PRISM-5更新:基于DSM-5标准的双重诊断评估的西班牙语版访谈的改编和验证。

IF 2.8 0 PSYCHIATRY
Claudio Tamarit, Maria Pellicer-Roca, María Alias-Ferrí, Carlos Roncero, Javier Didia-Attas, Francina Fonseca, Julián Andrés Mateus, Joan I MestrePintó, Marta Torrens
{"title":"PRISM-5更新:基于DSM-5标准的双重诊断评估的西班牙语版访谈的改编和验证。","authors":"Claudio Tamarit, Maria Pellicer-Roca, María Alias-Ferrí, Carlos Roncero, Javier Didia-Attas, Francina Fonseca, Julián Andrés Mateus, Joan I MestrePintó, Marta Torrens","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing individuals with co-occurring substance use and other mental disorders (SUDs and MDs) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and masking effects. Semi-structured interviews, like the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM), are essential for diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to update and validate the Spanish PRISM-IV to DSM-5 criteria, providing evidence of reliability based on its ability to assess Dual Disorders (DDs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PRISM-5 was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish to ensure equivalence with the original English version. The interview was computerized using BLAISE© software and pilot-tested. A cross-sectional study with patients recruited from specialized treatment centers in Spain and Argentina compared PRISM-5 diagnoses to those established through the Longitudinal, Expert, All Data (LEAD) method, providing evidence of diagnostic agreement through Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>197 patients were recruited (69% male, mean age = 35.6). PRISM-5 showed substantial evidence of diagnostic agreement for most SUDs (k = 0.62-0.77), including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, sedative, and amphetamine use disorders, with excellent agreement for past heroin use disorder (k = 0.83). For MDs, substantial agreement was found for major depression, ADHD and psychotic, panic, and personality disorders (k = 0.63-0.73), while moderate agreement was observed for substance-induced and persistent depression (k = 0.59-0.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRISM-5 provided strong evidence of diagnostic reliability in its Spanish version, with substantial agreement across most diagnoses. Compared to the PRISM-IV, it showed similar evidence of reliability, with some notable improvements in areas such as alcohol and cannabis use disorders. These findings underscore the instrument's robustness and value for diagnosing DDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PRISM-5 Update: Adaptation and validation of the Spanish Version Interview for Dual Diagnosis Assessment Based on DSM-5 Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Tamarit, Maria Pellicer-Roca, María Alias-Ferrí, Carlos Roncero, Javier Didia-Attas, Francina Fonseca, Julián Andrés Mateus, Joan I MestrePintó, Marta Torrens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing individuals with co-occurring substance use and other mental disorders (SUDs and MDs) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and masking effects. Semi-structured interviews, like the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM), are essential for diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to update and validate the Spanish PRISM-IV to DSM-5 criteria, providing evidence of reliability based on its ability to assess Dual Disorders (DDs).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The PRISM-5 was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish to ensure equivalence with the original English version. The interview was computerized using BLAISE© software and pilot-tested. A cross-sectional study with patients recruited from specialized treatment centers in Spain and Argentina compared PRISM-5 diagnoses to those established through the Longitudinal, Expert, All Data (LEAD) method, providing evidence of diagnostic agreement through Cohen's kappa coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>197 patients were recruited (69% male, mean age = 35.6). PRISM-5 showed substantial evidence of diagnostic agreement for most SUDs (k = 0.62-0.77), including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, sedative, and amphetamine use disorders, with excellent agreement for past heroin use disorder (k = 0.83). For MDs, substantial agreement was found for major depression, ADHD and psychotic, panic, and personality disorders (k = 0.63-0.73), while moderate agreement was observed for substance-induced and persistent depression (k = 0.59-0.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRISM-5 provided strong evidence of diagnostic reliability in its Spanish version, with substantial agreement across most diagnoses. Compared to the PRISM-IV, it showed similar evidence of reliability, with some notable improvements in areas such as alcohol and cannabis use disorders. These findings underscore the instrument's robustness and value for diagnosing DDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpmh.2025.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于症状重叠和掩面效应,诊断同时发生物质使用和其他精神障碍(sud和MDs)的个体具有挑战性。半结构化访谈,如物质与精神障碍精神病学研究访谈(PRISM),对于诊断的准确性至关重要。本研究旨在更新和验证西班牙PRISM-IV到DSM-5标准,提供基于其评估双重障碍(dd)能力的可靠性证据。材料和方法:PRISM-5被翻译和文化适应为西班牙语,以确保与原英文版本等效。访谈采用BLAISE©软件进行计算机化处理,并进行了试点测试。一项从西班牙和阿根廷专业治疗中心招募的患者的横断面研究将PRISM-5诊断与通过纵向,专家,全数据(LEAD)方法建立的诊断进行了比较,通过Cohen的kappa系数提供了诊断一致性的证据。结果:共纳入197例患者(69%为男性,平均年龄35.6岁)。PRISM-5显示了对大多数SUDs的诊断一致性(k = 0.62-0.77),包括酒精、大麻、可卡因、海洛因、镇静剂和安非他明使用障碍,对过去的海洛因使用障碍的诊断一致性非常好(k = 0.83)。对于MDs,重度抑郁、ADHD、精神病性、恐慌和人格障碍的结果基本一致(k = 0.63-0.73),而物质诱导和持续性抑郁的结果中等一致(k = 0.59-0.60)。结论:PRISM-5在其西班牙语版本中提供了强有力的诊断可靠性证据,在大多数诊断中具有实质性的一致性。与PRISM-IV相比,它显示出类似的可靠性证据,在酒精和大麻使用障碍等领域有一些显著改善。这些发现强调了该仪器的稳健性和诊断dd的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PRISM-5 Update: Adaptation and validation of the Spanish Version Interview for Dual Diagnosis Assessment Based on DSM-5 Criteria.

Introduction: Diagnosing individuals with co-occurring substance use and other mental disorders (SUDs and MDs) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and masking effects. Semi-structured interviews, like the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM), are essential for diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to update and validate the Spanish PRISM-IV to DSM-5 criteria, providing evidence of reliability based on its ability to assess Dual Disorders (DDs).

Material and methods: The PRISM-5 was translated and culturally adapted to Spanish to ensure equivalence with the original English version. The interview was computerized using BLAISE© software and pilot-tested. A cross-sectional study with patients recruited from specialized treatment centers in Spain and Argentina compared PRISM-5 diagnoses to those established through the Longitudinal, Expert, All Data (LEAD) method, providing evidence of diagnostic agreement through Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: 197 patients were recruited (69% male, mean age = 35.6). PRISM-5 showed substantial evidence of diagnostic agreement for most SUDs (k = 0.62-0.77), including alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, heroin, sedative, and amphetamine use disorders, with excellent agreement for past heroin use disorder (k = 0.83). For MDs, substantial agreement was found for major depression, ADHD and psychotic, panic, and personality disorders (k = 0.63-0.73), while moderate agreement was observed for substance-induced and persistent depression (k = 0.59-0.60).

Conclusions: PRISM-5 provided strong evidence of diagnostic reliability in its Spanish version, with substantial agreement across most diagnoses. Compared to the PRISM-IV, it showed similar evidence of reliability, with some notable improvements in areas such as alcohol and cannabis use disorders. These findings underscore the instrument's robustness and value for diagnosing DDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信