加巴喷丁用于胶质母细胞瘤治疗:使用活性比较物增强的真实世界数据分析。

Christine Ann Pittman Ballard, Kevin M Goff, Mallika P Patel, Kyle M Walsh, Michelle Monje, Quinn T Ostrom
{"title":"加巴喷丁用于胶质母细胞瘤治疗:使用活性比较物增强的真实世界数据分析。","authors":"Christine Ann Pittman Ballard, Kevin M Goff, Mallika P Patel, Kyle M Walsh, Michelle Monje, Quinn T Ostrom","doi":"10.1101/2025.09.24.25335799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glioblastoma 'hijacks' neuronal pathways to drive tumor growth, and drugs affecting the function of these pathways may potentiate survival gains. Recent studies have suggested clinical benefits with post-diagnostic use of gabapentin. We assessed the impact of taking gabapentin after glioblastoma diagnosis utilizing an active comparator model in a population-based dataset of older adults in the United States. We leveraged a cohort of glioblastoma patients >65 years old who received resection, radiation, and temozolomide from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data paired with Medicare claims. Those receiving post-diagnostic gabapentin (TMZ+G) were compared to those receiving standard of care treatment only (TMZ), and two active comparators (duloxetine [TMZ+D], and levetiracetam [TMZ+L]). Association between medication use and overall survival was assessed using cox proportional hazards models adjusted for known prognostic factors. Out of 2,494 individuals, 797 (32%) received TMZ, 146 (5.9%) received TMZ+G, 38 (1.5%) received TMZ+D, and 1,513 (60.7%) received TMZ+L. Median survival among those receiving TMZ (10 months) as compared to all other groups (TMZ+G=16.3 months, TMZ+D=16 months; TMZ+L=13.0 months). TMZ+G was associated with 47% decrease in hazard of death (p<0.001) compared to TMZ, and a 32% decrease (p<0.001) compared to TMZ+L. Women had a 43% decrease in hazard of death (p<0.001) in TMZ+G as compared to TMZ+L, while this difference was non-significant in men (p=0.204). These results show survival benefit associated with gabapentin and supports ongoing work therapeutically targeting neuron-glioma interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gabapentin repurposing for glioblastoma therapy: Real-world data analyses augmented by use of active comparators.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Ann Pittman Ballard, Kevin M Goff, Mallika P Patel, Kyle M Walsh, Michelle Monje, Quinn T Ostrom\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.09.24.25335799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Glioblastoma 'hijacks' neuronal pathways to drive tumor growth, and drugs affecting the function of these pathways may potentiate survival gains. Recent studies have suggested clinical benefits with post-diagnostic use of gabapentin. We assessed the impact of taking gabapentin after glioblastoma diagnosis utilizing an active comparator model in a population-based dataset of older adults in the United States. We leveraged a cohort of glioblastoma patients >65 years old who received resection, radiation, and temozolomide from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data paired with Medicare claims. Those receiving post-diagnostic gabapentin (TMZ+G) were compared to those receiving standard of care treatment only (TMZ), and two active comparators (duloxetine [TMZ+D], and levetiracetam [TMZ+L]). Association between medication use and overall survival was assessed using cox proportional hazards models adjusted for known prognostic factors. Out of 2,494 individuals, 797 (32%) received TMZ, 146 (5.9%) received TMZ+G, 38 (1.5%) received TMZ+D, and 1,513 (60.7%) received TMZ+L. Median survival among those receiving TMZ (10 months) as compared to all other groups (TMZ+G=16.3 months, TMZ+D=16 months; TMZ+L=13.0 months). TMZ+G was associated with 47% decrease in hazard of death (p<0.001) compared to TMZ, and a 32% decrease (p<0.001) compared to TMZ+L. Women had a 43% decrease in hazard of death (p<0.001) in TMZ+G as compared to TMZ+L, while this difference was non-significant in men (p=0.204). These results show survival benefit associated with gabapentin and supports ongoing work therapeutically targeting neuron-glioma interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486040/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.24.25335799\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.24.25335799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胶质母细胞瘤“劫持”神经通路来驱动肿瘤生长,而影响这些通路功能的药物可能会增加生存率。最近的研究表明诊断后使用加巴喷丁有临床益处。我们在美国老年人的基于人群的数据集中利用主动比较模型评估了胶质母细胞瘤诊断后服用加巴喷丁的影响。我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据(与医疗保险索赔相匹配)中选取了一组年龄在65岁至65岁之间接受切除、放疗和替莫唑胺治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者。将接受诊断后加巴喷丁(TMZ+G)治疗的患者与仅接受标准护理治疗(TMZ)的患者以及两种有效比较药物(度洛西汀[TMZ+D]和左乙拉西坦[TMZ+L])的患者进行比较。使用cox比例风险模型对已知预后因素进行校正,评估药物使用与总生存率之间的关系。在2494名患者中,797人(32%)接受TMZ治疗,146人(5.9%)接受TMZ+G治疗,38人(1.5%)接受TMZ+D治疗,1513人(60.7%)接受TMZ+L治疗。接受TMZ组的中位生存期(10个月)与其他所有组相比(TMZ+G=16.3个月,TMZ+D=16个月,TMZ+L=13.0个月)。TMZ+G与死亡风险降低47%相关(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gabapentin repurposing for glioblastoma therapy: Real-world data analyses augmented by use of active comparators.

Glioblastoma 'hijacks' neuronal pathways to drive tumor growth, and drugs affecting the function of these pathways may potentiate survival gains. Recent studies have suggested clinical benefits with post-diagnostic use of gabapentin. We assessed the impact of taking gabapentin after glioblastoma diagnosis utilizing an active comparator model in a population-based dataset of older adults in the United States. We leveraged a cohort of glioblastoma patients >65 years old who received resection, radiation, and temozolomide from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data paired with Medicare claims. Those receiving post-diagnostic gabapentin (TMZ+G) were compared to those receiving standard of care treatment only (TMZ), and two active comparators (duloxetine [TMZ+D], and levetiracetam [TMZ+L]). Association between medication use and overall survival was assessed using cox proportional hazards models adjusted for known prognostic factors. Out of 2,494 individuals, 797 (32%) received TMZ, 146 (5.9%) received TMZ+G, 38 (1.5%) received TMZ+D, and 1,513 (60.7%) received TMZ+L. Median survival among those receiving TMZ (10 months) as compared to all other groups (TMZ+G=16.3 months, TMZ+D=16 months; TMZ+L=13.0 months). TMZ+G was associated with 47% decrease in hazard of death (p<0.001) compared to TMZ, and a 32% decrease (p<0.001) compared to TMZ+L. Women had a 43% decrease in hazard of death (p<0.001) in TMZ+G as compared to TMZ+L, while this difference was non-significant in men (p=0.204). These results show survival benefit associated with gabapentin and supports ongoing work therapeutically targeting neuron-glioma interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信