日本老龄化社会媒体使用模式、社会心理健康和脆弱性的两阶段分析。

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Yuki Nakada, Yuna Seo
{"title":"日本老龄化社会媒体使用模式、社会心理健康和脆弱性的两阶段分析。","authors":"Yuki Nakada, Yuna Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan's super-aged society, frailty prevention is a critical public health issue. While social media use is increasing among older adults, its impact on well-being is complex and not fully understood beyond a simple active-passive dichotomy. This study aims to explore the relationship between specific social media usage patterns, users' psychosocial backgrounds, and frailty risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 950 community-dwelling older adults in Japan. Frailty was assessed using the Kihon Checklist. A two-stage analysis was performed: 1) K-means cluster analysis was used to classify participants based on eight SOCIAL MEDIA use behavior variables, followed by a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare psychosocial characteristics across clusters; 2) Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to identify specific behaviors associated with frailty after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct user clusters were identified: \"Balanced, reality-oriented communicators\" (n = 333), \"Low-engagement, passive users\" (n = 419), and \"Active, multi-purpose users\" (n = 198). The \"Low-engagement\" group reported the highest levels of loneliness and unhappiness, despite high real-world social participation. Regression analysis revealed that the specific behavior of \"using social media to keep a record of my own activities\" (self-documentation) was independently associated with an increased risk of frailty (β = 0.105, p < .05). Conversely, high exercise self-efficacy (p < .001), sleep satisfaction (p < .01), and satisfaction with face-to-face communication (p < .001) were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social media usage patterns reflect underlying psychosocial states, but are not direct predictors of frailty. The motivation-driven behavior of self-documentation, rather than general activity, is a risk factor. These findings suggest that interventions should focus on the quality and function of social media use, promoting digital literacy that enhances well-being in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":"14 6","pages":"100091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A two-stage analysis of social media use patterns, psychosocial well-being, and frailty in an aging Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Nakada, Yuna Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan's super-aged society, frailty prevention is a critical public health issue. While social media use is increasing among older adults, its impact on well-being is complex and not fully understood beyond a simple active-passive dichotomy. This study aims to explore the relationship between specific social media usage patterns, users' psychosocial backgrounds, and frailty risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 950 community-dwelling older adults in Japan. Frailty was assessed using the Kihon Checklist. A two-stage analysis was performed: 1) K-means cluster analysis was used to classify participants based on eight SOCIAL MEDIA use behavior variables, followed by a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare psychosocial characteristics across clusters; 2) Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to identify specific behaviors associated with frailty after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct user clusters were identified: \\\"Balanced, reality-oriented communicators\\\" (n = 333), \\\"Low-engagement, passive users\\\" (n = 419), and \\\"Active, multi-purpose users\\\" (n = 198). The \\\"Low-engagement\\\" group reported the highest levels of loneliness and unhappiness, despite high real-world social participation. Regression analysis revealed that the specific behavior of \\\"using social media to keep a record of my own activities\\\" (self-documentation) was independently associated with an increased risk of frailty (β = 0.105, p < .05). Conversely, high exercise self-efficacy (p < .001), sleep satisfaction (p < .01), and satisfaction with face-to-face communication (p < .001) were protective factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social media usage patterns reflect underlying psychosocial states, but are not direct predictors of frailty. The motivation-driven behavior of self-documentation, rather than general activity, is a risk factor. These findings suggest that interventions should focus on the quality and function of social media use, promoting digital literacy that enhances well-being in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"100091\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Frailty & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在日本的超老龄化社会中,预防虚弱是一个关键的公共卫生问题。虽然老年人越来越多地使用社交媒体,但它对幸福感的影响是复杂的,除了简单的主动-被动二分法之外,还没有完全理解。本研究旨在探讨特定社交媒体使用模式、用户心理社会背景与脆弱风险之间的关系。方法:我们对日本950名居住在社区的老年人进行了横断面在线调查。虚弱程度采用Kihon检查表进行评估。采用两阶段分析:1)采用k -均值聚类分析对8个社交媒体使用行为变量进行分类,然后采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同聚类的社会心理特征;2)在调整协变量后,采用有序逻辑回归分析识别与脆弱性相关的具体行为。结果:确定了三个不同的用户群:“平衡,面向现实的沟通者”(n = 333),“低参与度,被动用户”(n = 419)和“活跃,多用途用户”(n = 198)。尽管现实社会参与度很高,但“低参与度”组的孤独感和不快乐程度最高。回归分析显示,“使用社交媒体记录自己的活动”(自我记录)的具体行为与脆弱性增加的风险独立相关(β = 0.105, p < 0.05)。相反,高运动自我效能感(p < 0.001)、睡眠满意度(p < 0.01)和面对面交流满意度(p < 0.001)是保护因素。结论:社交媒体的使用模式反映了潜在的心理社会状态,但并不是脆弱的直接预测因素。动机驱动的自我记录行为,而不是一般的活动,是一个风险因素。这些发现表明,干预措施应侧重于社交媒体使用的质量和功能,促进提高老年人福祉的数字素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A two-stage analysis of social media use patterns, psychosocial well-being, and frailty in an aging Japan.

Background: In Japan's super-aged society, frailty prevention is a critical public health issue. While social media use is increasing among older adults, its impact on well-being is complex and not fully understood beyond a simple active-passive dichotomy. This study aims to explore the relationship between specific social media usage patterns, users' psychosocial backgrounds, and frailty risk.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 950 community-dwelling older adults in Japan. Frailty was assessed using the Kihon Checklist. A two-stage analysis was performed: 1) K-means cluster analysis was used to classify participants based on eight SOCIAL MEDIA use behavior variables, followed by a Kruskal-Wallis test to compare psychosocial characteristics across clusters; 2) Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to identify specific behaviors associated with frailty after adjusting for covariates.

Results: Three distinct user clusters were identified: "Balanced, reality-oriented communicators" (n = 333), "Low-engagement, passive users" (n = 419), and "Active, multi-purpose users" (n = 198). The "Low-engagement" group reported the highest levels of loneliness and unhappiness, despite high real-world social participation. Regression analysis revealed that the specific behavior of "using social media to keep a record of my own activities" (self-documentation) was independently associated with an increased risk of frailty (β = 0.105, p < .05). Conversely, high exercise self-efficacy (p < .001), sleep satisfaction (p < .01), and satisfaction with face-to-face communication (p < .001) were protective factors.

Conclusion: Social media usage patterns reflect underlying psychosocial states, but are not direct predictors of frailty. The motivation-driven behavior of self-documentation, rather than general activity, is a risk factor. These findings suggest that interventions should focus on the quality and function of social media use, promoting digital literacy that enhances well-being in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Frailty & Aging
Journal of Frailty & Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons.          The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信