{"title":"释放协同效应:中国节能规制下企业绿色创新决策的协同演化机制","authors":"Wen Hu , Xiaoxu Zhang , Jiehong Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy-saving regulations are commonly implemented in developing countries to reduce energy consumption and enhance efficiency. Yet, their effectiveness is often limited as regulated enterprises may prioritize output reductions over enhancements in energy efficiency due to the regulations' failure to incentivize green innovation. Prior research debates the direct impacts of such regulations on green innovation, with mixed findings, often overlooking the competitive dynamics between enterprises and indirect impacts on unregulated enterprises, which can bias results and harm overall energy conservation efforts. In this study, using China's two national energy-saving initiatives as prototypes, we introduce a two-player evolutionary game model to analyze both the direct and indirect impacts of these regulations. This model deconstructs competitive dynamics into production competition and green innovation competition, and identifies key conditions under which regulations can achieve dual goals, highlighting a strong convergence effect and an appropriate regulatory intensity that slightly below the threshold. Through heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses, our findings suggest that targeting enterprises with high energy efficiency, industries with significant market concentration, enhancing innovation intention before regulation, and amplifying the market benefits of green innovation effectively promote green innovation. Our framework offers insights for optimizing energy-saving regulations to unlock synergy between reducing energy consumption and enhancing energy efficiency, as well as fostering green innovation among both regulated and unregulated enterprises.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108920"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking synergy: The coevolution mechanism of enterprises' green innovation decisions under China's energy-saving regulations\",\"authors\":\"Wen Hu , Xiaoxu Zhang , Jiehong Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy-saving regulations are commonly implemented in developing countries to reduce energy consumption and enhance efficiency. Yet, their effectiveness is often limited as regulated enterprises may prioritize output reductions over enhancements in energy efficiency due to the regulations' failure to incentivize green innovation. Prior research debates the direct impacts of such regulations on green innovation, with mixed findings, often overlooking the competitive dynamics between enterprises and indirect impacts on unregulated enterprises, which can bias results and harm overall energy conservation efforts. In this study, using China's two national energy-saving initiatives as prototypes, we introduce a two-player evolutionary game model to analyze both the direct and indirect impacts of these regulations. This model deconstructs competitive dynamics into production competition and green innovation competition, and identifies key conditions under which regulations can achieve dual goals, highlighting a strong convergence effect and an appropriate regulatory intensity that slightly below the threshold. Through heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses, our findings suggest that targeting enterprises with high energy efficiency, industries with significant market concentration, enhancing innovation intention before regulation, and amplifying the market benefits of green innovation effectively promote green innovation. Our framework offers insights for optimizing energy-saving regulations to unlock synergy between reducing energy consumption and enhancing energy efficiency, as well as fostering green innovation among both regulated and unregulated enterprises.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325007479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unlocking synergy: The coevolution mechanism of enterprises' green innovation decisions under China's energy-saving regulations
Energy-saving regulations are commonly implemented in developing countries to reduce energy consumption and enhance efficiency. Yet, their effectiveness is often limited as regulated enterprises may prioritize output reductions over enhancements in energy efficiency due to the regulations' failure to incentivize green innovation. Prior research debates the direct impacts of such regulations on green innovation, with mixed findings, often overlooking the competitive dynamics between enterprises and indirect impacts on unregulated enterprises, which can bias results and harm overall energy conservation efforts. In this study, using China's two national energy-saving initiatives as prototypes, we introduce a two-player evolutionary game model to analyze both the direct and indirect impacts of these regulations. This model deconstructs competitive dynamics into production competition and green innovation competition, and identifies key conditions under which regulations can achieve dual goals, highlighting a strong convergence effect and an appropriate regulatory intensity that slightly below the threshold. Through heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses, our findings suggest that targeting enterprises with high energy efficiency, industries with significant market concentration, enhancing innovation intention before regulation, and amplifying the market benefits of green innovation effectively promote green innovation. Our framework offers insights for optimizing energy-saving regulations to unlock synergy between reducing energy consumption and enhancing energy efficiency, as well as fostering green innovation among both regulated and unregulated enterprises.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.