卡诺电池系统的动态行为和控制效果:前馈、PID和组合控制方法的比较研究

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Yong-qiang Feng , Yu-zhe Wu , Yong-zhen Wang , Zhi-nan Liu , Xing-xing Wang , Shi-long Tian , Zhi-xia He , Qian Wang
{"title":"卡诺电池系统的动态行为和控制效果:前馈、PID和组合控制方法的比较研究","authors":"Yong-qiang Feng ,&nbsp;Yu-zhe Wu ,&nbsp;Yong-zhen Wang ,&nbsp;Zhi-nan Liu ,&nbsp;Xing-xing Wang ,&nbsp;Shi-long Tian ,&nbsp;Zhi-xia He ,&nbsp;Qian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study establishes a dynamic model of a Carnot Battery (CB) system to analyze the response of key parameters (evaporating pressure, superheat degree, and mass flow rate) to step and periodic heat source fluctuations under two control strategies (compressor input work control and ORC superheat degree control). Three control methods (feedforward, PID, and combined control) are comparatively evaluated in terms of system performance, response time, and stability. Results show that without control, the superheat degree is most sensitive to fluctuations, while mass flow rate is least affected. When the temperature step ratio is 6 %, under ORC superheat control, the superheat and mass flow rate of the ORC system increase by 198 % and 646 % respectively, thereby increasing the net output power by 880 %. Meanwhile, the HP system shows a 35 % and 28 % increase in evaporating pressure and superheat degree under compressor input control. The combined control method delivers the fastest dynamic response (11.53 s for HP, 33.06 s for ORC), outperforming PID by over 55 % and 30 %, respectively. Periodic fluctuation tests reveal increasing evaporating pressure overshoot in the HP system and decreasing overshoot in the ORC system with longer cycles. The superheat degree control strategy reduces levelized cost of storage (LCOS) by 0.0083 $/kWh and increases energy storage capacity (ESC) by 0.112 kWh/t, while enhances the available energy ratio (AER) by 49.7 t. These findings highlight the superheat degree control strategy, especially for combined control, as the most effective approach for enhancing the dynamic, economic, and environmental performance of CB systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"337 ","pages":"Article 138653"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic behavior and control efficacy in carnot battery systems: A comparative study of feedforward, PID, and combined control methods\",\"authors\":\"Yong-qiang Feng ,&nbsp;Yu-zhe Wu ,&nbsp;Yong-zhen Wang ,&nbsp;Zhi-nan Liu ,&nbsp;Xing-xing Wang ,&nbsp;Shi-long Tian ,&nbsp;Zhi-xia He ,&nbsp;Qian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.energy.2025.138653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study establishes a dynamic model of a Carnot Battery (CB) system to analyze the response of key parameters (evaporating pressure, superheat degree, and mass flow rate) to step and periodic heat source fluctuations under two control strategies (compressor input work control and ORC superheat degree control). Three control methods (feedforward, PID, and combined control) are comparatively evaluated in terms of system performance, response time, and stability. Results show that without control, the superheat degree is most sensitive to fluctuations, while mass flow rate is least affected. When the temperature step ratio is 6 %, under ORC superheat control, the superheat and mass flow rate of the ORC system increase by 198 % and 646 % respectively, thereby increasing the net output power by 880 %. Meanwhile, the HP system shows a 35 % and 28 % increase in evaporating pressure and superheat degree under compressor input control. The combined control method delivers the fastest dynamic response (11.53 s for HP, 33.06 s for ORC), outperforming PID by over 55 % and 30 %, respectively. Periodic fluctuation tests reveal increasing evaporating pressure overshoot in the HP system and decreasing overshoot in the ORC system with longer cycles. The superheat degree control strategy reduces levelized cost of storage (LCOS) by 0.0083 $/kWh and increases energy storage capacity (ESC) by 0.112 kWh/t, while enhances the available energy ratio (AER) by 49.7 t. These findings highlight the superheat degree control strategy, especially for combined control, as the most effective approach for enhancing the dynamic, economic, and environmental performance of CB systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy\",\"volume\":\"337 \",\"pages\":\"Article 138653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225042951\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225042951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文建立了卡诺电池(CB)系统的动态模型,分析了在压缩机输入功控制和ORC过热度控制两种控制策略下,关键参数(蒸发压力、过热度和质量流量)对热源阶跃和周期性波动的响应。对三种控制方法(前馈、PID和组合控制)在系统性能、响应时间和稳定性方面进行了比较评价。结果表明,在不加控制的情况下,过热度对波动最敏感,而质量流量对波动影响最小。当温度阶跃比为6%时,在ORC过热量控制下,ORC系统的过热量和质量流量分别提高了198%和646%,从而使净输出功率提高了880%。同时,在压缩机输入控制下,高压系统的蒸发压力和过热度分别提高了35%和28%。组合控制方法提供最快的动态响应(HP为11.53秒,ORC为33.06秒),分别优于PID 55%和30%以上。周期波动试验表明,随着循环周期的延长,高压系统蒸发压力超调量增大,ORC系统蒸发压力超调量减小。研究结果表明,过热度控制策略(特别是组合控制)是提高CB系统动态性能、经济性和环境性能的最有效方法,可使CB系统的平准化储能成本(LCOS)降低0.0083美元/千瓦时,储能容量(ESC)提高0.112千瓦时/千瓦时,有效能比(AER)提高49.7千瓦时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic behavior and control efficacy in carnot battery systems: A comparative study of feedforward, PID, and combined control methods
This study establishes a dynamic model of a Carnot Battery (CB) system to analyze the response of key parameters (evaporating pressure, superheat degree, and mass flow rate) to step and periodic heat source fluctuations under two control strategies (compressor input work control and ORC superheat degree control). Three control methods (feedforward, PID, and combined control) are comparatively evaluated in terms of system performance, response time, and stability. Results show that without control, the superheat degree is most sensitive to fluctuations, while mass flow rate is least affected. When the temperature step ratio is 6 %, under ORC superheat control, the superheat and mass flow rate of the ORC system increase by 198 % and 646 % respectively, thereby increasing the net output power by 880 %. Meanwhile, the HP system shows a 35 % and 28 % increase in evaporating pressure and superheat degree under compressor input control. The combined control method delivers the fastest dynamic response (11.53 s for HP, 33.06 s for ORC), outperforming PID by over 55 % and 30 %, respectively. Periodic fluctuation tests reveal increasing evaporating pressure overshoot in the HP system and decreasing overshoot in the ORC system with longer cycles. The superheat degree control strategy reduces levelized cost of storage (LCOS) by 0.0083 $/kWh and increases energy storage capacity (ESC) by 0.112 kWh/t, while enhances the available energy ratio (AER) by 49.7 t. These findings highlight the superheat degree control strategy, especially for combined control, as the most effective approach for enhancing the dynamic, economic, and environmental performance of CB systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信