Fabiano Colet , Spyridon Mourtzinis , Rachel A. Vann , Seth Naeve , Shawn P. Conley , Emma G. Matcham , Andre Borja Reis , Hans Kandel , David Moseley , Michael Plumblee , Eros Francisco , Giovani Preza Fontes , Daniela R. Carrijo , Trent Irby , Michael J. Mulvaney , Jonathan Kleinjan , Jeremy Ross , Chad D. Lee , Shaun Casteel , Mark A. Licht , Laura E. Lindsey
{"title":"商业生物刺激素种子处理对美国大豆种子产量的影响微乎其微","authors":"Fabiano Colet , Spyridon Mourtzinis , Rachel A. Vann , Seth Naeve , Shawn P. Conley , Emma G. Matcham , Andre Borja Reis , Hans Kandel , David Moseley , Michael Plumblee , Eros Francisco , Giovani Preza Fontes , Daniela R. Carrijo , Trent Irby , Michael J. Mulvaney , Jonathan Kleinjan , Jeremy Ross , Chad D. Lee , Shaun Casteel , Mark A. Licht , Laura E. Lindsey","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The use of biostimulant seed treatments (BST) in soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> (L.) Merr.) is a growing market, with many different products and active ingredients (microorganisms) available. Companies promote the use of biostimulant seed treatment products by claiming several potential benefits to crop production, including seed yield increase. There are limited field evaluations on the efficacy of biostimulant seed treatments to increase soybean seed yield in the USA, and many of the microorganisms included in biostimulant products that are marketed to soybean farmers have never been documented in the peer-reviewed literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Here, we evaluated the effect of several commercially available biostimulant seed treatment products on soybean seed yield.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Field trials were established using a standard protocol during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons across 22 states (103 site-years) in the USA. The 103 site-years were separated into four environmental clusters based on weather and soil properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant yield differences were observed due to biostimulant seed treatment across and within clusters in both years. We believe that the lack of yield response may have been due to factors such as competition of active ingredients with native soil microorganisms or lack of favorable conditions for plant-microbe interactions. Overall results suggest that management practices, such as row spacing, seeding rate, foliar insecticide, and tillage affect yield more than any of the examined biostimulant seed treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We argue that there is a need for further evaluations and standard requirements on the registration, production, commercialization, handling, and viability testing of biostimulants in the USA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 110170"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commercial biostimulant seed treatments showed minimal impact on soybean seed yield across the United States\",\"authors\":\"Fabiano Colet , Spyridon Mourtzinis , Rachel A. Vann , Seth Naeve , Shawn P. Conley , Emma G. Matcham , Andre Borja Reis , Hans Kandel , David Moseley , Michael Plumblee , Eros Francisco , Giovani Preza Fontes , Daniela R. Carrijo , Trent Irby , Michael J. Mulvaney , Jonathan Kleinjan , Jeremy Ross , Chad D. Lee , Shaun Casteel , Mark A. Licht , Laura E. Lindsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>The use of biostimulant seed treatments (BST) in soybean (<em>Glycine max</em> (L.) Merr.) is a growing market, with many different products and active ingredients (microorganisms) available. Companies promote the use of biostimulant seed treatment products by claiming several potential benefits to crop production, including seed yield increase. There are limited field evaluations on the efficacy of biostimulant seed treatments to increase soybean seed yield in the USA, and many of the microorganisms included in biostimulant products that are marketed to soybean farmers have never been documented in the peer-reviewed literature.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Here, we evaluated the effect of several commercially available biostimulant seed treatment products on soybean seed yield.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Field trials were established using a standard protocol during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons across 22 states (103 site-years) in the USA. The 103 site-years were separated into four environmental clusters based on weather and soil properties.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No significant yield differences were observed due to biostimulant seed treatment across and within clusters in both years. We believe that the lack of yield response may have been due to factors such as competition of active ingredients with native soil microorganisms or lack of favorable conditions for plant-microbe interactions. Overall results suggest that management practices, such as row spacing, seeding rate, foliar insecticide, and tillage affect yield more than any of the examined biostimulant seed treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We argue that there is a need for further evaluations and standard requirements on the registration, production, commercialization, handling, and viability testing of biostimulants in the USA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"334 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004356\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004356","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生物刺激素种子处理(BST)在大豆(Glycine max (L.))中的应用)是一个不断增长的市场,有许多不同的产品和活性成分(微生物)可用。公司宣传使用生物刺激素种子处理产品,声称对作物生产有几个潜在的好处,包括种子产量的增加。在美国,对生物刺激素种子处理提高大豆种子产量的有效性的实地评估有限,而且向大豆种植者销售的生物刺激素产品中包含的许多微生物从未在同行评议的文献中被记录。目的评价几种市售生物刺激素种子处理产品对大豆种子产量的影响。方法:采用标准方案,于2022年和2023年在美国22个州(103个站点年)的生长季节进行田间试验。103个站点年根据天气和土壤特性被分为四个环境集群。结果两年内,不同种子处理间和簇内的产量均无显著差异。我们认为,缺乏产量响应可能是由于有效成分与原生土壤微生物的竞争或缺乏植物与微生物相互作用的有利条件等因素造成的。总体结果表明,管理措施,如行距、播种率、叶面杀虫剂和耕作方式对产量的影响大于任何一种生物刺激素种子处理。结论在美国,生物刺激素的注册、生产、商业化、处理和活力测试等方面需要进一步的评价和标准要求。
Commercial biostimulant seed treatments showed minimal impact on soybean seed yield across the United States
Context
The use of biostimulant seed treatments (BST) in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is a growing market, with many different products and active ingredients (microorganisms) available. Companies promote the use of biostimulant seed treatment products by claiming several potential benefits to crop production, including seed yield increase. There are limited field evaluations on the efficacy of biostimulant seed treatments to increase soybean seed yield in the USA, and many of the microorganisms included in biostimulant products that are marketed to soybean farmers have never been documented in the peer-reviewed literature.
Objective
Here, we evaluated the effect of several commercially available biostimulant seed treatment products on soybean seed yield.
Methods
Field trials were established using a standard protocol during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons across 22 states (103 site-years) in the USA. The 103 site-years were separated into four environmental clusters based on weather and soil properties.
Results
No significant yield differences were observed due to biostimulant seed treatment across and within clusters in both years. We believe that the lack of yield response may have been due to factors such as competition of active ingredients with native soil microorganisms or lack of favorable conditions for plant-microbe interactions. Overall results suggest that management practices, such as row spacing, seeding rate, foliar insecticide, and tillage affect yield more than any of the examined biostimulant seed treatments.
Conclusion
We argue that there is a need for further evaluations and standard requirements on the registration, production, commercialization, handling, and viability testing of biostimulants in the USA.
期刊介绍:
Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on:
√ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels
on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems,
with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.