氢供应链:建模挑战和可持续性差距

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
V.E.S.F. Oliveira , B.B.T. do Carmo , F.F. da Costa Fontes
{"title":"氢供应链:建模挑战和可持续性差距","authors":"V.E.S.F. Oliveira ,&nbsp;B.B.T. do Carmo ,&nbsp;F.F. da Costa Fontes","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid global efforts to decarbonize energy systems, hydrogen has emerged as a key solution for the transition to clean energy. However, the design of hydrogen supply chains (HSCs) remains a complex challenge, particularly in integrating sustainability pillars into strategic planning. Although several studies have proposed mathematical models for HSCs, few have critically examined how these models address together environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This study fills that gap by conducting a systematic literature review focusing on optimization approaches applied to HSC design, with a special emphasis on sustainability integration. Using the PRISMA methodology, a curated selection of 42 interconnected articles was analyzed in three stages: characterization of the literature, classification of modeling approaches, and systematization of future research perspectives. As its main contributions, this review reveals that most models emphasize economic and environmental objectives, whereas social aspects and life cycle considerations remain underexplored; highlights the limited incorporation of uncertainty modeling and policy instruments in existing frameworks; identifies key methodological advances; maps emerging research trends; and offers a structured agenda for future studies, emphasizing the need for more holistic, resilient, and inclusive approaches in HSC design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"401 ","pages":"Article 126827"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrogen supply chains: modeling challenges and sustainability gaps\",\"authors\":\"V.E.S.F. Oliveira ,&nbsp;B.B.T. do Carmo ,&nbsp;F.F. da Costa Fontes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Amid global efforts to decarbonize energy systems, hydrogen has emerged as a key solution for the transition to clean energy. However, the design of hydrogen supply chains (HSCs) remains a complex challenge, particularly in integrating sustainability pillars into strategic planning. Although several studies have proposed mathematical models for HSCs, few have critically examined how these models address together environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This study fills that gap by conducting a systematic literature review focusing on optimization approaches applied to HSC design, with a special emphasis on sustainability integration. Using the PRISMA methodology, a curated selection of 42 interconnected articles was analyzed in three stages: characterization of the literature, classification of modeling approaches, and systematization of future research perspectives. As its main contributions, this review reveals that most models emphasize economic and environmental objectives, whereas social aspects and life cycle considerations remain underexplored; highlights the limited incorporation of uncertainty modeling and policy instruments in existing frameworks; identifies key methodological advances; maps emerging research trends; and offers a structured agenda for future studies, emphasizing the need for more holistic, resilient, and inclusive approaches in HSC design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Energy\",\"volume\":\"401 \",\"pages\":\"Article 126827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925015570\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925015570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球努力使能源系统脱碳的背景下,氢已成为向清洁能源过渡的关键解决方案。然而,氢供应链(hsc)的设计仍然是一项复杂的挑战,特别是在将可持续性支柱纳入战略规划方面。尽管一些研究提出了hsc的数学模型,但很少有人批判性地考察这些模型如何同时处理环境、经济和社会方面的问题。本研究通过对应用于HSC设计的优化方法进行系统的文献综述,特别强调可持续性整合,填补了这一空白。使用PRISMA方法,对42篇相互关联的文章进行了精心挑选,分三个阶段进行了分析:文献表征、建模方法分类和未来研究前景的系统化。作为其主要贡献,本综述表明,大多数模型强调经济和环境目标,而社会方面和生命周期的考虑仍未得到充分探讨;强调在现有框架中有限地纳入不确定性建模和政策工具;确定关键的方法进展;绘制新兴研究趋势图;并为未来的研究提供了一个结构化的议程,强调在HSC设计中需要更全面、更有弹性和更包容的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hydrogen supply chains: modeling challenges and sustainability gaps
Amid global efforts to decarbonize energy systems, hydrogen has emerged as a key solution for the transition to clean energy. However, the design of hydrogen supply chains (HSCs) remains a complex challenge, particularly in integrating sustainability pillars into strategic planning. Although several studies have proposed mathematical models for HSCs, few have critically examined how these models address together environmental, economic, and social dimensions. This study fills that gap by conducting a systematic literature review focusing on optimization approaches applied to HSC design, with a special emphasis on sustainability integration. Using the PRISMA methodology, a curated selection of 42 interconnected articles was analyzed in three stages: characterization of the literature, classification of modeling approaches, and systematization of future research perspectives. As its main contributions, this review reveals that most models emphasize economic and environmental objectives, whereas social aspects and life cycle considerations remain underexplored; highlights the limited incorporation of uncertainty modeling and policy instruments in existing frameworks; identifies key methodological advances; maps emerging research trends; and offers a structured agenda for future studies, emphasizing the need for more holistic, resilient, and inclusive approaches in HSC design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信