两种DSSAT-CSM模式对巴西品种BRS Formosa木薯的性能及其对气候变化的敏感性

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Paola de Figueiredo Bongiovani , Paulo Cesar Sentelhas , Diego Magalhães de Melo , Fábio Luís Seixas Costa , Eder Jorge de Oliveira , Patricia Moreno-Cadena , Gerrit Hoogenboom , Mauricio Antonio Coelho Filho
{"title":"两种DSSAT-CSM模式对巴西品种BRS Formosa木薯的性能及其对气候变化的敏感性","authors":"Paola de Figueiredo Bongiovani ,&nbsp;Paulo Cesar Sentelhas ,&nbsp;Diego Magalhães de Melo ,&nbsp;Fábio Luís Seixas Costa ,&nbsp;Eder Jorge de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Patricia Moreno-Cadena ,&nbsp;Gerrit Hoogenboom ,&nbsp;Mauricio Antonio Coelho Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><div>Cassava is well-adapted to diverse climates, but its response to future climate conditions remains uncertain. Crop growth models are crucial for predicting climate effects on yield and evaluating strategies to mitigate or adapt to these changes. However, these models require evaluation to simulate yield accurately.</div></div><div><h3>Objective or research question</h3><div>The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the of the CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava models in the DSSAT platform for simulating the yield of the drought- and bacterial blight-tolerant cassava variety BRS Formosa in Brazil’s northeast climate. The objectives were: i) to calibrate and assess model performance for estimating BRS Formosa yield, and ii) to analyze the models' sensitivity to changes in temperature, rainfall, and CO<sub>2</sub>, exploring their potential for climate impact studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Calibration was based on the irrigated treatments from Embrapa experiments conducted in Cruz das Almas (2017–2020) and Petrolina (2015/16), while for evaluation the data from rainfed treatments and additional experiments in Cruz das Almas (2012–2018), Guanambi (2013–2015), Laje (2012/13, 2015/16), and Petrolina (2013/14), were used. Calibration involved adjusting 23 genetic coefficients for CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and 13, for CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Model performance was evaluated using statistical indices, showing good accuracy for cassava storage root yield, with MAEs of 2195 and 2425 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> and d values of 0.92 and 0.83 for CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava, respectively. The ensemble of both models, applied to final storage root yield only, further improved performance (MAE = 1973 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>; d = 0.91). Both models also simulated phenology and canopy traits (leaf number, stem and aboveground biomass) with good accuracy, and were sensitive to air temperature, rainfall, and [CO₂].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The ensemble provided the most reliable estimates of final storage root yield with the current DSSAT versions, whereas the individual models remain valuable for simulating phenology and canopy traits.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>The model analyses from this study are essential for estimating future cassava yield in Northeast Brazil, assessing climate risks, and guiding adaptive strategies for sustainable production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 110168"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and sensitivity to climate change of two DSSAT-CSM cassava models for the Brazilian cultivar BRS Formosa\",\"authors\":\"Paola de Figueiredo Bongiovani ,&nbsp;Paulo Cesar Sentelhas ,&nbsp;Diego Magalhães de Melo ,&nbsp;Fábio Luís Seixas Costa ,&nbsp;Eder Jorge de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Patricia Moreno-Cadena ,&nbsp;Gerrit Hoogenboom ,&nbsp;Mauricio Antonio Coelho Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context or problem</h3><div>Cassava is well-adapted to diverse climates, but its response to future climate conditions remains uncertain. Crop growth models are crucial for predicting climate effects on yield and evaluating strategies to mitigate or adapt to these changes. However, these models require evaluation to simulate yield accurately.</div></div><div><h3>Objective or research question</h3><div>The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the of the CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava models in the DSSAT platform for simulating the yield of the drought- and bacterial blight-tolerant cassava variety BRS Formosa in Brazil’s northeast climate. The objectives were: i) to calibrate and assess model performance for estimating BRS Formosa yield, and ii) to analyze the models' sensitivity to changes in temperature, rainfall, and CO<sub>2</sub>, exploring their potential for climate impact studies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Calibration was based on the irrigated treatments from Embrapa experiments conducted in Cruz das Almas (2017–2020) and Petrolina (2015/16), while for evaluation the data from rainfed treatments and additional experiments in Cruz das Almas (2012–2018), Guanambi (2013–2015), Laje (2012/13, 2015/16), and Petrolina (2013/14), were used. Calibration involved adjusting 23 genetic coefficients for CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and 13, for CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Model performance was evaluated using statistical indices, showing good accuracy for cassava storage root yield, with MAEs of 2195 and 2425 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> and d values of 0.92 and 0.83 for CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava, respectively. The ensemble of both models, applied to final storage root yield only, further improved performance (MAE = 1973 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>; d = 0.91). Both models also simulated phenology and canopy traits (leaf number, stem and aboveground biomass) with good accuracy, and were sensitive to air temperature, rainfall, and [CO₂].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The ensemble provided the most reliable estimates of final storage root yield with the current DSSAT versions, whereas the individual models remain valuable for simulating phenology and canopy traits.</div></div><div><h3>Implications or significance</h3><div>The model analyses from this study are essential for estimating future cassava yield in Northeast Brazil, assessing climate risks, and guiding adaptive strategies for sustainable production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"334 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004332\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景或问题木薯很好地适应了各种气候,但它对未来气候条件的反应仍不确定。作物生长模型对于预测气候对产量的影响以及评估缓解或适应这些变化的策略至关重要。然而,这些模型需要评估,以准确地模拟产量。本研究的目的是在DSSAT平台上评估CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava和CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava模型在巴西东北气候条件下模拟耐干旱和细菌枯萎病木薯品种BRS Formosa产量的性能。本研究的目标是:1)校正和评估模型在估算BRS Formosa产量方面的性能;2)分析模型对温度、降雨和CO2变化的敏感性,探索其在气候影响研究中的潜力。方法基于在Cruz das Almas(2017-2020)和Petrolina(2015/16)进行的Embrapa灌溉试验的数据进行校准,而对Cruz das Almas(2012-2018)、Guanambi(2013-2015)、Laje(2012/13、2015/16)和Petrolina(2013/14)的雨养处理和补充试验数据进行评估。校准包括调整CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava的23个遗传系数和CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava的13个遗传系数。结果采用统计指标对模型性能进行评价,结果表明,模型对木薯贮藏根产量具有较好的预测精度,其MAEs分别为2195和2425 kg ha−1,模型的d值分别为0.92和0.83。两种模型的综合,仅应用于最终贮藏根产量,进一步提高了性能(MAE = 1973 kg ha−1;d = 0.91)。两种模型均能较好地模拟物候和冠层性状(叶数、茎数和地上生物量),且对气温、降雨和[CO₂]敏感。综上所述模型提供了当前DSSAT版本中最可靠的最终贮藏根产量估算,而单个模型在模拟物候和冠层性状方面仍有价值。本研究的模型分析对于估计巴西东北部未来木薯产量、评估气候风险和指导可持续生产的适应策略至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and sensitivity to climate change of two DSSAT-CSM cassava models for the Brazilian cultivar BRS Formosa

Context or problem

Cassava is well-adapted to diverse climates, but its response to future climate conditions remains uncertain. Crop growth models are crucial for predicting climate effects on yield and evaluating strategies to mitigate or adapt to these changes. However, these models require evaluation to simulate yield accurately.

Objective or research question

The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the of the CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava models in the DSSAT platform for simulating the yield of the drought- and bacterial blight-tolerant cassava variety BRS Formosa in Brazil’s northeast climate. The objectives were: i) to calibrate and assess model performance for estimating BRS Formosa yield, and ii) to analyze the models' sensitivity to changes in temperature, rainfall, and CO2, exploring their potential for climate impact studies.

Methods

Calibration was based on the irrigated treatments from Embrapa experiments conducted in Cruz das Almas (2017–2020) and Petrolina (2015/16), while for evaluation the data from rainfed treatments and additional experiments in Cruz das Almas (2012–2018), Guanambi (2013–2015), Laje (2012/13, 2015/16), and Petrolina (2013/14), were used. Calibration involved adjusting 23 genetic coefficients for CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and 13, for CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava.

Results

Model performance was evaluated using statistical indices, showing good accuracy for cassava storage root yield, with MAEs of 2195 and 2425 kg ha−1 and d values of 0.92 and 0.83 for CSM-CROPSIM-Cassava and CSM-MANIHOT-Cassava, respectively. The ensemble of both models, applied to final storage root yield only, further improved performance (MAE = 1973 kg ha−1; d = 0.91). Both models also simulated phenology and canopy traits (leaf number, stem and aboveground biomass) with good accuracy, and were sensitive to air temperature, rainfall, and [CO₂].

Conclusions

The ensemble provided the most reliable estimates of final storage root yield with the current DSSAT versions, whereas the individual models remain valuable for simulating phenology and canopy traits.

Implications or significance

The model analyses from this study are essential for estimating future cassava yield in Northeast Brazil, assessing climate risks, and guiding adaptive strategies for sustainable production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Field Crops Research
Field Crops Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
12.10%
发文量
307
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on: √ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems, with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信