Wentao Wang , Dezhi Li , Keyan Liu , Yongheng Zhao , Huan Zhou , Shenghua Zhou
{"title":"面向可持续发展目标的城市低碳转型能力评估的深度学习与多标准决策相结合的集成框架","authors":"Wentao Wang , Dezhi Li , Keyan Liu , Yongheng Zhao , Huan Zhou , Shenghua Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a critical role in guiding the assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Transition Capacity (ULCTC). However, existing research on ULCTC assessment often overlooks the synergies with the SDGs, as well as spatial-temporal effects and causal relationships among multiple factors within the assessment process. To address these gaps, this study develops an SDG-oriented ULCTC assessment framework and proposes an integrated assessment method that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to explicitly incorporate complex attributes into the assessment. Using prefecture-level cities in China as a case study, the results reveal that: (1) the proposed DL model, integrating GCN and LSTM, achieves superior performance in capturing spatial-temporal effects compared to other models; (2) the MCDM approach distinguishes between “cause” and “effect” indicators, and prevents biased assessment outcomes where strong performance in one dimension conceals weaknesses in others, or vice versa; and (3) spatially, ULCTC exhibits strong clustering in regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta, while temporally, ULCTC shows a steady upward trend, with provincial capitals experiencing the most significant improvements. This study establishes a theoretical bridge between ULCTC and the SDGs, redefines the role of DL in ULCTC assessment, and develops an approach that captures spatio-temporal attributes and causal relationships while balancing synergies and trade-offs, which not only enhances methodological robustness but also generates actionable insights for differentiated policy design, ensuring that low-carbon transition pathways avoid the risks of misjudging short- and long-term priorities or undermining SDG coherence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108194"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated framework combining deep learning and multicriteria decision-making for SDG-oriented urban low-carbon transition capacity assessment\",\"authors\":\"Wentao Wang , Dezhi Li , Keyan Liu , Yongheng Zhao , Huan Zhou , Shenghua Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a critical role in guiding the assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Transition Capacity (ULCTC). However, existing research on ULCTC assessment often overlooks the synergies with the SDGs, as well as spatial-temporal effects and causal relationships among multiple factors within the assessment process. To address these gaps, this study develops an SDG-oriented ULCTC assessment framework and proposes an integrated assessment method that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to explicitly incorporate complex attributes into the assessment. Using prefecture-level cities in China as a case study, the results reveal that: (1) the proposed DL model, integrating GCN and LSTM, achieves superior performance in capturing spatial-temporal effects compared to other models; (2) the MCDM approach distinguishes between “cause” and “effect” indicators, and prevents biased assessment outcomes where strong performance in one dimension conceals weaknesses in others, or vice versa; and (3) spatially, ULCTC exhibits strong clustering in regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta, while temporally, ULCTC shows a steady upward trend, with provincial capitals experiencing the most significant improvements. This study establishes a theoretical bridge between ULCTC and the SDGs, redefines the role of DL in ULCTC assessment, and develops an approach that captures spatio-temporal attributes and causal relationships while balancing synergies and trade-offs, which not only enhances methodological robustness but also generates actionable insights for differentiated policy design, ensuring that low-carbon transition pathways avoid the risks of misjudging short- and long-term priorities or undermining SDG coherence.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003919\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003919","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrated framework combining deep learning and multicriteria decision-making for SDG-oriented urban low-carbon transition capacity assessment
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) play a critical role in guiding the assessment of Urban Low-Carbon Transition Capacity (ULCTC). However, existing research on ULCTC assessment often overlooks the synergies with the SDGs, as well as spatial-temporal effects and causal relationships among multiple factors within the assessment process. To address these gaps, this study develops an SDG-oriented ULCTC assessment framework and proposes an integrated assessment method that combines deep learning (DL) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) to explicitly incorporate complex attributes into the assessment. Using prefecture-level cities in China as a case study, the results reveal that: (1) the proposed DL model, integrating GCN and LSTM, achieves superior performance in capturing spatial-temporal effects compared to other models; (2) the MCDM approach distinguishes between “cause” and “effect” indicators, and prevents biased assessment outcomes where strong performance in one dimension conceals weaknesses in others, or vice versa; and (3) spatially, ULCTC exhibits strong clustering in regions such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Pearl River Delta, while temporally, ULCTC shows a steady upward trend, with provincial capitals experiencing the most significant improvements. This study establishes a theoretical bridge between ULCTC and the SDGs, redefines the role of DL in ULCTC assessment, and develops an approach that captures spatio-temporal attributes and causal relationships while balancing synergies and trade-offs, which not only enhances methodological robustness but also generates actionable insights for differentiated policy design, ensuring that low-carbon transition pathways avoid the risks of misjudging short- and long-term priorities or undermining SDG coherence.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.