基于机器学习的工业催化剂上CO2甲烷化反应动力学建模

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Hugo Pétremand, , , Julia Witte, , , Oliver Kröcher, , and , Emanuele Moioli*, 
{"title":"基于机器学习的工业催化剂上CO2甲烷化反应动力学建模","authors":"Hugo Pétremand,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Julia Witte,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Oliver Kröcher,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Emanuele Moioli*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In industrial practice, it is common to use commercially available catalysts to facilitate chemical reactions. Unfortunately, due to the confidential composition and complex properties of the catalysts, a precise understanding of the reaction mechanism and intermediates is often difficult to obtain. This complicates the development of robust kinetic models, delaying an effective reactor design. This raises the question of whether machine learning (ML)-based regressions can reliably describe kinetics without requiring detailed reaction mechanisms. In this work, this research question was addressed by performing kinetic experiments on a commercial Ni/ZrO<sub>2</sub>-based CO<sub>2</sub> methanation catalyst (Himetz by Kanadevia Corporation) in an isothermal, fixed bed reactor. A 216-point data set was thus obtained at various temperatures (220–300 °C), partial pressures (0.8–3 bar) and gas hourly space velocities (50,000–700,000 h<sup>–1</sup>) combinations. The data set was employed to perform several ML-based regressions, and to compare them in terms of adequacy of the fit, according to root mean squared error (RMSE). The two best performing ML-based models, Gaussian Process Regression and 1-layer neural network were selected and assessed against two standard kinetic modeling approaches: power law and Langmuir–Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW). The ML-based models outperformed the power law according to RMSE and were comparable to the LHHW model to describe the kinetic regime of the catalyst. When implemented in a reactor model, the ML-based regressions also accurately predicted methane yield with results comparable to the state-of-the-art LHHW model and even outperformed the LHHW model by addressing nonideal behavior in a nonisothermal reactor. This showed that ML-based kinetics are promising in situations where little mechanistic information is available, generating models that can be employed for reactor design purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"64 41","pages":"19864–19875"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02947","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based Kinetic Modeling of the CO2 Methanation Reaction over an Industrial Catalyst\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Pétremand,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Julia Witte,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Oliver Kröcher,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Emanuele Moioli*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In industrial practice, it is common to use commercially available catalysts to facilitate chemical reactions. Unfortunately, due to the confidential composition and complex properties of the catalysts, a precise understanding of the reaction mechanism and intermediates is often difficult to obtain. This complicates the development of robust kinetic models, delaying an effective reactor design. This raises the question of whether machine learning (ML)-based regressions can reliably describe kinetics without requiring detailed reaction mechanisms. In this work, this research question was addressed by performing kinetic experiments on a commercial Ni/ZrO<sub>2</sub>-based CO<sub>2</sub> methanation catalyst (Himetz by Kanadevia Corporation) in an isothermal, fixed bed reactor. A 216-point data set was thus obtained at various temperatures (220–300 °C), partial pressures (0.8–3 bar) and gas hourly space velocities (50,000–700,000 h<sup>–1</sup>) combinations. The data set was employed to perform several ML-based regressions, and to compare them in terms of adequacy of the fit, according to root mean squared error (RMSE). The two best performing ML-based models, Gaussian Process Regression and 1-layer neural network were selected and assessed against two standard kinetic modeling approaches: power law and Langmuir–Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW). The ML-based models outperformed the power law according to RMSE and were comparable to the LHHW model to describe the kinetic regime of the catalyst. When implemented in a reactor model, the ML-based regressions also accurately predicted methane yield with results comparable to the state-of-the-art LHHW model and even outperformed the LHHW model by addressing nonideal behavior in a nonisothermal reactor. This showed that ML-based kinetics are promising in situations where little mechanistic information is available, generating models that can be employed for reactor design purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":\"64 41\",\"pages\":\"19864–19875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02947\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02947\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c02947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在工业实践中,通常使用市售催化剂来促进化学反应。不幸的是,由于催化剂的机密组成和复杂的性质,对反应机理和中间体的精确理解往往很难获得。这使得稳健动力学模型的发展变得复杂,延迟了有效反应堆的设计。这就提出了一个问题,即基于机器学习(ML)的回归是否可以在不需要详细反应机制的情况下可靠地描述动力学。在这项工作中,通过在等温固定床反应器中对基于Ni/ zro2的商用CO2甲烷化催化剂(由Kanadevia公司生产的Himetz)进行动力学实验来解决这个研究问题。因此,在不同温度(220-300°C)、分压(0.8-3 bar)和气体每小时空速(50,000-700,000 h-1)组合下,获得了216个点的数据集。该数据集用于执行几个基于ml的回归,并根据均方根误差(RMSE)比较它们的拟合充分性。选择了两种表现最好的基于ml的模型,高斯过程回归和1层神经网络,并根据两种标准的动力学建模方法:幂律和Langmuir-Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW)进行了评估。根据RMSE,基于ml的模型优于幂律,并且可以与LHHW模型相媲美,以描述催化剂的动力学状态。当在反应器模型中实施时,基于ml的回归也能准确预测甲烷产量,其结果与最先进的LHHW模型相当,甚至在解决非等温反应器中的非理想行为方面优于LHHW模型。这表明,基于ml的动力学在机械信息很少的情况下是有前途的,可以生成用于反应堆设计目的的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine Learning-Based Kinetic Modeling of the CO2 Methanation Reaction over an Industrial Catalyst

Machine Learning-Based Kinetic Modeling of the CO2 Methanation Reaction over an Industrial Catalyst

In industrial practice, it is common to use commercially available catalysts to facilitate chemical reactions. Unfortunately, due to the confidential composition and complex properties of the catalysts, a precise understanding of the reaction mechanism and intermediates is often difficult to obtain. This complicates the development of robust kinetic models, delaying an effective reactor design. This raises the question of whether machine learning (ML)-based regressions can reliably describe kinetics without requiring detailed reaction mechanisms. In this work, this research question was addressed by performing kinetic experiments on a commercial Ni/ZrO2-based CO2 methanation catalyst (Himetz by Kanadevia Corporation) in an isothermal, fixed bed reactor. A 216-point data set was thus obtained at various temperatures (220–300 °C), partial pressures (0.8–3 bar) and gas hourly space velocities (50,000–700,000 h–1) combinations. The data set was employed to perform several ML-based regressions, and to compare them in terms of adequacy of the fit, according to root mean squared error (RMSE). The two best performing ML-based models, Gaussian Process Regression and 1-layer neural network were selected and assessed against two standard kinetic modeling approaches: power law and Langmuir–Hinshelwood-Hougen-Watson (LHHW). The ML-based models outperformed the power law according to RMSE and were comparable to the LHHW model to describe the kinetic regime of the catalyst. When implemented in a reactor model, the ML-based regressions also accurately predicted methane yield with results comparable to the state-of-the-art LHHW model and even outperformed the LHHW model by addressing nonideal behavior in a nonisothermal reactor. This showed that ML-based kinetics are promising in situations where little mechanistic information is available, generating models that can be employed for reactor design purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信