的氢能逐渐成为研究热点。可再生能源电解水制氢和盐穴储氢(SCHS),结合全过程零碳排放的“产-储”一体化模式,无疑成为能源领域的焦点。目前,这一领域的研究还处于起步阶段,选择合适的SCHS位点对于避免不必要的损失至关重要。然而,现有的选址模型(如AHP和TOPSIS)在处理复杂的多准则问题中模糊的评价信息和决策者的心理因素时存在局限性。在此基础上,考虑评价信息的模糊性和不确定性以及决策者的心理状态,从地质、经济、社会、环境、风险五个维度提出了多准则决策方法。通过敏感性分析和对比分析,验证了选址模型的可靠性和适用性,并对中国东部地区8个盐矿进行了评价。结果表明,金坛盐矿为最佳生境,得分为0.2592,周田盐矿为最差生境,得分为- 0.3499。这为学校选址提供了科学的理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of site selection for zero carbon salt cavern hydrogen storage based on Fermatean fuzzy set and Regret Theory - TODIM
To achieve global energy transformation and net zero carbon emissions, hydrogen energy with abundant green and clean sources has gradually become the research focus. Renewable energy electrolytic water hydrogen production and salt cavern hydrogen storage (SCHS), combined with the “production-storage” integration model of zero carbon emissions throughout the whole process, has undoubtedly become the focus of the energy field. At present, this area of research is in its infancy, and choosing the right SCHS site is crucial to avoid unnecessary losses. However, the existing site selection models (such as AHP and TOPSIS) have limitations when dealing with the fuzzy evaluation information and psychological factors of decision-makers in such complex multi-criteria problems. Based on this, a multi-criteria decision-making method is proposed from five dimensions: geology, economy, society, environment, and risk, considering the fuzziness and uncertainty of evaluation information and the psychological state of decision-makers. Through sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis, the reliability and applicability of the siting model are verified, and 8 salt deposits in eastern China are evaluated. The results showed that (Jintan Salt Deposit) was the best location with a score of 0.2592, while (Zhoutian Salt Deposit) was the least suitable for SCHS with a score of −0.3499. This provides a scientific theoretical basis for the site selection of SCHS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 工程技术-环境科学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc. The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信