虚拟现实模拟学习微创牙髓学:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Chalinee Srakoopun, Siriwan Suebnukarn, Peter Haddawy, Maximilian Kaluschke, Rene Weller, Myat Su Yin, Panuroot Aguilar, Panupat Phumpatrakom, Kriangkrai Pinchamnankool, Kamon Budsaba, Gabriel Zachmann
{"title":"虚拟现实模拟学习微创牙髓学:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Chalinee Srakoopun, Siriwan Suebnukarn, Peter Haddawy, Maximilian Kaluschke, Rene Weller, Myat Su Yin, Panuroot Aguilar, Panupat Phumpatrakom, Kriangkrai Pinchamnankool, Kamon Budsaba, Gabriel Zachmann","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-07889-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning minimally invasive endodontic techniques presents unique challenges, requiring precise tooth structure preservation and strong spatial awareness. This study evaluated a clinically realistic virtual reality (VR) simulator, featuring eye-tracking feedback and automated outcome scoring, as an innovative tool to support student learning in minimally invasive endodontics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 fourth-year preclinical dental students assigned to either a VR group (n = 15) or a standard phantom head (PH) group (n = 15). The VR system featured high-fidelity dental arch modeling, dual haptic devices, a head-mounted display with eye-gaze and tool trajectory tracking (mirror and handpiece), and automated outcome scoring. All students completed three 1-hour training sessions and performed both Traditional Access Cavity (TradAC) and Conservative Access Cavity (ConsAC) techniques. The primary outcome was tooth volume loss assessed via micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Secondary outcomes included procedural error scores (rated by blinded experts) and task completion time. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated pre-post differences. A split-plot ANOVA analyzed training method (between-subjects) and access technique (within-subjects).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements were observed across all outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant main effect of training method or interaction. A significant main effect of access technique was found for tooth volume loss (F(1,28) = 10.46, p = 0.003) and task completion time (F(1,28) = 6.86, p = 0.014), favoring ConsAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the feasibility of automated virtual reality (VR) simulation as a scalable and effective tool to support student learning in minimally invasive endodontic procedures within preclinical dental education.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was registered on 29 April 2025, at the TCTR registry with the study registration number TCTR20250502004.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"1310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual reality simulation for learning minimally invasive endodontics: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Chalinee Srakoopun, Siriwan Suebnukarn, Peter Haddawy, Maximilian Kaluschke, Rene Weller, Myat Su Yin, Panuroot Aguilar, Panupat Phumpatrakom, Kriangkrai Pinchamnankool, Kamon Budsaba, Gabriel Zachmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-025-07889-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning minimally invasive endodontic techniques presents unique challenges, requiring precise tooth structure preservation and strong spatial awareness. This study evaluated a clinically realistic virtual reality (VR) simulator, featuring eye-tracking feedback and automated outcome scoring, as an innovative tool to support student learning in minimally invasive endodontics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 fourth-year preclinical dental students assigned to either a VR group (n = 15) or a standard phantom head (PH) group (n = 15). The VR system featured high-fidelity dental arch modeling, dual haptic devices, a head-mounted display with eye-gaze and tool trajectory tracking (mirror and handpiece), and automated outcome scoring. All students completed three 1-hour training sessions and performed both Traditional Access Cavity (TradAC) and Conservative Access Cavity (ConsAC) techniques. The primary outcome was tooth volume loss assessed via micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Secondary outcomes included procedural error scores (rated by blinded experts) and task completion time. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated pre-post differences. A split-plot ANOVA analyzed training method (between-subjects) and access technique (within-subjects).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant improvements were observed across all outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant main effect of training method or interaction. A significant main effect of access technique was found for tooth volume loss (F(1,28) = 10.46, p = 0.003) and task completion time (F(1,28) = 6.86, p = 0.014), favoring ConsAC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study supports the feasibility of automated virtual reality (VR) simulation as a scalable and effective tool to support student learning in minimally invasive endodontic procedures within preclinical dental education.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This randomized controlled trial was registered on 29 April 2025, at the TCTR registry with the study registration number TCTR20250502004.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12492536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07889-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07889-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习微创牙髓技术具有独特的挑战,需要精确的牙齿结构保存和强烈的空间意识。本研究评估了一种临床逼真的虚拟现实(VR)模拟器,该模拟器具有眼动追踪反馈和自动结果评分功能,可作为支持学生微创牙髓学学习的创新工具。方法:对30名四年级临床前牙科学生进行前瞻性随机对照试验,将其分为VR组(n = 15)和标准幻头组(n = 15)。VR系统具有高保真牙弓建模,双触觉设备,具有眼睛注视和工具轨迹跟踪(镜子和手机)的头戴式显示器,以及自动结果评分。所有学生完成了三个1小时的培训课程,并进行了传统通道腔(TradAC)和保守通道腔(ConsAC)技术。主要结果是通过微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估牙齿体积损失。次要结果包括程序错误评分(由盲法专家评定)和任务完成时间。Wilcoxon符号秩检验评估前后差异。分割图方差分析分析了训练方法(受试者间)和访问技术(受试者内)。结果:两组的所有结果均有显著改善(p)。结论:该研究支持了自动虚拟现实(VR)模拟作为一种可扩展和有效的工具的可行性,以支持学生在临床前牙科教育中学习微创牙髓治疗。试验注册:该随机对照试验于2025年4月29日在TCTR注册中心注册,研究注册号为TCTR20250502004。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Virtual reality simulation for learning minimally invasive endodontics: a randomized controlled trial.

Virtual reality simulation for learning minimally invasive endodontics: a randomized controlled trial.

Virtual reality simulation for learning minimally invasive endodontics: a randomized controlled trial.

Virtual reality simulation for learning minimally invasive endodontics: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Learning minimally invasive endodontic techniques presents unique challenges, requiring precise tooth structure preservation and strong spatial awareness. This study evaluated a clinically realistic virtual reality (VR) simulator, featuring eye-tracking feedback and automated outcome scoring, as an innovative tool to support student learning in minimally invasive endodontics.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 30 fourth-year preclinical dental students assigned to either a VR group (n = 15) or a standard phantom head (PH) group (n = 15). The VR system featured high-fidelity dental arch modeling, dual haptic devices, a head-mounted display with eye-gaze and tool trajectory tracking (mirror and handpiece), and automated outcome scoring. All students completed three 1-hour training sessions and performed both Traditional Access Cavity (TradAC) and Conservative Access Cavity (ConsAC) techniques. The primary outcome was tooth volume loss assessed via micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Secondary outcomes included procedural error scores (rated by blinded experts) and task completion time. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests evaluated pre-post differences. A split-plot ANOVA analyzed training method (between-subjects) and access technique (within-subjects).

Results: Significant improvements were observed across all outcomes in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant main effect of training method or interaction. A significant main effect of access technique was found for tooth volume loss (F(1,28) = 10.46, p = 0.003) and task completion time (F(1,28) = 6.86, p = 0.014), favoring ConsAC.

Conclusion: This study supports the feasibility of automated virtual reality (VR) simulation as a scalable and effective tool to support student learning in minimally invasive endodontic procedures within preclinical dental education.

Trial registration: This randomized controlled trial was registered on 29 April 2025, at the TCTR registry with the study registration number TCTR20250502004.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信