{"title":"圆端再生骨料混凝土不锈钢管短柱轴压特性研究","authors":"Zhibin Wang , Jingdong Tong , Fucheng Zhang , Hui Qu , Huailin Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recycled aggregate concrete-filled stainless steel tubular (RACFSST) columns combine aesthetic superiority with enhanced corrosion resistance, offering a sustainable alternative for coastal bridge piers. Axial compression tests were conducted on 14 specimens, evaluating stainless steel grades (Austenitic 304 vs. Duplex 2205) and aspect ratios (<em>B/D</em> = 1.44–1.92). Results revealed that round-ended RACFSST columns demonstrated a 129.6 %-higher axial compressive resistance compared to stainless steel tubular (SST) counterparts. A finite element model was implemented to study parametric effects and mechanisms of this column. Mechanistic analysis revealed that the round-ended RACFSST column exhibits higher load-carrying capacity, ductility, and confining stress than the column made with a carbon steel tube. Parametric analysis indicated that axial compressive resistances increase with higher concrete strength, SST yield strength, and steel ratio, but decrease with larger aspect ratio. Existing design methods underestimated the load-carrying capacity of round-ended RACFSST stub columns. New predictive methods were developed for axial compressive resistance, axial compressive stiffness, and peak strain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"345 ","pages":"Article 121484"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behaviour of round-ended recycled aggregate concrete-filled stainless steel tubular stub column under axial compression\",\"authors\":\"Zhibin Wang , Jingdong Tong , Fucheng Zhang , Hui Qu , Huailin Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Recycled aggregate concrete-filled stainless steel tubular (RACFSST) columns combine aesthetic superiority with enhanced corrosion resistance, offering a sustainable alternative for coastal bridge piers. Axial compression tests were conducted on 14 specimens, evaluating stainless steel grades (Austenitic 304 vs. Duplex 2205) and aspect ratios (<em>B/D</em> = 1.44–1.92). Results revealed that round-ended RACFSST columns demonstrated a 129.6 %-higher axial compressive resistance compared to stainless steel tubular (SST) counterparts. A finite element model was implemented to study parametric effects and mechanisms of this column. Mechanistic analysis revealed that the round-ended RACFSST column exhibits higher load-carrying capacity, ductility, and confining stress than the column made with a carbon steel tube. Parametric analysis indicated that axial compressive resistances increase with higher concrete strength, SST yield strength, and steel ratio, but decrease with larger aspect ratio. Existing design methods underestimated the load-carrying capacity of round-ended RACFSST stub columns. New predictive methods were developed for axial compressive resistance, axial compressive stiffness, and peak strain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"345 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625018759\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625018759","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Behaviour of round-ended recycled aggregate concrete-filled stainless steel tubular stub column under axial compression
Recycled aggregate concrete-filled stainless steel tubular (RACFSST) columns combine aesthetic superiority with enhanced corrosion resistance, offering a sustainable alternative for coastal bridge piers. Axial compression tests were conducted on 14 specimens, evaluating stainless steel grades (Austenitic 304 vs. Duplex 2205) and aspect ratios (B/D = 1.44–1.92). Results revealed that round-ended RACFSST columns demonstrated a 129.6 %-higher axial compressive resistance compared to stainless steel tubular (SST) counterparts. A finite element model was implemented to study parametric effects and mechanisms of this column. Mechanistic analysis revealed that the round-ended RACFSST column exhibits higher load-carrying capacity, ductility, and confining stress than the column made with a carbon steel tube. Parametric analysis indicated that axial compressive resistances increase with higher concrete strength, SST yield strength, and steel ratio, but decrease with larger aspect ratio. Existing design methods underestimated the load-carrying capacity of round-ended RACFSST stub columns. New predictive methods were developed for axial compressive resistance, axial compressive stiffness, and peak strain.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.