W.X. Sun , Y.T. Li , W.J. Huang , Y.M. Zhang , M. Fan , Z.M. Xiao , W.G. Li
{"title":"IV型储氢容器失效评估的研究进展","authors":"W.X. Sun , Y.T. Li , W.J. Huang , Y.M. Zhang , M. Fan , Z.M. Xiao , W.G. Li","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing demand for hydrogen energy underscores the need for reliable storage systems, with Type IV hydrogen storage vessels emerging as a leading technology due to their lightweight, exceptional durability, and high energy storage density. This review critically examines recent advances in the failure assessment of Type IV vessels, focusing on material behaviors, design considerations, failure modes, and reliability evaluation methods. First, the discussion begins with an overview of hydrogen storage systems, emphasizing the evolution of Type IV vessels and key design factors influencing their failure resistance, including material selection criteria and compliance with regulatory standards. Next, a detailed analysis of failure mechanisms in polymer liners and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites is presented, covering hydrogen permeation effects, mechanical degradation, and temperature-induced damage. The review highlights experimental and numerical techniques for characterizing and modelling these failure behaviors. Furthermore, various reliability assessment approaches-deterministic, uncertainty-based, and surrogate modeling-are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting the lifespan of composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Despite significant progress, key challenges persist, including the accurate prediction of long-term performance under cyclic loading and extreme conditions. By consolidating key findings and identifying research gaps, this review proposes future directions to improve the safety and durability of Type IV hydrogen storage vessels, facilitating their broader adoption in sustainable energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116353"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in failure assessment of Type IV hydrogen storage vessels: A critical review\",\"authors\":\"W.X. Sun , Y.T. Li , W.J. Huang , Y.M. Zhang , M. Fan , Z.M. Xiao , W.G. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing demand for hydrogen energy underscores the need for reliable storage systems, with Type IV hydrogen storage vessels emerging as a leading technology due to their lightweight, exceptional durability, and high energy storage density. This review critically examines recent advances in the failure assessment of Type IV vessels, focusing on material behaviors, design considerations, failure modes, and reliability evaluation methods. First, the discussion begins with an overview of hydrogen storage systems, emphasizing the evolution of Type IV vessels and key design factors influencing their failure resistance, including material selection criteria and compliance with regulatory standards. Next, a detailed analysis of failure mechanisms in polymer liners and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites is presented, covering hydrogen permeation effects, mechanical degradation, and temperature-induced damage. The review highlights experimental and numerical techniques for characterizing and modelling these failure behaviors. Furthermore, various reliability assessment approaches-deterministic, uncertainty-based, and surrogate modeling-are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting the lifespan of composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Despite significant progress, key challenges persist, including the accurate prediction of long-term performance under cyclic loading and extreme conditions. By consolidating key findings and identifying research gaps, this review proposes future directions to improve the safety and durability of Type IV hydrogen storage vessels, facilitating their broader adoption in sustainable energy systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010263\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advances in failure assessment of Type IV hydrogen storage vessels: A critical review
The growing demand for hydrogen energy underscores the need for reliable storage systems, with Type IV hydrogen storage vessels emerging as a leading technology due to their lightweight, exceptional durability, and high energy storage density. This review critically examines recent advances in the failure assessment of Type IV vessels, focusing on material behaviors, design considerations, failure modes, and reliability evaluation methods. First, the discussion begins with an overview of hydrogen storage systems, emphasizing the evolution of Type IV vessels and key design factors influencing their failure resistance, including material selection criteria and compliance with regulatory standards. Next, a detailed analysis of failure mechanisms in polymer liners and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites is presented, covering hydrogen permeation effects, mechanical degradation, and temperature-induced damage. The review highlights experimental and numerical techniques for characterizing and modelling these failure behaviors. Furthermore, various reliability assessment approaches-deterministic, uncertainty-based, and surrogate modeling-are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting the lifespan of composite overwrapped pressure vessels. Despite significant progress, key challenges persist, including the accurate prediction of long-term performance under cyclic loading and extreme conditions. By consolidating key findings and identifying research gaps, this review proposes future directions to improve the safety and durability of Type IV hydrogen storage vessels, facilitating their broader adoption in sustainable energy systems.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.