慕尼黑城市绿色基础设施发展中的城市-公民社会动态:治理特征及其影响

Elizaveta Fakirova , Martina van Lierop , Hade Dorst , Stephan Pauleit
{"title":"慕尼黑城市绿色基础设施发展中的城市-公民社会动态:治理特征及其影响","authors":"Elizaveta Fakirova ,&nbsp;Martina van Lierop ,&nbsp;Hade Dorst ,&nbsp;Stephan Pauleit","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global climate change and urbanization exacerbate challenges like biodiversity loss and environmental injustice. Urban green infrastructure (UGI) offers ecological, social, and economic benefits, fostering resilient and sustainable cities. However, UGI development is significantly hindered by the limited collaboration between governmental and non-governmental actors.</div><div>Market, state, third sector and civil society engage in UGI governance modes that range from hierarchical to non-hierarchical. The interplay between city administrations and civil society is particularly crucial, as it enhances democratic decision-making, transparency, and alignment with strategic UGI planning goals.</div><div>Applying the Environmental Governance Framework, this study analyzes seven UGI interventions in Munich representing different governance modes to explore the factors influencing city-civil society interactions throughout the UGI development.</div><div>Four shared factors emerged: limited information distribution during idea development, which plays a dual role as both a barrier and an enabler, knowledge ownership, limited motivation to collaborate during implementation, and ambiguity in responsibilities spanning both implementation and management phases.</div><div>The study highlights the role of spatial factors in shaping actor arrangements and reveals that governance modes shift throughout the UGI development process, underscoring the importance of prioritizing shared barriers, as they impact both governance modes.</div><div>To enhance city-civil society interactions, we advocate for a systems thinking approach that prioritises shared factors while moving beyond addressing barriers in isolation toward a systemic understanding of governance interactions.</div><div>This approach supports scholars and practitioners in identifying pathways to enhance city-civil society interactions, ultimately contributing to more adaptive and inclusive UGI governance, regardless of the governance mode in place.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"City-civil society dynamics in urban green infrastructure development in Munich: governance features and their impacts\",\"authors\":\"Elizaveta Fakirova ,&nbsp;Martina van Lierop ,&nbsp;Hade Dorst ,&nbsp;Stephan Pauleit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Global climate change and urbanization exacerbate challenges like biodiversity loss and environmental injustice. Urban green infrastructure (UGI) offers ecological, social, and economic benefits, fostering resilient and sustainable cities. However, UGI development is significantly hindered by the limited collaboration between governmental and non-governmental actors.</div><div>Market, state, third sector and civil society engage in UGI governance modes that range from hierarchical to non-hierarchical. The interplay between city administrations and civil society is particularly crucial, as it enhances democratic decision-making, transparency, and alignment with strategic UGI planning goals.</div><div>Applying the Environmental Governance Framework, this study analyzes seven UGI interventions in Munich representing different governance modes to explore the factors influencing city-civil society interactions throughout the UGI development.</div><div>Four shared factors emerged: limited information distribution during idea development, which plays a dual role as both a barrier and an enabler, knowledge ownership, limited motivation to collaborate during implementation, and ambiguity in responsibilities spanning both implementation and management phases.</div><div>The study highlights the role of spatial factors in shaping actor arrangements and reveals that governance modes shift throughout the UGI development process, underscoring the importance of prioritizing shared barriers, as they impact both governance modes.</div><div>To enhance city-civil society interactions, we advocate for a systems thinking approach that prioritises shared factors while moving beyond addressing barriers in isolation toward a systemic understanding of governance interactions.</div><div>This approach supports scholars and practitioners in identifying pathways to enhance city-civil society interactions, ultimately contributing to more adaptive and inclusive UGI governance, regardless of the governance mode in place.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature-Based Solutions\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature-Based Solutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411525000606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球气候变化和城市化加剧了生物多样性丧失和环境不公正等挑战。城市绿色基础设施(UGI)提供生态、社会和经济效益,培育有弹性和可持续发展的城市。但是,政府和非政府行动者之间有限的合作严重阻碍了UGI的发展。市场、国家、第三部门和民间社会参与的UGI治理模式从等级到非等级不等。城市管理部门与公民社会之间的相互作用尤为重要,因为它增强了民主决策、透明度,并与全球城市倡议的战略规划目标保持一致。本研究运用环境治理框架,分析了代表不同治理模式的慕尼黑UGI的七种干预措施,以探索在UGI发展过程中影响城市-公民社会互动的因素。出现了四个共同的因素:在想法发展过程中有限的信息分发,它既是障碍又是推动者,知识所有权,在实施过程中有限的合作动机,以及跨越实施和管理阶段的责任模糊。该研究强调了空间因素在塑造行动者安排中的作用,并揭示了治理模式在整个UGI发展过程中发生变化,强调了优先考虑共享障碍的重要性,因为它们会影响两种治理模式。为了加强城市与公民社会的互动,我们提倡采用一种系统思考方法,优先考虑共享因素,同时超越孤立地解决障碍,转向对治理互动的系统理解。该方法支持学者和实践者确定加强城市与公民社会互动的途径,最终促进更具适应性和包容性的UGI治理,而不管现有的治理模式如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
City-civil society dynamics in urban green infrastructure development in Munich: governance features and their impacts
Global climate change and urbanization exacerbate challenges like biodiversity loss and environmental injustice. Urban green infrastructure (UGI) offers ecological, social, and economic benefits, fostering resilient and sustainable cities. However, UGI development is significantly hindered by the limited collaboration between governmental and non-governmental actors.
Market, state, third sector and civil society engage in UGI governance modes that range from hierarchical to non-hierarchical. The interplay between city administrations and civil society is particularly crucial, as it enhances democratic decision-making, transparency, and alignment with strategic UGI planning goals.
Applying the Environmental Governance Framework, this study analyzes seven UGI interventions in Munich representing different governance modes to explore the factors influencing city-civil society interactions throughout the UGI development.
Four shared factors emerged: limited information distribution during idea development, which plays a dual role as both a barrier and an enabler, knowledge ownership, limited motivation to collaborate during implementation, and ambiguity in responsibilities spanning both implementation and management phases.
The study highlights the role of spatial factors in shaping actor arrangements and reveals that governance modes shift throughout the UGI development process, underscoring the importance of prioritizing shared barriers, as they impact both governance modes.
To enhance city-civil society interactions, we advocate for a systems thinking approach that prioritises shared factors while moving beyond addressing barriers in isolation toward a systemic understanding of governance interactions.
This approach supports scholars and practitioners in identifying pathways to enhance city-civil society interactions, ultimately contributing to more adaptive and inclusive UGI governance, regardless of the governance mode in place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信