面向可持续发展目标的城市低碳转型能力评估的深度学习与多标准决策相结合的集成框架

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Wentao Wang , Dezhi Li , Keyan Liu , Yongheng Zhao , Huan Zhou , Shenghua Zhou
{"title":"面向可持续发展目标的城市低碳转型能力评估的深度学习与多标准决策相结合的集成框架","authors":"Wentao Wang ,&nbsp;Dezhi Li ,&nbsp;Keyan Liu ,&nbsp;Yongheng Zhao ,&nbsp;Huan Zhou ,&nbsp;Shenghua Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a critical role in guiding the assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Transition Capacity (ULCTC). However, existing research on ULCTC assessment often overlooks the synergies with the SDGs, as well as spatial-temporal effects and causal relationships among multiple factors within the assessment process. To address these gaps, this study develops an SDG-oriented ULCTC assessment framework and proposes an integrated assessment method that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to explicitly incorporate complex attributes into the assessment. Using prefecture-level cities in China as a case study, the results reveal that: (1) the proposed DL model, integrating GCN and LSTM, achieves superior performance in capturing spatial-temporal effects compared to other models; (2) the MCDM approach distinguishes between “cause” and “effect” indicators, and prevents biased assessment outcomes where strong performance in one dimension conceals weaknesses in others, or vice versa; and (3) spatially, ULCTC exhibits strong clustering in regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta, while temporally, ULCTC shows a steady upward trend, with provincial capitals experiencing the most significant improvements. This study establishes a theoretical bridge between ULCTC and the SDGs, redefines the role of DL in ULCTC assessment, and develops an approach that captures spatio-temporal attributes and causal relationships while balancing synergies and trade-offs, which not only enhances methodological robustness but also generates actionable insights for differentiated policy design, ensuring that low-carbon transition pathways avoid the risks of misjudging short- and long-term priorities or undermining SDG coherence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108194"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated framework combining deep learning and multicriteria decision-making for SDG-oriented urban low-carbon transition capacity assessment\",\"authors\":\"Wentao Wang ,&nbsp;Dezhi Li ,&nbsp;Keyan Liu ,&nbsp;Yongheng Zhao ,&nbsp;Huan Zhou ,&nbsp;Shenghua Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a critical role in guiding the assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Transition Capacity (ULCTC). However, existing research on ULCTC assessment often overlooks the synergies with the SDGs, as well as spatial-temporal effects and causal relationships among multiple factors within the assessment process. To address these gaps, this study develops an SDG-oriented ULCTC assessment framework and proposes an integrated assessment method that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to explicitly incorporate complex attributes into the assessment. Using prefecture-level cities in China as a case study, the results reveal that: (1) the proposed DL model, integrating GCN and LSTM, achieves superior performance in capturing spatial-temporal effects compared to other models; (2) the MCDM approach distinguishes between “cause” and “effect” indicators, and prevents biased assessment outcomes where strong performance in one dimension conceals weaknesses in others, or vice versa; and (3) spatially, ULCTC exhibits strong clustering in regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta, while temporally, ULCTC shows a steady upward trend, with provincial capitals experiencing the most significant improvements. This study establishes a theoretical bridge between ULCTC and the SDGs, redefines the role of DL in ULCTC assessment, and develops an approach that captures spatio-temporal attributes and causal relationships while balancing synergies and trade-offs, which not only enhances methodological robustness but also generates actionable insights for differentiated policy design, ensuring that low-carbon transition pathways avoid the risks of misjudging short- and long-term priorities or undermining SDG coherence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003919\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003919","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续发展目标(sdg)在指导城市低碳转型能力评估方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,现有的ULCTC评估研究往往忽略了与可持续发展目标的协同作用,以及评估过程中多个因素之间的时空效应和因果关系。为了解决这些差距,本研究开发了一个面向可持续发展目标的ULCTC评估框架,并提出了一种结合深度学习(DL)和多标准决策(MCDM)的综合评估方法,以明确地将复杂属性纳入评估。以中国地级市为例,结果表明:(1)综合GCN和LSTM的深度学习模型在捕捉时空效应方面优于其他模型;(2) MCDM方法区分了“原因”和“结果”指标,防止了评估结果的偏差,即在一个维度上的优秀表现掩盖了其他维度的弱点,反之亦然;③从空间上看,京津冀、长三角、珠三角等区域的城市综合承载力呈较强集聚性,从时间上看,城市综合承载力呈稳定上升趋势,其中以省会城市改善最为显著。本研究在ULCTC和可持续发展目标之间建立了一座理论桥梁,重新定义了DL在ULCTC评估中的作用,并开发了一种捕捉时空属性和因果关系的方法,同时平衡了协同效应和权衡,这不仅增强了方法的鲁棒性,而且为差异化政策设计提供了可操作的见解。确保低碳转型路径避免误判短期和长期优先事项或破坏可持续发展目标一致性的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrated framework combining deep learning and multicriteria decision-making for SDG-oriented urban low-carbon transition capacity assessment
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a critical role in guiding the assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Transition Capacity (ULCTC). However, existing research on ULCTC assessment often overlooks the synergies with the SDGs, as well as spatial-temporal effects and causal relationships among multiple factors within the assessment process. To address these gaps, this study develops an SDG-oriented ULCTC assessment framework and proposes an integrated assessment method that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to explicitly incorporate complex attributes into the assessment. Using prefecture-level cities in China as a case study, the results reveal that: (1) the proposed DL model, integrating GCN and LSTM, achieves superior performance in capturing spatial-temporal effects compared to other models; (2) the MCDM approach distinguishes between “cause” and “effect” indicators, and prevents biased assessment outcomes where strong performance in one dimension conceals weaknesses in others, or vice versa; and (3) spatially, ULCTC exhibits strong clustering in regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta, while temporally, ULCTC shows a steady upward trend, with provincial capitals experiencing the most significant improvements. This study establishes a theoretical bridge between ULCTC and the SDGs, redefines the role of DL in ULCTC assessment, and develops an approach that captures spatio-temporal attributes and causal relationships while balancing synergies and trade-offs, which not only enhances methodological robustness but also generates actionable insights for differentiated policy design, ensuring that low-carbon transition pathways avoid the risks of misjudging short- and long-term priorities or undermining SDG coherence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信