Lovish Kasrija , Dafeng Hui , Avedananda Ray , Wei Ren , Lixin Wang , Philip A. Fay , Douglas R. Smith , Jianwei Li , Prabodh Illukpitiya , Hanqin Tian
{"title":"免耕和少耕对作物产量和温室气体排放影响的大型分析","authors":"Lovish Kasrija , Dafeng Hui , Avedananda Ray , Wei Ren , Lixin Wang , Philip A. Fay , Douglas R. Smith , Jianwei Li , Prabodh Illukpitiya , Hanqin Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agriculture contributes 11 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Conservation tillage practices such as no-tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) are promoted as climate-smart strategies to mitigate GHG emissions without compromising crop yields. However, existing meta-analyses have produced contradictory results regarding the effects of these practices on crop yields and soil GHG emissions. To address these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from 30 meta-analyses to comprehensively assess the impacts of the NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT on crop yields and GHG emissions. Our results showed that the tillage treatments (NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT) exhibited no significant overall effect on crop yields. NT did not influence soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and none of the tillage treatments influenced soil CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. However, NT increased soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 10.5 % (0.010, 95 % Confidence interval: 0.067, 0.132), whereas RT and NT+RT had no significant effect on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The varied impacts of tillage treatments were attributed to the interactions among experimental settings, soil properties, and agriculture practices such as crop residue management, irrigation type, and nitrogen fertilizer application rate. This mega-analysis provides a more comprehensive quantification than individual meta-analyses, offering valuable insights into the impacts of conservation tillage practices on crop yields and GHG emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12143,"journal":{"name":"Field Crops Research","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 110167"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mega-analysis of no-tillage and reduced tillage impacts on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions\",\"authors\":\"Lovish Kasrija , Dafeng Hui , Avedananda Ray , Wei Ren , Lixin Wang , Philip A. Fay , Douglas R. Smith , Jianwei Li , Prabodh Illukpitiya , Hanqin Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Agriculture contributes 11 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Conservation tillage practices such as no-tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) are promoted as climate-smart strategies to mitigate GHG emissions without compromising crop yields. However, existing meta-analyses have produced contradictory results regarding the effects of these practices on crop yields and soil GHG emissions. To address these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from 30 meta-analyses to comprehensively assess the impacts of the NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT on crop yields and GHG emissions. Our results showed that the tillage treatments (NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT) exhibited no significant overall effect on crop yields. NT did not influence soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and none of the tillage treatments influenced soil CH<sub>4</sub> emissions. However, NT increased soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 10.5 % (0.010, 95 % Confidence interval: 0.067, 0.132), whereas RT and NT+RT had no significant effect on soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The varied impacts of tillage treatments were attributed to the interactions among experimental settings, soil properties, and agriculture practices such as crop residue management, irrigation type, and nitrogen fertilizer application rate. This mega-analysis provides a more comprehensive quantification than individual meta-analyses, offering valuable insights into the impacts of conservation tillage practices on crop yields and GHG emissions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"volume\":\"334 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Field Crops Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004320\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Crops Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429025004320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mega-analysis of no-tillage and reduced tillage impacts on crop yields and greenhouse gas emissions
Agriculture contributes 11 % of total anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). Conservation tillage practices such as no-tillage (NT) and reduced tillage (RT) are promoted as climate-smart strategies to mitigate GHG emissions without compromising crop yields. However, existing meta-analyses have produced contradictory results regarding the effects of these practices on crop yields and soil GHG emissions. To address these discrepancies, we conducted a mega-analysis, synthesizing data from 30 meta-analyses to comprehensively assess the impacts of the NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT on crop yields and GHG emissions. Our results showed that the tillage treatments (NT, RT, and mixed NT+RT) exhibited no significant overall effect on crop yields. NT did not influence soil CO2 emissions, and none of the tillage treatments influenced soil CH4 emissions. However, NT increased soil N2O emissions by 10.5 % (0.010, 95 % Confidence interval: 0.067, 0.132), whereas RT and NT+RT had no significant effect on soil N2O emissions. The varied impacts of tillage treatments were attributed to the interactions among experimental settings, soil properties, and agriculture practices such as crop residue management, irrigation type, and nitrogen fertilizer application rate. This mega-analysis provides a more comprehensive quantification than individual meta-analyses, offering valuable insights into the impacts of conservation tillage practices on crop yields and GHG emissions.
期刊介绍:
Field Crops Research is an international journal publishing scientific articles on:
√ experimental and modelling research at field, farm and landscape levels
on temperate and tropical crops and cropping systems,
with a focus on crop ecology and physiology, agronomy, and plant genetics and breeding.