Anthony E. Hughes , Christopher D. Easton , Prasaanth Ravi Anusuyadevi , Thomas J. Raeber , Nick C. Wilson , Arjan Mol
{"title":"腐蚀研究中x射线光电子能谱检查中fe2p峰的普遍错误分析","authors":"Anthony E. Hughes , Christopher D. Easton , Prasaanth Ravi Anusuyadevi , Thomas J. Raeber , Nick C. Wilson , Arjan Mol","doi":"10.1016/j.corsci.2025.113357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>XPS analysis is routinely used in corrosion studies to analyse corrosion product and protective layers on a range of metals. In the case of transition metals and especially iron, the extraction of information about chemical species including identification and quantification requires complex fitting of the metal 2p spectrum. Unfortunately, there is extensive misunderstanding of what is required for fitting of these metal 2p photoelectron peaks. In the case of high spin Fe 2p compounds there is a complex structure based on multiplet and satellite peaks which is often ignored. In this review of the application of XPS in the study of corrosion and protection of ferrous metals; we quantify the extent of misinterpretation of XPS Fe 2p spectra within the literature. It is found that in over 70 % of papers there is an adamant misunderstanding of the requirements for fitting Fe 2p, which can be divided into three groups. First, in the most serious case, there seems to be a lack of understanding of spin orbit coupling which gives rise to the major Fe 2p<sub>3/2</sub> and Fe 2p<sub>1/2</sub> peaks with the latter being incorrectly assigned to a different chemical species. Second, satellite structures are often assigned to a different chemical species. Third, single peaks are used to fit chemical components whereas a complex multiplet structure should be employed. We establish the extent to which these errors are made by critical appraisal of over 220 papers published in selected years between 2015 and 2024.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":290,"journal":{"name":"Corrosion Science","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 113357"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Widespread erroneous analysis of the Fe 2p peak in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy examination in corrosion studies\",\"authors\":\"Anthony E. Hughes , Christopher D. Easton , Prasaanth Ravi Anusuyadevi , Thomas J. Raeber , Nick C. Wilson , Arjan Mol\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.corsci.2025.113357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>XPS analysis is routinely used in corrosion studies to analyse corrosion product and protective layers on a range of metals. In the case of transition metals and especially iron, the extraction of information about chemical species including identification and quantification requires complex fitting of the metal 2p spectrum. Unfortunately, there is extensive misunderstanding of what is required for fitting of these metal 2p photoelectron peaks. In the case of high spin Fe 2p compounds there is a complex structure based on multiplet and satellite peaks which is often ignored. In this review of the application of XPS in the study of corrosion and protection of ferrous metals; we quantify the extent of misinterpretation of XPS Fe 2p spectra within the literature. It is found that in over 70 % of papers there is an adamant misunderstanding of the requirements for fitting Fe 2p, which can be divided into three groups. First, in the most serious case, there seems to be a lack of understanding of spin orbit coupling which gives rise to the major Fe 2p<sub>3/2</sub> and Fe 2p<sub>1/2</sub> peaks with the latter being incorrectly assigned to a different chemical species. Second, satellite structures are often assigned to a different chemical species. Third, single peaks are used to fit chemical components whereas a complex multiplet structure should be employed. We establish the extent to which these errors are made by critical appraisal of over 220 papers published in selected years between 2015 and 2024.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrosion Science\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrosion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010938X25006857\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrosion Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010938X25006857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
XPS分析通常用于腐蚀研究,以分析一系列金属的腐蚀产物和保护层。在过渡金属特别是铁的情况下,提取包括鉴定和定量在内的化学物种信息需要对金属2p谱进行复杂的拟合。不幸的是,对于这些金属2p光电子峰的拟合要求有广泛的误解。在高自旋fe2p化合物的情况下,存在一个基于多峰和卫星峰的复杂结构,这通常被忽略。本文综述了XPS在黑色金属腐蚀防护研究中的应用;我们量化了文献中XPS Fe 2p光谱的误读程度。研究发现,在超过70 %的论文中,对拟合fe2p的要求存在着顽固的误解,这可以分为三组。首先,在最严重的情况下,似乎缺乏对自旋轨道耦合的理解,这导致了主要的Fe 2p3/2和Fe 2p1/2峰,而后者被错误地分配给了不同的化学物质。其次,卫星结构通常被分配给不同的化学物质。第三,使用单峰来拟合化学成分,而应采用复杂的多峰结构。我们通过对2015年至2024年间选定年份发表的220多篇论文进行批判性评估,确定了这些错误的程度。
Widespread erroneous analysis of the Fe 2p peak in X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy examination in corrosion studies
XPS analysis is routinely used in corrosion studies to analyse corrosion product and protective layers on a range of metals. In the case of transition metals and especially iron, the extraction of information about chemical species including identification and quantification requires complex fitting of the metal 2p spectrum. Unfortunately, there is extensive misunderstanding of what is required for fitting of these metal 2p photoelectron peaks. In the case of high spin Fe 2p compounds there is a complex structure based on multiplet and satellite peaks which is often ignored. In this review of the application of XPS in the study of corrosion and protection of ferrous metals; we quantify the extent of misinterpretation of XPS Fe 2p spectra within the literature. It is found that in over 70 % of papers there is an adamant misunderstanding of the requirements for fitting Fe 2p, which can be divided into three groups. First, in the most serious case, there seems to be a lack of understanding of spin orbit coupling which gives rise to the major Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 peaks with the latter being incorrectly assigned to a different chemical species. Second, satellite structures are often assigned to a different chemical species. Third, single peaks are used to fit chemical components whereas a complex multiplet structure should be employed. We establish the extent to which these errors are made by critical appraisal of over 220 papers published in selected years between 2015 and 2024.
期刊介绍:
Corrosion occurrence and its practical control encompass a vast array of scientific knowledge. Corrosion Science endeavors to serve as the conduit for the exchange of ideas, developments, and research across all facets of this field, encompassing both metallic and non-metallic corrosion. The scope of this international journal is broad and inclusive. Published papers span from highly theoretical inquiries to essentially practical applications, covering diverse areas such as high-temperature oxidation, passivity, anodic oxidation, biochemical corrosion, stress corrosion cracking, and corrosion control mechanisms and methodologies.
This journal publishes original papers and critical reviews across the spectrum of pure and applied corrosion, material degradation, and surface science and engineering. It serves as a crucial link connecting metallurgists, materials scientists, and researchers investigating corrosion and degradation phenomena. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in the vital field of corrosion science.