OpenET模型估算亚利桑那州灌溉紫花苜蓿土壤耗水量的评价与比较

IF 6.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Said Attalah , Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek , Peter Waller , Douglas J. Hunsaker , Kelly R. Thorp , Eduardo Bautista , Clinton Williams , Gerard Wall , Ethan Orr , Diaa Eldin M. Elshikha
{"title":"OpenET模型估算亚利桑那州灌溉紫花苜蓿土壤耗水量的评价与比较","authors":"Said Attalah ,&nbsp;Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek ,&nbsp;Peter Waller ,&nbsp;Douglas J. Hunsaker ,&nbsp;Kelly R. Thorp ,&nbsp;Eduardo Bautista ,&nbsp;Clinton Williams ,&nbsp;Gerard Wall ,&nbsp;Ethan Orr ,&nbsp;Diaa Eldin M. Elshikha","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growers in arid regions often estimate soil water depletion (D<sub>r</sub>) of the root zone in making irrigation scheduling decisions. While growers might use soil water sensors, actual D<sub>r</sub> in fields may be only vaguely assessed. In this study, daily crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>sat</sub>) data from the six OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the OpenET ensemble were incorporated into a soil water balance (SWB) to estimate D<sub>r</sub> (D<sub>r sat</sub>) for alfalfa (<em>Medicago sativa</em> L.) within a 46-ha, center-pivot field in Buckeye, Arizona. A daily SWB for each model input the average ET<sub>sat</sub> data acquired at four locations for both 30-m and 90-m pixel sizes, assuming an alfalfa root-zone of 1.8-m. Net irrigation (I<sub>n</sub>) inputs were based on gross irrigation amounts, modified for evaporation losses using weather data from the AZMET station in Buckeye. D<sub>r sat</sub> values were compared to the average observed root-zone D<sub>r</sub> (D<sub>r obs</sub>), as determined at the four locations by neutron moisture meter measurements on 21 dates between 05/23/2023 and 12/11/2023. Cumulative values were 841 mm for I<sub>n</sub> plus effective precipitation, 776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI) to 1130 mm (SSEBop) for ET<sub>sat</sub>, and 816 mm of ET obtained by a seasonal SWB (ET<sub>swb</sub>) based on the average change in D<sub>r obs</sub> (ΔD<sub>r obs</sub>) from first to last measurements. Average D<sub>r obs</sub> fluctuated between 59 and 133 mm, and ΔD<sub>r obs</sub> was −25.0 ± 42.0 mm. Model variations in ET<sub>sat</sub> resulted in different estimates of D<sub>r sat</sub> and agreements, where mean bias error (MBE) ranged from ≈ -35 % (PT-JPL) to 195 % (SSEBop). Despite notable uncertainties in the SWB parameters and observed data, the SWB based on both the ensemble and ALEXI/DisALEXI ET<sub>sat</sub> capably tracked D<sub>r obs</sub> for most of the observations, excluding those made from late-July to mid-August. However, the best overall agreement was with the ensemble data, where differences between cumulative ET<sub>sat</sub> and ET<sub>swb</sub> and ΔD<sub>r sat</sub> and ΔD<sub>r obs</sub> were small, and MBE for D<sub>r sat</sub> was less than 9 % and 15 % at 30-m and 90-m pixels, respectively. Findings suggest that using the single value OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating the D<sub>r</sub> in arid climate alfalfa fields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 109850"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona\",\"authors\":\"Said Attalah ,&nbsp;Elsayed Ahmed Elsadek ,&nbsp;Peter Waller ,&nbsp;Douglas J. Hunsaker ,&nbsp;Kelly R. Thorp ,&nbsp;Eduardo Bautista ,&nbsp;Clinton Williams ,&nbsp;Gerard Wall ,&nbsp;Ethan Orr ,&nbsp;Diaa Eldin M. Elshikha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Growers in arid regions often estimate soil water depletion (D<sub>r</sub>) of the root zone in making irrigation scheduling decisions. While growers might use soil water sensors, actual D<sub>r</sub> in fields may be only vaguely assessed. In this study, daily crop evapotranspiration (ET<sub>sat</sub>) data from the six OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the OpenET ensemble were incorporated into a soil water balance (SWB) to estimate D<sub>r</sub> (D<sub>r sat</sub>) for alfalfa (<em>Medicago sativa</em> L.) within a 46-ha, center-pivot field in Buckeye, Arizona. A daily SWB for each model input the average ET<sub>sat</sub> data acquired at four locations for both 30-m and 90-m pixel sizes, assuming an alfalfa root-zone of 1.8-m. Net irrigation (I<sub>n</sub>) inputs were based on gross irrigation amounts, modified for evaporation losses using weather data from the AZMET station in Buckeye. D<sub>r sat</sub> values were compared to the average observed root-zone D<sub>r</sub> (D<sub>r obs</sub>), as determined at the four locations by neutron moisture meter measurements on 21 dates between 05/23/2023 and 12/11/2023. Cumulative values were 841 mm for I<sub>n</sub> plus effective precipitation, 776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI) to 1130 mm (SSEBop) for ET<sub>sat</sub>, and 816 mm of ET obtained by a seasonal SWB (ET<sub>swb</sub>) based on the average change in D<sub>r obs</sub> (ΔD<sub>r obs</sub>) from first to last measurements. Average D<sub>r obs</sub> fluctuated between 59 and 133 mm, and ΔD<sub>r obs</sub> was −25.0 ± 42.0 mm. Model variations in ET<sub>sat</sub> resulted in different estimates of D<sub>r sat</sub> and agreements, where mean bias error (MBE) ranged from ≈ -35 % (PT-JPL) to 195 % (SSEBop). Despite notable uncertainties in the SWB parameters and observed data, the SWB based on both the ensemble and ALEXI/DisALEXI ET<sub>sat</sub> capably tracked D<sub>r obs</sub> for most of the observations, excluding those made from late-July to mid-August. However, the best overall agreement was with the ensemble data, where differences between cumulative ET<sub>sat</sub> and ET<sub>swb</sub> and ΔD<sub>r sat</sub> and ΔD<sub>r obs</sub> were small, and MBE for D<sub>r sat</sub> was less than 9 % and 15 % at 30-m and 90-m pixels, respectively. Findings suggest that using the single value OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating the D<sub>r</sub> in arid climate alfalfa fields.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"volume\":\"320 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Water Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005645\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377425005645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干旱地区的种植者在制定灌溉计划时经常估算根区土壤水分损耗(Dr)。虽然种植者可能会使用土壤水分传感器,但实际的田间Dr可能只是模糊的评估。在这项研究中,来自6个基于OpenET卫星模型(ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop)的作物日蒸散(ETsat)数据和OpenET集合被纳入土壤水分平衡(SWB)中,以估计亚利桑那州Buckeye 46公顷中心枢纽田内紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)的Dr (Dr sat)。每个模型的每日SWB输入在四个地点获得的平均ETsat数据,分别为30米和90米像素大小,假设苜蓿根区为1.8米。净灌溉(In)投入基于总灌溉量,并根据七叶树AZMET站的天气数据对蒸发损失进行了修改。在2023年5月23日至2023年11月12日的21个日期,通过中子湿度计在四个地点测量了Dr sat值,并将其与观测到的根区Dr (Dr obs)进行了比较。In加上有效降水的累积值为841 mm, ETsat的累积值为776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI)至1130 mm (SSEBop),基于Dr obs (ΔDr obs)从第一次到最后一次测量的平均变化的季节性SWB (ETswb)获得的ET为816 mm。平均Dr obs在59 ~ 133 mm之间波动,ΔDr obs为−25.0 ± 42.0 mm。ETsat模型的变化导致了Dr sat和协议的不同估计,其中平均偏倚误差(MBE)的范围从≈ -35 % (PT-JPL)到195 % (SSEBop)。尽管SWB参数和观测数据存在明显的不确定性,但基于集合和ALEXI/DisALEXI ETsat的SWB能够跟踪obs博士的大部分观测,不包括7月下旬至8月中旬的观测。然而,总体上最一致的是集合数据,累积ETsat和ETswb以及ΔDr sat和ΔDr obs之间的差异很小,Dr sat的MBE分别小于9 %和15 %,在30 m和90 m像素处。结果表明,利用单值OpenET集合日蒸散发可作为估算干旱气候紫花苜蓿田Dr的可靠来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and comparison of OpenET models for estimating soil water depletion of irrigated alfalfa in Arizona
Growers in arid regions often estimate soil water depletion (Dr) of the root zone in making irrigation scheduling decisions. While growers might use soil water sensors, actual Dr in fields may be only vaguely assessed. In this study, daily crop evapotranspiration (ETsat) data from the six OpenET satellite-based models (ALEXI/DisALEXI, eeMETRIC, geeSEBAL, PT-JPL, SIMS, SSEBop) and the OpenET ensemble were incorporated into a soil water balance (SWB) to estimate Dr (Dr sat) for alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) within a 46-ha, center-pivot field in Buckeye, Arizona. A daily SWB for each model input the average ETsat data acquired at four locations for both 30-m and 90-m pixel sizes, assuming an alfalfa root-zone of 1.8-m. Net irrigation (In) inputs were based on gross irrigation amounts, modified for evaporation losses using weather data from the AZMET station in Buckeye. Dr sat values were compared to the average observed root-zone Dr (Dr obs), as determined at the four locations by neutron moisture meter measurements on 21 dates between 05/23/2023 and 12/11/2023. Cumulative values were 841 mm for In plus effective precipitation, 776 mm (ALEXI/DisALEXI) to 1130 mm (SSEBop) for ETsat, and 816 mm of ET obtained by a seasonal SWB (ETswb) based on the average change in Dr obs (ΔDr obs) from first to last measurements. Average Dr obs fluctuated between 59 and 133 mm, and ΔDr obs was −25.0 ± 42.0 mm. Model variations in ETsat resulted in different estimates of Dr sat and agreements, where mean bias error (MBE) ranged from ≈ -35 % (PT-JPL) to 195 % (SSEBop). Despite notable uncertainties in the SWB parameters and observed data, the SWB based on both the ensemble and ALEXI/DisALEXI ETsat capably tracked Dr obs for most of the observations, excluding those made from late-July to mid-August. However, the best overall agreement was with the ensemble data, where differences between cumulative ETsat and ETswb and ΔDr sat and ΔDr obs were small, and MBE for Dr sat was less than 9 % and 15 % at 30-m and 90-m pixels, respectively. Findings suggest that using the single value OpenET ensemble daily ET could be a reliable source for estimating the Dr in arid climate alfalfa fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信