Huanbin Yang , Yongliang Zhang , Ping Luo , Peng Guo , Haochun Xu , Chen Wang , Yikuan He
{"title":"后弯管道浮标物理模型试验综述","authors":"Huanbin Yang , Yongliang Zhang , Ping Luo , Peng Guo , Haochun Xu , Chen Wang , Yikuan He","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Backward Bent Duct Buoy (BBDB) is a special type of oscillating water column wave energy converter. Since its proposal in 1986, BBDB's potential for improving efficiency and practicality has attracted increasing research efforts. Studies have explored the BBDB from different perspectives and proposed diverse design modifications. However, so far, few reviews have focused on physical model tests of BBDB and its variants. The lack of structured summaries and statistical analysis could leave research themes unorganized and conclusions fragmented. Therefore, this review systematically summarizes and categorizes the major monitored indicators (dependent variables) and investigated characteristics (independent variables) in previous studies involving BBDB physical model tests. Key patterns and design insights are identified through statistical examination of data from 102 publications, including an optimal wavelength-to-device-length ratio around 2.2, an average efficiency reduction of 32 % under irregular waves, an optimal nozzle ratio clustering near 1.0 % and energy capture behavior that differs from traditional OWCs as wave tank breadth varies. Furthermore, available information on BBDB sea trial instances is compiled to bridge model-scale results with full-scale performance. This work provides the research community with a consolidated foundation for future research and design optimization, highlighting both a comprehensive compilation of previous studies and underexplored areas requiring future investigation, such as the decoupled and coupled effects of motions, performance discrepancy between turbines and orifices, assessments of variable sensitivity and array interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116346"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical model tests of Backward Bent Duct Buoy: A review\",\"authors\":\"Huanbin Yang , Yongliang Zhang , Ping Luo , Peng Guo , Haochun Xu , Chen Wang , Yikuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Backward Bent Duct Buoy (BBDB) is a special type of oscillating water column wave energy converter. Since its proposal in 1986, BBDB's potential for improving efficiency and practicality has attracted increasing research efforts. Studies have explored the BBDB from different perspectives and proposed diverse design modifications. However, so far, few reviews have focused on physical model tests of BBDB and its variants. The lack of structured summaries and statistical analysis could leave research themes unorganized and conclusions fragmented. Therefore, this review systematically summarizes and categorizes the major monitored indicators (dependent variables) and investigated characteristics (independent variables) in previous studies involving BBDB physical model tests. Key patterns and design insights are identified through statistical examination of data from 102 publications, including an optimal wavelength-to-device-length ratio around 2.2, an average efficiency reduction of 32 % under irregular waves, an optimal nozzle ratio clustering near 1.0 % and energy capture behavior that differs from traditional OWCs as wave tank breadth varies. Furthermore, available information on BBDB sea trial instances is compiled to bridge model-scale results with full-scale performance. This work provides the research community with a consolidated foundation for future research and design optimization, highlighting both a comprehensive compilation of previous studies and underexplored areas requiring future investigation, such as the decoupled and coupled effects of motions, performance discrepancy between turbines and orifices, assessments of variable sensitivity and array interactions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010196\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125010196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical model tests of Backward Bent Duct Buoy: A review
Backward Bent Duct Buoy (BBDB) is a special type of oscillating water column wave energy converter. Since its proposal in 1986, BBDB's potential for improving efficiency and practicality has attracted increasing research efforts. Studies have explored the BBDB from different perspectives and proposed diverse design modifications. However, so far, few reviews have focused on physical model tests of BBDB and its variants. The lack of structured summaries and statistical analysis could leave research themes unorganized and conclusions fragmented. Therefore, this review systematically summarizes and categorizes the major monitored indicators (dependent variables) and investigated characteristics (independent variables) in previous studies involving BBDB physical model tests. Key patterns and design insights are identified through statistical examination of data from 102 publications, including an optimal wavelength-to-device-length ratio around 2.2, an average efficiency reduction of 32 % under irregular waves, an optimal nozzle ratio clustering near 1.0 % and energy capture behavior that differs from traditional OWCs as wave tank breadth varies. Furthermore, available information on BBDB sea trial instances is compiled to bridge model-scale results with full-scale performance. This work provides the research community with a consolidated foundation for future research and design optimization, highlighting both a comprehensive compilation of previous studies and underexplored areas requiring future investigation, such as the decoupled and coupled effects of motions, performance discrepancy between turbines and orifices, assessments of variable sensitivity and array interactions.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.