综合写作中句法复杂性的发展:对细粒度测量的关注

IF 5.5 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar , J. Elliott Casal , Hamideh Abolhasani
{"title":"综合写作中句法复杂性的发展:对细粒度测量的关注","authors":"Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar ,&nbsp;J. Elliott Casal ,&nbsp;Hamideh Abolhasani","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Past studies on complexity development in L2 writing have largely examined syntactic complexity, measured by traditional length-based measures, in independent writing, rather than integrated writing. The present research adds to the literature by investigating the development of clausal and phrasal indices of syntactic complexity in two integrated writing tasks (graph writing and summary writing) via fine-grained measures. The participants wrote three graph-based essays in the first semester, and three summary writing essays in the second semester. The results of mixed-effects modeling demonstrated significant changes in both phrasal and clausal complexity and syntactic variety at the phrasal level, evidencing growth towards a more phrasal complex academic style. Task type also had a significant impact on these measures; higher values were generally found in summary writing responses. The results are discussed in light of previous literature as well as the characteristics of the source texts, and theoretical and methodological implications for writing complexity research are offered.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100983"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development of syntactic complexity in integrated writing: A focus on fine-grained measures\",\"authors\":\"Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar ,&nbsp;J. Elliott Casal ,&nbsp;Hamideh Abolhasani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2025.100983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Past studies on complexity development in L2 writing have largely examined syntactic complexity, measured by traditional length-based measures, in independent writing, rather than integrated writing. The present research adds to the literature by investigating the development of clausal and phrasal indices of syntactic complexity in two integrated writing tasks (graph writing and summary writing) via fine-grained measures. The participants wrote three graph-based essays in the first semester, and three summary writing essays in the second semester. The results of mixed-effects modeling demonstrated significant changes in both phrasal and clausal complexity and syntactic variety at the phrasal level, evidencing growth towards a more phrasal complex academic style. Task type also had a significant impact on these measures; higher values were generally found in summary writing responses. The results are discussed in light of previous literature as well as the characteristics of the source texts, and theoretical and methodological implications for writing complexity research are offered.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000704\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293525000704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去关于二语写作复杂性发展的研究主要是研究独立写作中的句法复杂性,用传统的基于长度的方法来衡量,而不是综合写作。本研究在文献的基础上,通过细粒度测量研究了两种综合写作任务(图表写作和摘要写作)中句法复杂性的小句和短语指标的发展。参与者在第一学期写了三篇基于图表的论文,在第二学期写了三篇总结写作论文。混合效应建模的结果显示,短语和小句的复杂性以及短语层面的句法多样性都发生了显著变化,表明短语更加复杂的学术风格正在发展。任务类型对这些指标也有显著影响;通常在总结写作回答中发现较高的值。本文结合以往的文献以及源文本的特点对研究结果进行了讨论,并为写作复杂性研究提供了理论和方法上的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development of syntactic complexity in integrated writing: A focus on fine-grained measures
Past studies on complexity development in L2 writing have largely examined syntactic complexity, measured by traditional length-based measures, in independent writing, rather than integrated writing. The present research adds to the literature by investigating the development of clausal and phrasal indices of syntactic complexity in two integrated writing tasks (graph writing and summary writing) via fine-grained measures. The participants wrote three graph-based essays in the first semester, and three summary writing essays in the second semester. The results of mixed-effects modeling demonstrated significant changes in both phrasal and clausal complexity and syntactic variety at the phrasal level, evidencing growth towards a more phrasal complex academic style. Task type also had a significant impact on these measures; higher values were generally found in summary writing responses. The results are discussed in light of previous literature as well as the characteristics of the source texts, and theoretical and methodological implications for writing complexity research are offered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信