1991 - 2024年中国生态恢复研究综述：文献计量分析

IF 4.1 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Ecological Engineering Pub Date : 2025-09-29 DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107794

Qin Yue , Wang Shijin , Chen Shengyun , Cai Xingran

{"title":"1991 - 2024年中国生态恢复研究综述：文献计量分析","authors":"Qin Yue , Wang Shijin , Chen Shengyun , Cai Xingran","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ecological restoration has become a central issue in global sustainable development. Through large-scale engineering initiatives and policy innovation, China has gradually emerged as a key player in global environmental governance. This study draws on the Web of Science (WoS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, utilizing the keywords “ecological restoration”, “ecological rehabilitation”, “ecological remediation”, and other related terms. After screening the database and conducting a manual review, we identified 9,486 publications, mapping the development of research in this field over time and examining its major themes, geographic focus, and other key features. The results indicate that: (1) The research trajectory of ecological restoration in China exhibits a policy-driven pattern, with the growth in publication volume closely aligned with major policy milestones such as the Grain for Green Program and the Ecological Redline initiative. (2) Research hotspots in this field have gradually shifted from early soil and water conservation projects to the quantitative assessment of ecosystem services. The research has not only progressively innovated in technical approaches but has also continuously expanded in scope, spatial scale, and participation models. (3) Current hotspot research topics include carbon neutrality and carbon sink functions, climate change adaptation and vulnerable ecosystem management, multi-pollutant synergistic remediation and soil function reconstruction, aquatic ecosystem and blue carbon system restoration, and the optimization of ecosystem services and spatial pattern reconfiguration. In the future, efforts should focus on accelerating the development of an integrated “satellite-air-ground” intelligent monitoring network, promoting interdisciplinary integration in ecological restoration, and advancing theoretical and technological innovation, thereby contributing Chinese experience and optimized models to the global ecological restoration knowledge system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 107794"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of ecological restoration in China from 1991 to 2024: A bibliometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qin Yue , Wang Shijin , Chen Shengyun , Cai Xingran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ecological restoration has become a central issue in global sustainable development. Through large-scale engineering initiatives and policy innovation, China has gradually emerged as a key player in global environmental governance. This study draws on the Web of Science (WoS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, utilizing the keywords “ecological restoration”, “ecological rehabilitation”, “ecological remediation”, and other related terms. After screening the database and conducting a manual review, we identified 9,486 publications, mapping the development of research in this field over time and examining its major themes, geographic focus, and other key features. The results indicate that: (1) The research trajectory of ecological restoration in China exhibits a policy-driven pattern, with the growth in publication volume closely aligned with major policy milestones such as the Grain for Green Program and the Ecological Redline initiative. (2) Research hotspots in this field have gradually shifted from early soil and water conservation projects to the quantitative assessment of ecosystem services. The research has not only progressively innovated in technical approaches but has also continuously expanded in scope, spatial scale, and participation models. (3) Current hotspot research topics include carbon neutrality and carbon sink functions, climate change adaptation and vulnerable ecosystem management, multi-pollutant synergistic remediation and soil function reconstruction, aquatic ecosystem and blue carbon system restoration, and the optimization of ecosystem services and spatial pattern reconfiguration. In the future, efforts should focus on accelerating the development of an integrated “satellite-air-ground” intelligent monitoring network, promoting interdisciplinary integration in ecological restoration, and advancing theoretical and technological innovation, thereby contributing Chinese experience and optimized models to the global ecological restoration knowledge system.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002848\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425002848","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

生态恢复已成为全球可持续发展的核心问题。通过大规模的工程倡议和政策创新，中国逐渐成为全球环境治理的关键参与者。本研究基于Web of Science （WoS）和中国知网（CNKI）数据库，采用“生态修复”、“生态修复”、“生态修复”等相关关键词。在筛选数据库并进行人工审查后，我们确定了9486份出版物，绘制了该领域长期以来的研究发展情况，并检查了其主要主题、地理焦点和其他关键特征。结果表明：(1)中国生态恢复研究的发展轨迹呈现政策驱动的格局，论文发表量的增长与退耕还林工程、生态红线等重大政策里程碑密切相关；(2)该领域的研究热点逐渐从早期的水土保持工程转向生态系统服务的定量评价。研究不仅在技术手段上不断创新，而且在范围、空间尺度和参与模式上不断拓展。(3)当前研究热点包括碳中和与碳汇功能、气候变化适应与脆弱生态系统管理、多污染物协同修复与土壤功能重建、水生生态系统与蓝碳系统修复、生态系统服务优化与空间格局重构等。未来应着力加快“星-空-地”一体化智能监测网络建设，推进生态修复学科交叉融合，推进理论和技术创新，为全球生态修复知识体系贡献中国经验和优化模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

A systematic review of ecological restoration in China from 1991 to 2024: A bibliometric analysis

查看原文本刊更多论文

A systematic review of ecological restoration in China from 1991 to 2024: A bibliometric analysis

Ecological restoration has become a central issue in global sustainable development. Through large-scale engineering initiatives and policy innovation, China has gradually emerged as a key player in global environmental governance. This study draws on the Web of Science (WoS) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, utilizing the keywords “ecological restoration”, “ecological rehabilitation”, “ecological remediation”, and other related terms. After screening the database and conducting a manual review, we identified 9,486 publications, mapping the development of research in this field over time and examining its major themes, geographic focus, and other key features. The results indicate that: (1) The research trajectory of ecological restoration in China exhibits a policy-driven pattern, with the growth in publication volume closely aligned with major policy milestones such as the Grain for Green Program and the Ecological Redline initiative. (2) Research hotspots in this field have gradually shifted from early soil and water conservation projects to the quantitative assessment of ecosystem services. The research has not only progressively innovated in technical approaches but has also continuously expanded in scope, spatial scale, and participation models. (3) Current hotspot research topics include carbon neutrality and carbon sink functions, climate change adaptation and vulnerable ecosystem management, multi-pollutant synergistic remediation and soil function reconstruction, aquatic ecosystem and blue carbon system restoration, and the optimization of ecosystem services and spatial pattern reconfiguration. In the future, efforts should focus on accelerating the development of an integrated “satellite-air-ground” intelligent monitoring network, promoting interdisciplinary integration in ecological restoration, and advancing theoretical and technological innovation, thereby contributing Chinese experience and optimized models to the global ecological restoration knowledge system.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程：环境

CiteScore

8.00

自引率

5.30%

发文量

293

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.