Paul de Joannis , Christophe Castel , Mohamed Kanniche , Eric Favre , Olivier Authier
{"title":"填料床与结构吸附剂直接捕集空气的技术经济分析","authors":"Paul de Joannis , Christophe Castel , Mohamed Kanniche , Eric Favre , Olivier Authier","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates a direct air capture (DAC) process using a solid-DAC S-VTSA (steam-assisted vacuum thermal swing adsorption) process. A commercially available sorbent, commonly used in packed bed configurations, is selected as the benchmark sorbent, while a monolithic geometry is also examined to assess its potential performance. The process is modelled using Aspen Adsorption and incorporates physico-chemical data in DAC environmental conditions, including binary isotherms under humid condition. In a reference case comparing the two geometries, the packed bed exhibits higher productivity (2.4 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/(h.m<sup>3</sup>)), while the monolith achieves 1.2 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/(h.m<sup>3</sup>). However, the monolith allows for a significant reduction in pressure drop and associated fan work by about two orders of magnitude. These findings highlight the trade-off between productivity in favor of packed bed and energy requirement in favor of monolithic design. A sensitivity analysis is then conducted on various environmental and process parameters such as sorbent and bed dimension, air velocity, temperature and humidity, adsorption/desorption loading, mass transfer kinetic, and regeneration pressure, temperature, and steam flowrate. Detailed techno-economic analysis, using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer software for capital cost estimation, is performed at capture scale of 100 ktCO<sub>2</sub>/yr, with capture costs higher than 1500 €/tCO<sub>2</sub>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Techno-economic analysis of packed bed and structured adsorbent for direct air capture\",\"authors\":\"Paul de Joannis , Christophe Castel , Mohamed Kanniche , Eric Favre , Olivier Authier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates a direct air capture (DAC) process using a solid-DAC S-VTSA (steam-assisted vacuum thermal swing adsorption) process. A commercially available sorbent, commonly used in packed bed configurations, is selected as the benchmark sorbent, while a monolithic geometry is also examined to assess its potential performance. The process is modelled using Aspen Adsorption and incorporates physico-chemical data in DAC environmental conditions, including binary isotherms under humid condition. In a reference case comparing the two geometries, the packed bed exhibits higher productivity (2.4 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/(h.m<sup>3</sup>)), while the monolith achieves 1.2 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/(h.m<sup>3</sup>). However, the monolith allows for a significant reduction in pressure drop and associated fan work by about two orders of magnitude. These findings highlight the trade-off between productivity in favor of packed bed and energy requirement in favor of monolithic design. A sensitivity analysis is then conducted on various environmental and process parameters such as sorbent and bed dimension, air velocity, temperature and humidity, adsorption/desorption loading, mass transfer kinetic, and regeneration pressure, temperature, and steam flowrate. Detailed techno-economic analysis, using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer software for capital cost estimation, is performed at capture scale of 100 ktCO<sub>2</sub>/yr, with capture costs higher than 1500 €/tCO<sub>2</sub>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon Capture Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon Capture Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656825001551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772656825001551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Techno-economic analysis of packed bed and structured adsorbent for direct air capture
This study investigates a direct air capture (DAC) process using a solid-DAC S-VTSA (steam-assisted vacuum thermal swing adsorption) process. A commercially available sorbent, commonly used in packed bed configurations, is selected as the benchmark sorbent, while a monolithic geometry is also examined to assess its potential performance. The process is modelled using Aspen Adsorption and incorporates physico-chemical data in DAC environmental conditions, including binary isotherms under humid condition. In a reference case comparing the two geometries, the packed bed exhibits higher productivity (2.4 kgCO2/(h.m3)), while the monolith achieves 1.2 kgCO2/(h.m3). However, the monolith allows for a significant reduction in pressure drop and associated fan work by about two orders of magnitude. These findings highlight the trade-off between productivity in favor of packed bed and energy requirement in favor of monolithic design. A sensitivity analysis is then conducted on various environmental and process parameters such as sorbent and bed dimension, air velocity, temperature and humidity, adsorption/desorption loading, mass transfer kinetic, and regeneration pressure, temperature, and steam flowrate. Detailed techno-economic analysis, using Aspen Process Economic Analyzer software for capital cost estimation, is performed at capture scale of 100 ktCO2/yr, with capture costs higher than 1500 €/tCO2.