评价水质传感器性能的框架

Nidhi Sahu, Atul Maldhure
{"title":"评价水质传感器性能的框架","authors":"Nidhi Sahu,&nbsp;Atul Maldhure","doi":"10.1016/j.clwat.2025.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ensuring water quality requires continuous monitoring and assessment. Traditional approaches, based on manual sampling and laboratory analysis, are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly. Sensor-based technologies offer real-time water quality monitoring with high sensitivity, selectivity, cost-effectiveness, and operational efficiency. However, before field deployment, sensors must undergo rigorous validation to ensure accuracy, reliability, and long-term performance. Implementing validation protocols is essential to achieve consistency, reproducibility, and comparability of sensor performance across diverse monitoring locations and environmental conditions. This study proposes a structured validation framework, providing a systematic methodology to evaluate water quality sensors. To demonstrate its applicability, a commercially procured pH sensor was validated under controlled laboratory conditions using standard buffer solutions. The results indicate that the sensor showed the accuracy of 97.58 % in the acidic range (pH 1–6), 98.84 % at neutral pH (pH 7), and 94.38 % in the basic range (pH 8–14). Precision analysis showed intraday variability between 0.89–1.75 % RSD and interday variability between 0.71–2.85 % RSD, with strong linearity (R² = 0.9988), confirming consistent and reproducible performance. These results confirm that standards-based validation offers assurance of the sensor’s operational reliability and accuracy. While validation with standards is a critical first step, comprehensive assessment requires testing across different water matrices, where complex ionic composition, organic matter, and interfering species may influence sensor performance. To ensure sustained performance, it is also recommended that the sensor undergo field validation following installation and be periodically reassessed, typically every six months. This study establishes the foundation for a robust validation framework that can be extended to diverse sensors and water matrices, thereby ensuring reliable real-world applications. Moreover, the framework serves as a benchmark for future sensor validation studies, enhancing comparability, reproducibility, and standardization in water quality monitoring research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100257,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Water","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Framework for evaluating the performance of water quality sensors\",\"authors\":\"Nidhi Sahu,&nbsp;Atul Maldhure\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clwat.2025.100144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ensuring water quality requires continuous monitoring and assessment. Traditional approaches, based on manual sampling and laboratory analysis, are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly. Sensor-based technologies offer real-time water quality monitoring with high sensitivity, selectivity, cost-effectiveness, and operational efficiency. However, before field deployment, sensors must undergo rigorous validation to ensure accuracy, reliability, and long-term performance. Implementing validation protocols is essential to achieve consistency, reproducibility, and comparability of sensor performance across diverse monitoring locations and environmental conditions. This study proposes a structured validation framework, providing a systematic methodology to evaluate water quality sensors. To demonstrate its applicability, a commercially procured pH sensor was validated under controlled laboratory conditions using standard buffer solutions. The results indicate that the sensor showed the accuracy of 97.58 % in the acidic range (pH 1–6), 98.84 % at neutral pH (pH 7), and 94.38 % in the basic range (pH 8–14). Precision analysis showed intraday variability between 0.89–1.75 % RSD and interday variability between 0.71–2.85 % RSD, with strong linearity (R² = 0.9988), confirming consistent and reproducible performance. These results confirm that standards-based validation offers assurance of the sensor’s operational reliability and accuracy. While validation with standards is a critical first step, comprehensive assessment requires testing across different water matrices, where complex ionic composition, organic matter, and interfering species may influence sensor performance. To ensure sustained performance, it is also recommended that the sensor undergo field validation following installation and be periodically reassessed, typically every six months. This study establishes the foundation for a robust validation framework that can be extended to diverse sensors and water matrices, thereby ensuring reliable real-world applications. Moreover, the framework serves as a benchmark for future sensor validation studies, enhancing comparability, reproducibility, and standardization in water quality monitoring research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleaner Water\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleaner Water\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263225000821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950263225000821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确保水质需要持续监测和评估。基于人工采样和实验室分析的传统方法耗时、劳动密集且成本高昂。基于传感器的技术提供了高灵敏度、选择性、成本效益和操作效率的实时水质监测。然而,在现场部署之前,传感器必须经过严格的验证,以确保准确性、可靠性和长期性能。实现验证协议对于在不同的监测位置和环境条件下实现传感器性能的一致性、可重复性和可比性至关重要。本研究提出了一个结构化的验证框架,提供了一个系统的方法来评估水质传感器。为了证明其适用性,在受控的实验室条件下,使用标准缓冲溶液验证了商业采购的pH传感器。结果表明,该传感器在酸性范围(pH 1 ~ 6)的准确度为97.58 %,在中性pH (pH 7)的准确度为98.84 %,在碱性范围(pH 8 ~ 14)的准确度为94.38 %。精密度分析显示,日内变异率为0.89 ~ 1.75 % RSD,日内变异率为0.71 ~ 2.85 % RSD,具有较强的线性关系(R²= 0.9988),具有一致性和重复性。这些结果证实,基于标准的验证为传感器的运行可靠性和准确性提供了保证。虽然标准验证是关键的第一步,但综合评估需要在不同的水基质中进行测试,其中复杂的离子组成、有机物和干扰物质可能会影响传感器的性能。为了确保持续的性能,还建议传感器在安装后进行现场验证,并定期重新评估,通常每六个月进行一次。本研究为一个强大的验证框架奠定了基础,该框架可以扩展到不同的传感器和水矩阵,从而确保可靠的实际应用。此外,该框架可作为未来传感器验证研究的基准,增强水质监测研究的可比性、可重复性和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Framework for evaluating the performance of water quality sensors
Ensuring water quality requires continuous monitoring and assessment. Traditional approaches, based on manual sampling and laboratory analysis, are time-consuming, labour-intensive, and costly. Sensor-based technologies offer real-time water quality monitoring with high sensitivity, selectivity, cost-effectiveness, and operational efficiency. However, before field deployment, sensors must undergo rigorous validation to ensure accuracy, reliability, and long-term performance. Implementing validation protocols is essential to achieve consistency, reproducibility, and comparability of sensor performance across diverse monitoring locations and environmental conditions. This study proposes a structured validation framework, providing a systematic methodology to evaluate water quality sensors. To demonstrate its applicability, a commercially procured pH sensor was validated under controlled laboratory conditions using standard buffer solutions. The results indicate that the sensor showed the accuracy of 97.58 % in the acidic range (pH 1–6), 98.84 % at neutral pH (pH 7), and 94.38 % in the basic range (pH 8–14). Precision analysis showed intraday variability between 0.89–1.75 % RSD and interday variability between 0.71–2.85 % RSD, with strong linearity (R² = 0.9988), confirming consistent and reproducible performance. These results confirm that standards-based validation offers assurance of the sensor’s operational reliability and accuracy. While validation with standards is a critical first step, comprehensive assessment requires testing across different water matrices, where complex ionic composition, organic matter, and interfering species may influence sensor performance. To ensure sustained performance, it is also recommended that the sensor undergo field validation following installation and be periodically reassessed, typically every six months. This study establishes the foundation for a robust validation framework that can be extended to diverse sensors and water matrices, thereby ensuring reliable real-world applications. Moreover, the framework serves as a benchmark for future sensor validation studies, enhancing comparability, reproducibility, and standardization in water quality monitoring research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信