OPC、GGBFS、粉煤灰三元粘结剂砂浆的可持续发展

IF 8 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Soumyaranjan Panda , Monalin Pradhan , Saubhagya Kumar Panigrahi
{"title":"OPC、GGBFS、粉煤灰三元粘结剂砂浆的可持续发展","authors":"Soumyaranjan Panda ,&nbsp;Monalin Pradhan ,&nbsp;Saubhagya Kumar Panigrahi","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The production of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) is responsible for 5–8 % of global CO₂ emissions and requires 4–5 GJ of energy per ton, emphasizing the need for sustainable alternatives. This study investigates a ternary blended binder mortar system composed of OPC, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and Coal Bottom Ash (CBA) to reduce clinker demand while improving performance. Six mixes were developed with a predefined 30 % GGBFS content, and OPC was progressively replaced with 5–25 % CBA. The mixes were evaluated for fresh, mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties, with statistical validation and sustainability assessments. The mix with 15 % CBA (OPC:GGBFS:CBA is 55:30:15) was identified as optimal, achieving an 8–10 % increase in compressive strength (with greater gains at later ages), up to 20 % improvement in durability indices, and denser microstructural development compared to the control mix. Sustainability analysis exhibited a 16.79 % reduction in embodied energy, 19.92 % lower CO₂ emissions, and 10.13 % cost savings. The novelty of this work lies in demonstrating the synergistic role of CBA with GGBFS in ternary systems, where CBA’s utilization improves both performance and sustainability in mortar applications. The findings establish OPC:GGBFS:CBA with a 55:30:15 proportion as an optimized and statistically validated mix; however, it is also revealing that CBA incorporation up to 20 % is permissible without compromising mix-performance. This confirms the potential of OPC–GGBFS–CBA blends as durable, cost-effective, and eco-efficient alternatives for sustainable mortar production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"496 ","pages":"Article 143862"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable development of ternary binder-based mortar using OPC, GGBFS, and Coal Bottom Ash\",\"authors\":\"Soumyaranjan Panda ,&nbsp;Monalin Pradhan ,&nbsp;Saubhagya Kumar Panigrahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.143862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The production of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) is responsible for 5–8 % of global CO₂ emissions and requires 4–5 GJ of energy per ton, emphasizing the need for sustainable alternatives. This study investigates a ternary blended binder mortar system composed of OPC, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and Coal Bottom Ash (CBA) to reduce clinker demand while improving performance. Six mixes were developed with a predefined 30 % GGBFS content, and OPC was progressively replaced with 5–25 % CBA. The mixes were evaluated for fresh, mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties, with statistical validation and sustainability assessments. The mix with 15 % CBA (OPC:GGBFS:CBA is 55:30:15) was identified as optimal, achieving an 8–10 % increase in compressive strength (with greater gains at later ages), up to 20 % improvement in durability indices, and denser microstructural development compared to the control mix. Sustainability analysis exhibited a 16.79 % reduction in embodied energy, 19.92 % lower CO₂ emissions, and 10.13 % cost savings. The novelty of this work lies in demonstrating the synergistic role of CBA with GGBFS in ternary systems, where CBA’s utilization improves both performance and sustainability in mortar applications. The findings establish OPC:GGBFS:CBA with a 55:30:15 proportion as an optimized and statistically validated mix; however, it is also revealing that CBA incorporation up to 20 % is permissible without compromising mix-performance. This confirms the potential of OPC–GGBFS–CBA blends as durable, cost-effective, and eco-efficient alternatives for sustainable mortar production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"volume\":\"496 \",\"pages\":\"Article 143862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction and Building Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825040139\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825040139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

普通波特兰水泥(OPC)的生产占全球二氧化碳排放量的5 - 8% %,每吨需要4-5吉焦的能源,这强调了可持续替代品的必要性。本文研究了一种由OPC、磨粒高炉渣(GGBFS)和煤底灰(CBA)组成的三元混合粘结砂浆体系,以减少熟料需求,同时提高性能。六种混合料的GGBFS含量预定义为30 %,OPC逐渐被5-25 %的CBA取代。通过统计验证和可持续性评估,对混合物的新鲜度、机械性能、耐久性和微观结构性能进行了评估。与对照混合料相比,含有15% % CBA (OPC:GGBFS:CBA为55:30:15)的混合料被认为是最佳混合料,抗压强度提高了8-10 %(年龄越大),耐久性指数提高了20 %,微观结构发展更致密。可持续性分析显示,隐含能源减少16.79 %,CO₂排放量降低19.92 %,成本节约10.13 %。这项工作的新颖之处在于证明了CBA与GGBFS在三元体系中的协同作用,其中CBA的利用提高了砂浆应用的性能和可持续性。结果表明,OPC:GGBFS:CBA的比例为55:30:15,是经统计学验证的最佳组合;然而,它也揭示了CBA掺入高达20% %是允许的,而不影响混合性能。这证实了OPC-GGBFS-CBA混合物作为可持续砂浆生产的耐用、经济、环保的替代品的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable development of ternary binder-based mortar using OPC, GGBFS, and Coal Bottom Ash
The production of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) is responsible for 5–8 % of global CO₂ emissions and requires 4–5 GJ of energy per ton, emphasizing the need for sustainable alternatives. This study investigates a ternary blended binder mortar system composed of OPC, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), and Coal Bottom Ash (CBA) to reduce clinker demand while improving performance. Six mixes were developed with a predefined 30 % GGBFS content, and OPC was progressively replaced with 5–25 % CBA. The mixes were evaluated for fresh, mechanical, durability, and microstructural properties, with statistical validation and sustainability assessments. The mix with 15 % CBA (OPC:GGBFS:CBA is 55:30:15) was identified as optimal, achieving an 8–10 % increase in compressive strength (with greater gains at later ages), up to 20 % improvement in durability indices, and denser microstructural development compared to the control mix. Sustainability analysis exhibited a 16.79 % reduction in embodied energy, 19.92 % lower CO₂ emissions, and 10.13 % cost savings. The novelty of this work lies in demonstrating the synergistic role of CBA with GGBFS in ternary systems, where CBA’s utilization improves both performance and sustainability in mortar applications. The findings establish OPC:GGBFS:CBA with a 55:30:15 proportion as an optimized and statistically validated mix; however, it is also revealing that CBA incorporation up to 20 % is permissible without compromising mix-performance. This confirms the potential of OPC–GGBFS–CBA blends as durable, cost-effective, and eco-efficient alternatives for sustainable mortar production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信