{"title":"PSMA免疫组化作为肝细胞癌的诊断生物标志物","authors":"Killian Véron , Etienne Becht , Astrid Laurent-Bellue , Rémy Nicolle , Miguel Albuquerque , Samira Laouirem , Hélène Cazier , Clément Bailly , Mohamed Bouattour , Mickaël Lesurtel , Catherine Guettier , Rachida Lebtahi , Valérie Vilgrain , Valérie Paradis , Jérôme Cros , Aurélie Beaufrère","doi":"10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background & Aims</h3><div>A combination of three immunohistological markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]) is routinely used to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but this panel’s sensitivity is suboptimal. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression for diagnosing HCC in a series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 320 hepatocellular nodules from 188 patients in a test cohort and 87 hepatocellular nodules from 48 patients in an external validation cohort distributed as follows: regenerative nodules (RN, n = 39+22), low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN, n = 38+16), high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN, n = 30+8), early HCC (≤2-cm nodules) (n = 107+24), HCC (n = 106+17), and corresponding non-tumour livers (NTL, n = 152+37). PSMA, HSP70, Glypican 3, and GS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. For each marker or combination of markers, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the test cohort, PSMA was expressed in 83% of HCC (n = 88/106), 77% of early HCC (n = 82/107), 27% of HGDN (n = 8/30), 21% of LGDN (n = 8/38), 18% of RN (n = 7/39), and 3% of NTL (n = 5/152). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA for HCC diagnosis were 0.95 and 0.77, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.83. The sensitivity and the specificity of the Glypican 3–HSP70–GS (≥2 positive markers) combination for HCC diagnosis were 0.41 and 0.99, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.80. Adding PSMA to this combination increased the sensitivity and accuracy to 0.85 and 0.86, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PSMA alone has shown good performance in diagnosing HCC, outperforming the combination of the three routinely used markers. When sufficient material is available, adding Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS to PSMA could be recommended.</div></div><div><h3>Impact and implications</h3><div>Differentiating hepatocellular nodules, particularly high-grade dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on histologic criteria remains challenging. In this study, we assess the diagnostic value of a new immunohistochemical marker, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), for diagnosing HCC in two independent series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]). PSMA alone has demonstrated good performance in diagnosing HCC, superior to the combination of the three routinely used markers, and could be useful in practice for differentiating difficult-to-classify hepatocellular nodules. When the material is sparse, using PSMA alone could be recommended, whereas when sufficient material is available, adding PSMA to Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS may be advised, as this combination has shown the best performance for HCC diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14764,"journal":{"name":"JHEP Reports","volume":"7 11","pages":"Article 101542"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PSMA immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Killian Véron , Etienne Becht , Astrid Laurent-Bellue , Rémy Nicolle , Miguel Albuquerque , Samira Laouirem , Hélène Cazier , Clément Bailly , Mohamed Bouattour , Mickaël Lesurtel , Catherine Guettier , Rachida Lebtahi , Valérie Vilgrain , Valérie Paradis , Jérôme Cros , Aurélie Beaufrère\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background & Aims</h3><div>A combination of three immunohistological markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]) is routinely used to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but this panel’s sensitivity is suboptimal. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression for diagnosing HCC in a series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 320 hepatocellular nodules from 188 patients in a test cohort and 87 hepatocellular nodules from 48 patients in an external validation cohort distributed as follows: regenerative nodules (RN, n = 39+22), low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN, n = 38+16), high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN, n = 30+8), early HCC (≤2-cm nodules) (n = 107+24), HCC (n = 106+17), and corresponding non-tumour livers (NTL, n = 152+37). PSMA, HSP70, Glypican 3, and GS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. For each marker or combination of markers, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the test cohort, PSMA was expressed in 83% of HCC (n = 88/106), 77% of early HCC (n = 82/107), 27% of HGDN (n = 8/30), 21% of LGDN (n = 8/38), 18% of RN (n = 7/39), and 3% of NTL (n = 5/152). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA for HCC diagnosis were 0.95 and 0.77, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.83. The sensitivity and the specificity of the Glypican 3–HSP70–GS (≥2 positive markers) combination for HCC diagnosis were 0.41 and 0.99, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.80. Adding PSMA to this combination increased the sensitivity and accuracy to 0.85 and 0.86, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>PSMA alone has shown good performance in diagnosing HCC, outperforming the combination of the three routinely used markers. When sufficient material is available, adding Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS to PSMA could be recommended.</div></div><div><h3>Impact and implications</h3><div>Differentiating hepatocellular nodules, particularly high-grade dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on histologic criteria remains challenging. In this study, we assess the diagnostic value of a new immunohistochemical marker, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), for diagnosing HCC in two independent series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]). PSMA alone has demonstrated good performance in diagnosing HCC, superior to the combination of the three routinely used markers, and could be useful in practice for differentiating difficult-to-classify hepatocellular nodules. When the material is sparse, using PSMA alone could be recommended, whereas when sufficient material is available, adding PSMA to Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS may be advised, as this combination has shown the best performance for HCC diagnosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JHEP Reports\",\"volume\":\"7 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 101542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JHEP Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555925002216\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHEP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589555925002216","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
PSMA immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma
Background & Aims
A combination of three immunohistological markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]) is routinely used to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but this panel’s sensitivity is suboptimal. Our aim was to assess the diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression for diagnosing HCC in a series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers.
Methods
We included 320 hepatocellular nodules from 188 patients in a test cohort and 87 hepatocellular nodules from 48 patients in an external validation cohort distributed as follows: regenerative nodules (RN, n = 39+22), low-grade dysplastic nodules (LGDN, n = 38+16), high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDN, n = 30+8), early HCC (≤2-cm nodules) (n = 107+24), HCC (n = 106+17), and corresponding non-tumour livers (NTL, n = 152+37). PSMA, HSP70, Glypican 3, and GS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. For each marker or combination of markers, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.
Results
In the test cohort, PSMA was expressed in 83% of HCC (n = 88/106), 77% of early HCC (n = 82/107), 27% of HGDN (n = 8/30), 21% of LGDN (n = 8/38), 18% of RN (n = 7/39), and 3% of NTL (n = 5/152). In the validation cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of PSMA for HCC diagnosis were 0.95 and 0.77, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.83. The sensitivity and the specificity of the Glypican 3–HSP70–GS (≥2 positive markers) combination for HCC diagnosis were 0.41 and 0.99, respectively, and its accuracy was 0.80. Adding PSMA to this combination increased the sensitivity and accuracy to 0.85 and 0.86, respectively.
Conclusions
PSMA alone has shown good performance in diagnosing HCC, outperforming the combination of the three routinely used markers. When sufficient material is available, adding Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS to PSMA could be recommended.
Impact and implications
Differentiating hepatocellular nodules, particularly high-grade dysplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), based on histologic criteria remains challenging. In this study, we assess the diagnostic value of a new immunohistochemical marker, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), for diagnosing HCC in two independent series of hepatocellular nodules and compare its performance with that of routinely used markers (Glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 [HSP70], and glutamine synthetase [GS]). PSMA alone has demonstrated good performance in diagnosing HCC, superior to the combination of the three routinely used markers, and could be useful in practice for differentiating difficult-to-classify hepatocellular nodules. When the material is sparse, using PSMA alone could be recommended, whereas when sufficient material is available, adding PSMA to Glypican 3, HSP70, and GS may be advised, as this combination has shown the best performance for HCC diagnosis.
期刊介绍:
JHEP Reports is an open access journal that is affiliated with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). It serves as a companion journal to the highly respected Journal of Hepatology.
The primary objective of JHEP Reports is to publish original papers and reviews that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of liver diseases. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including basic, translational, and clinical research. It also focuses on global issues in hepatology, with particular emphasis on areas such as clinical trials, novel diagnostics, precision medicine and therapeutics, cancer research, cellular and molecular studies, artificial intelligence, microbiome research, epidemiology, and cutting-edge technologies.
In summary, JHEP Reports is dedicated to promoting scientific discoveries and innovations in liver diseases through the publication of high-quality research papers and reviews covering various aspects of hepatology.