创新的源泉还是算法的滥伐?人工智能对创业生态系统的影响

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Richard A. Hunt , Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu
{"title":"创新的源泉还是算法的滥伐?人工智能对创业生态系统的影响","authors":"Richard A. Hunt ,&nbsp;Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in the infrastructures, practices, and decision-making routines of founders, firms, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. For entrepreneurship, this appears to be a tremendous boon to value creation. By widening the aperture of individual entrepreneurs beyond the narrow limits of human cognition, assistive algorithms – and particularly the ground-breaking, readily accessible capabilities of Generative AI (Gen AI) – appear poised to deliver game-changing exploratory tools, enhanced predictive insights, operational efficiencies, and resource-preserving decision-support tools. Yet, the long-term, society-wide impacts are far less clear. One cause for concern is the variance-minimizing features of AI, a foundational design principle that reduces deviation and enhances the predictive stability of AI tools. In this, we identify a paradox wherein AI tools often enhance the individual creativity of entrepreneurs but, at scale, may erode collective entrepreneurial dynamism by filtering out non-algorithmic, highly serendipitous, mutation-generating, and variance-maximizing behaviors. Drawing upon the principles of <em>rainforest logics</em>, we theorize how AI's growing influence on entrepreneurial judgment, strategy, and ecosystem design may lead to a system-wide homogenization in decision-making and a decline in radical experimentation. With this, there is the danger of a corresponding increase in what we have dubbed <em>algorithmic deforestation</em>, involving systemic risks to the vitality and mutation-generating capacity of entrepreneurial ecosystems through the unintentional suppression of cognitive and behavioral diversity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article e00575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Font of innovation or algorithmic deforestation? The ecosystem impacts of artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship\",\"authors\":\"Richard A. Hunt ,&nbsp;Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvi.2025.e00575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in the infrastructures, practices, and decision-making routines of founders, firms, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. For entrepreneurship, this appears to be a tremendous boon to value creation. By widening the aperture of individual entrepreneurs beyond the narrow limits of human cognition, assistive algorithms – and particularly the ground-breaking, readily accessible capabilities of Generative AI (Gen AI) – appear poised to deliver game-changing exploratory tools, enhanced predictive insights, operational efficiencies, and resource-preserving decision-support tools. Yet, the long-term, society-wide impacts are far less clear. One cause for concern is the variance-minimizing features of AI, a foundational design principle that reduces deviation and enhances the predictive stability of AI tools. In this, we identify a paradox wherein AI tools often enhance the individual creativity of entrepreneurs but, at scale, may erode collective entrepreneurial dynamism by filtering out non-algorithmic, highly serendipitous, mutation-generating, and variance-maximizing behaviors. Drawing upon the principles of <em>rainforest logics</em>, we theorize how AI's growing influence on entrepreneurial judgment, strategy, and ecosystem design may lead to a system-wide homogenization in decision-making and a decline in radical experimentation. With this, there is the danger of a corresponding increase in what we have dubbed <em>algorithmic deforestation</em>, involving systemic risks to the vitality and mutation-generating capacity of entrepreneurial ecosystems through the unintentional suppression of cognitive and behavioral diversity.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673425000629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673425000629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)越来越多地嵌入到创始人、公司和创业生态系统的基础设施、实践和决策程序中。对于企业家来说,这似乎是价值创造的巨大福音。通过扩大个体企业家的视野,超越人类认知的狭隘限制,辅助算法——尤其是突破性的、容易获得的生成式人工智能(Gen AI)的能力——似乎准备好提供改变游戏规则的探索工具,增强预测洞察力,运营效率,以及节约资源的决策支持工具。然而,其对整个社会的长期影响远不那么明显。值得关注的一个原因是人工智能的方差最小化特性,这是一种基本的设计原则,可以减少偏差并提高人工智能工具的预测稳定性。在这方面,我们发现了一个悖论,即人工智能工具通常会增强企业家的个人创造力,但在规模上,可能会过滤掉非算法、高度偶然、产生突变和方差最大化的行为,从而削弱集体创业活力。根据热带雨林逻辑的原则,我们将人工智能对企业判断、战略和生态系统设计的影响越来越大,这可能导致整个系统的决策同质化,并导致激进实验的减少。这样一来,我们称之为“算法毁林”的危险就会相应增加,通过无意中抑制认知和行为多样性,对创业生态系统的活力和产生突变的能力构成系统性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Font of innovation or algorithmic deforestation? The ecosystem impacts of artificial intelligence in entrepreneurship
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in the infrastructures, practices, and decision-making routines of founders, firms, and entrepreneurial ecosystems. For entrepreneurship, this appears to be a tremendous boon to value creation. By widening the aperture of individual entrepreneurs beyond the narrow limits of human cognition, assistive algorithms – and particularly the ground-breaking, readily accessible capabilities of Generative AI (Gen AI) – appear poised to deliver game-changing exploratory tools, enhanced predictive insights, operational efficiencies, and resource-preserving decision-support tools. Yet, the long-term, society-wide impacts are far less clear. One cause for concern is the variance-minimizing features of AI, a foundational design principle that reduces deviation and enhances the predictive stability of AI tools. In this, we identify a paradox wherein AI tools often enhance the individual creativity of entrepreneurs but, at scale, may erode collective entrepreneurial dynamism by filtering out non-algorithmic, highly serendipitous, mutation-generating, and variance-maximizing behaviors. Drawing upon the principles of rainforest logics, we theorize how AI's growing influence on entrepreneurial judgment, strategy, and ecosystem design may lead to a system-wide homogenization in decision-making and a decline in radical experimentation. With this, there is the danger of a corresponding increase in what we have dubbed algorithmic deforestation, involving systemic risks to the vitality and mutation-generating capacity of entrepreneurial ecosystems through the unintentional suppression of cognitive and behavioral diversity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信