hfrp增强轨道复合板疲劳性能:试验与数值模拟

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Zhongzhi Guan , Hongguang Wang , Yuhang Ren , Guangzhu Zhang , Yongli Xu
{"title":"hfrp增强轨道复合板疲劳性能:试验与数值模拟","authors":"Zhongzhi Guan ,&nbsp;Hongguang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuhang Ren ,&nbsp;Guangzhu Zhang ,&nbsp;Yongli Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the risks of corrosion susceptibility and reduced electrical insulation in ballastless track structures during service life, replacing conventional steel bars with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars has emerged as a promising strategy. However, current research still lacks a comprehensive understanding of the fatigue evolution mechanisms across the structural layers of FRP-reinforced ballastless tracks when subjected to high-frequency train loads. This study conceptualizes the track slab and self-compacting concrete (SCC) filling layer as a track composite slab structure with equivalent service life. A three-point bending fatigue test was employed to investigate the effects of steel bars, basalt FRP (BFRP) bars, and hybrid FRP (HFRP) bars on fatigue failure modes, stiffness degradation patterns, and strain-slip responses of the track composite slab. Additionally, a constitutive model for concrete fatigue damage was developed and implemented via a user defined material (UMAT) subroutine within a finite element framework to elucidate track composite slab fatigue evolution mechanisms. Results demonstrate that HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs exhibit mid-span delamination failure after 1.32 million load cycles. Compared to BFRP-reinforced systems, HFRP-reinforced systems enhance fatigue life by 13.79 % and reduce stiffness degradation rates by 22.10 %. Numerical simulations reveal that fatigue damage in HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs initiates at slab edges, propagates gradiently through the thickness direction, and ultimately triggers interfacial cracking. Optimization of the track slab reinforcement ratio to 0.55 % achieves near-critical equilibrium in interlayer strain coordination, enhancing material efficiency while maintaining structural fatigue resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121471"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue performance of HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs: Experiments and numerical simulation\",\"authors\":\"Zhongzhi Guan ,&nbsp;Hongguang Wang ,&nbsp;Yuhang Ren ,&nbsp;Guangzhu Zhang ,&nbsp;Yongli Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To address the risks of corrosion susceptibility and reduced electrical insulation in ballastless track structures during service life, replacing conventional steel bars with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars has emerged as a promising strategy. However, current research still lacks a comprehensive understanding of the fatigue evolution mechanisms across the structural layers of FRP-reinforced ballastless tracks when subjected to high-frequency train loads. This study conceptualizes the track slab and self-compacting concrete (SCC) filling layer as a track composite slab structure with equivalent service life. A three-point bending fatigue test was employed to investigate the effects of steel bars, basalt FRP (BFRP) bars, and hybrid FRP (HFRP) bars on fatigue failure modes, stiffness degradation patterns, and strain-slip responses of the track composite slab. Additionally, a constitutive model for concrete fatigue damage was developed and implemented via a user defined material (UMAT) subroutine within a finite element framework to elucidate track composite slab fatigue evolution mechanisms. Results demonstrate that HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs exhibit mid-span delamination failure after 1.32 million load cycles. Compared to BFRP-reinforced systems, HFRP-reinforced systems enhance fatigue life by 13.79 % and reduce stiffness degradation rates by 22.10 %. Numerical simulations reveal that fatigue damage in HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs initiates at slab edges, propagates gradiently through the thickness direction, and ultimately triggers interfacial cracking. Optimization of the track slab reinforcement ratio to 0.55 % achieves near-critical equilibrium in interlayer strain coordination, enhancing material efficiency while maintaining structural fatigue resistance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"345 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625018620\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625018620","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了解决无砟轨道结构在使用寿命期间易受腐蚀和电气绝缘降低的风险,用纤维增强聚合物(FRP)钢筋代替传统钢筋已成为一种很有前景的策略。然而,目前的研究仍然缺乏对frp增强无砟轨道在高频列车荷载作用下跨结构层疲劳演化机制的全面认识。本研究将轨道板与自密实混凝土(SCC)填充层定义为具有等效使用寿命的轨道复合板结构。采用三点弯曲疲劳试验研究了钢筋、玄武岩FRP筋(BFRP)和混合FRP筋(HFRP)对轨道复合板疲劳破坏模式、刚度退化模式和应变-滑移响应的影响。此外,通过用户自定义材料(UMAT)子程序在有限元框架内开发并实现了混凝土疲劳损伤的本构模型,以阐明轨道复合材料板的疲劳演化机制。结果表明:在132万次荷载循环后,hfrp增强轨道复合板出现跨中分层破坏;与bfrp增强系统相比,hfrp增强系统的疲劳寿命提高了13.79 %,刚度退化率降低了22.10 %。数值模拟结果表明,hfrp增强轨道复合板的疲劳损伤从板边开始,沿厚度方向梯度扩展,最终引发界面开裂。轨道板配筋率优化为0.55 %时,层间应变协调接近临界平衡,在保持结构抗疲劳性能的同时提高了材料效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fatigue performance of HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs: Experiments and numerical simulation
To address the risks of corrosion susceptibility and reduced electrical insulation in ballastless track structures during service life, replacing conventional steel bars with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars has emerged as a promising strategy. However, current research still lacks a comprehensive understanding of the fatigue evolution mechanisms across the structural layers of FRP-reinforced ballastless tracks when subjected to high-frequency train loads. This study conceptualizes the track slab and self-compacting concrete (SCC) filling layer as a track composite slab structure with equivalent service life. A three-point bending fatigue test was employed to investigate the effects of steel bars, basalt FRP (BFRP) bars, and hybrid FRP (HFRP) bars on fatigue failure modes, stiffness degradation patterns, and strain-slip responses of the track composite slab. Additionally, a constitutive model for concrete fatigue damage was developed and implemented via a user defined material (UMAT) subroutine within a finite element framework to elucidate track composite slab fatigue evolution mechanisms. Results demonstrate that HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs exhibit mid-span delamination failure after 1.32 million load cycles. Compared to BFRP-reinforced systems, HFRP-reinforced systems enhance fatigue life by 13.79 % and reduce stiffness degradation rates by 22.10 %. Numerical simulations reveal that fatigue damage in HFRP-reinforced track composite slabs initiates at slab edges, propagates gradiently through the thickness direction, and ultimately triggers interfacial cracking. Optimization of the track slab reinforcement ratio to 0.55 % achieves near-critical equilibrium in interlayer strain coordination, enhancing material efficiency while maintaining structural fatigue resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信