{"title":"解码难以置信:通过噪声通道模型的普通话句子解释。","authors":"Ruihua Mao, Sihan Chen, Edward Gibson","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01774-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The noisy channel language comprehension proposal posits that comprehenders detect and correct errors when interpreting sentences. This study replicates and extends Zhan et al. (2023), testing the model in Mandarin Chinese with three syntactic alternations: (1) Active-Passive-BA sentences, (2) Double Object (DO)-Initial position Prepositional Object (PO)-Final position PO sentences, and (3) Transitive-Initial position Adverbial Intransitive-Final position Adverbial Intransitive sentences. In each alternation, the first two structures were adopted from Zhan et al. (2023), while the third was introduced in this study. These alternations require different numbers and types of edits to transform implausible sentences into plausible ones. Participants read test items and answer corresponding comprehension questions, which indicate whether they interpret the item literally. The results aligned with Zhan et al. (2023)'s findings, indicating that Mandarin participants were most likely to make inferences for implausible sentences resulting from deleting or inserting a single morpheme, followed by those formed by a noun phrase exchange across a function word, and least likely to make inferences for implausible sentences obtained through a noun phrase exchange across a main verb. The inclusion of novel structures reinforces the robustness of the noisy-channel framework and highlights how language-specific properties influence language comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding the implausible: Mandarin sentence interpretation through the noisy channel model.\",\"authors\":\"Ruihua Mao, Sihan Chen, Edward Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13421-025-01774-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The noisy channel language comprehension proposal posits that comprehenders detect and correct errors when interpreting sentences. This study replicates and extends Zhan et al. (2023), testing the model in Mandarin Chinese with three syntactic alternations: (1) Active-Passive-BA sentences, (2) Double Object (DO)-Initial position Prepositional Object (PO)-Final position PO sentences, and (3) Transitive-Initial position Adverbial Intransitive-Final position Adverbial Intransitive sentences. In each alternation, the first two structures were adopted from Zhan et al. (2023), while the third was introduced in this study. These alternations require different numbers and types of edits to transform implausible sentences into plausible ones. Participants read test items and answer corresponding comprehension questions, which indicate whether they interpret the item literally. The results aligned with Zhan et al. (2023)'s findings, indicating that Mandarin participants were most likely to make inferences for implausible sentences resulting from deleting or inserting a single morpheme, followed by those formed by a noun phrase exchange across a function word, and least likely to make inferences for implausible sentences obtained through a noun phrase exchange across a main verb. The inclusion of novel structures reinforces the robustness of the noisy-channel framework and highlights how language-specific properties influence language comprehension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01774-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01774-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
噪声通道语言理解建议认为,理解者在翻译句子时发现并纠正错误。本研究复制并扩展了Zhan et al.(2023)的模型,在汉语普通话中使用三种句法变化对模型进行了测试:(1)主动-被动ba句,(2)双宾语(DO)-初始位置介词宾语(PO)-最终位置PO句,以及(3)及物-初始位置状语不及物-最终位置状语不及物句。在每次交替中,前两种结构都采用了Zhan et al.(2023)的方法,而第三种结构在本研究中被引入。这些改变需要不同数量和类型的编辑来将难以置信的句子变成可信的句子。参与者阅读测试项目并回答相应的理解问题,这表明他们是否从字面上理解了项目。结果与Zhan等人(2023)的研究结果一致,表明普通话参与者最有可能对删除或插入单个语素产生的不合理句子进行推理,其次是通过功能词交换名词短语形成的不合理句子,而最不可能对通过主动词交换名词短语获得的不合理句子进行推理。新结构的加入加强了噪声信道框架的稳健性,并强调了语言特定属性如何影响语言理解。
Decoding the implausible: Mandarin sentence interpretation through the noisy channel model.
The noisy channel language comprehension proposal posits that comprehenders detect and correct errors when interpreting sentences. This study replicates and extends Zhan et al. (2023), testing the model in Mandarin Chinese with three syntactic alternations: (1) Active-Passive-BA sentences, (2) Double Object (DO)-Initial position Prepositional Object (PO)-Final position PO sentences, and (3) Transitive-Initial position Adverbial Intransitive-Final position Adverbial Intransitive sentences. In each alternation, the first two structures were adopted from Zhan et al. (2023), while the third was introduced in this study. These alternations require different numbers and types of edits to transform implausible sentences into plausible ones. Participants read test items and answer corresponding comprehension questions, which indicate whether they interpret the item literally. The results aligned with Zhan et al. (2023)'s findings, indicating that Mandarin participants were most likely to make inferences for implausible sentences resulting from deleting or inserting a single morpheme, followed by those formed by a noun phrase exchange across a function word, and least likely to make inferences for implausible sentences obtained through a noun phrase exchange across a main verb. The inclusion of novel structures reinforces the robustness of the noisy-channel framework and highlights how language-specific properties influence language comprehension.
期刊介绍:
Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.