在凝视感知过程中的眼球运动。

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Gernot Horstmann
{"title":"在凝视感知过程中的眼球运动。","authors":"Gernot Horstmann","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.12.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The gaze of other people is of interest to human observers, particularly in cases of direct gaze, that is, when it targets the observer. Gaze direction research has successfully clarified some of the mechanisms underlying gaze perception, but little is known about the active perception of direct gaze. Three eye-tracking experiments were conducted in which fixations and scan paths were recorded during the task to judge direct gaze. Somewhat surprisingly, judgments were issued after a single eye fixation only in a minority of trials. In most cases, observers fixated both eyes of a looker model, sometimes even scanning them repeatedly. Fixation duration showed a consistent pattern, where first fixations were longer when the task response followed immediately, and second fixations were shorter just before the response. A direct-gaze bias was tested but was not found: visiting the second eye was even more likely when the first fixation was on a straight-gazing rather than an averted eye. There was no systematic pattern in the final fixation, contradicting the expectation that it would fall on the abducting (leading) eye. It is argued that overt looking behavior during direct gaze judgments reflects a cumulative decision process that spans over consecutive fixations. Several factors may contribute to the high incidence of multiple-eye scans, including vergence and angle kappa. Vergence, in particular, is considered an important candidate, because the depth of fixation is ambiguous when only one eye is visible, but can be limited by probing the gaze direction of both eyes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 12","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye movements during gaze perception.\",\"authors\":\"Gernot Horstmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.25.12.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The gaze of other people is of interest to human observers, particularly in cases of direct gaze, that is, when it targets the observer. Gaze direction research has successfully clarified some of the mechanisms underlying gaze perception, but little is known about the active perception of direct gaze. Three eye-tracking experiments were conducted in which fixations and scan paths were recorded during the task to judge direct gaze. Somewhat surprisingly, judgments were issued after a single eye fixation only in a minority of trials. In most cases, observers fixated both eyes of a looker model, sometimes even scanning them repeatedly. Fixation duration showed a consistent pattern, where first fixations were longer when the task response followed immediately, and second fixations were shorter just before the response. A direct-gaze bias was tested but was not found: visiting the second eye was even more likely when the first fixation was on a straight-gazing rather than an averted eye. There was no systematic pattern in the final fixation, contradicting the expectation that it would fall on the abducting (leading) eye. It is argued that overt looking behavior during direct gaze judgments reflects a cumulative decision process that spans over consecutive fixations. Several factors may contribute to the high incidence of multiple-eye scans, including vergence and angle kappa. Vergence, in particular, is considered an important candidate, because the depth of fixation is ambiguous when only one eye is visible, but can be limited by probing the gaze direction of both eyes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.12.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.12.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类观察者对他人的凝视很感兴趣,特别是在直接凝视的情况下,也就是说,当它瞄准观察者时。凝视方向的研究已经成功地阐明了凝视感知的一些机制,但对直接凝视的主动感知知之甚少。进行了三个眼动追踪实验,记录了在判断直视时的注视和扫描路径。有些令人惊讶的是,只有在少数审判中,判决是在单眼注视之后做出的。在大多数情况下,观察者盯着模特的两只眼睛,有时甚至反复扫描它们。注视时间表现出一致的模式,当任务反应立即发生时,第一次注视时间较长,而第二次注视时间较短。我们测试了直视的偏见,但没有发现:当第一次注视的是直视的眼睛而不是转向的眼睛时,更有可能去看第二只眼睛。在最后的固定中没有系统的模式,这与它会落在外展(前眼)上的预期相矛盾。有人认为,在直接注视判断过程中,明显的注视行为反映了一个跨越连续注视的累积决策过程。有几个因素可能导致多眼扫描的高发生率,包括会聚和角度卡帕。特别是聚光,被认为是一个重要的候选,因为当只有一只眼睛可见时,注视的深度是模糊的,但可以通过探测两只眼睛的注视方向来限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eye movements during gaze perception.

The gaze of other people is of interest to human observers, particularly in cases of direct gaze, that is, when it targets the observer. Gaze direction research has successfully clarified some of the mechanisms underlying gaze perception, but little is known about the active perception of direct gaze. Three eye-tracking experiments were conducted in which fixations and scan paths were recorded during the task to judge direct gaze. Somewhat surprisingly, judgments were issued after a single eye fixation only in a minority of trials. In most cases, observers fixated both eyes of a looker model, sometimes even scanning them repeatedly. Fixation duration showed a consistent pattern, where first fixations were longer when the task response followed immediately, and second fixations were shorter just before the response. A direct-gaze bias was tested but was not found: visiting the second eye was even more likely when the first fixation was on a straight-gazing rather than an averted eye. There was no systematic pattern in the final fixation, contradicting the expectation that it would fall on the abducting (leading) eye. It is argued that overt looking behavior during direct gaze judgments reflects a cumulative decision process that spans over consecutive fixations. Several factors may contribute to the high incidence of multiple-eye scans, including vergence and angle kappa. Vergence, in particular, is considered an important candidate, because the depth of fixation is ambiguous when only one eye is visible, but can be limited by probing the gaze direction of both eyes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信