基于app的超声模拟与传统学习方法在胎儿超声心动图医学教育中的结合。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Tim Hartmann, Duygu Adiyaman, Christiane Lato, Wolfgang Janni, Julien Hartmann, Krisztian Lato
{"title":"基于app的超声模拟与传统学习方法在胎儿超声心动图医学教育中的结合。","authors":"Tim Hartmann, Duygu Adiyaman, Christiane Lato, Wolfgang Janni, Julien Hartmann, Krisztian Lato","doi":"10.1055/a-2715-5044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines whether combining conventional textbook materials with the app-based ultrasound simulator Scanbooster enhances learning outcomes in fetal echocardiography, compared to using either method alone. It also evaluates the impact of the learning sequence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>210 medical students were randomized into two groups: • PDF→App Group (n=103): Textbook study followed by the Scanbooster ultrasound simulator app • App→PDF Group (n=107): Scanbooster ultrasound simulator app followed by textbook study Knowledge was assessed before and after by identifying marked structures in ultrasound videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age (p=0.564) and prior ultrasound experience (p=0.746). Both groups showed a significant improvement in identifying sonographic structures after the learning phase (p<0.001), with a mean learning effect of 104.96% and 102.16%, respectively, for fetal echocardiography- specific knowledge. The order of learning materials had no significant effect on learning success (p>0.05). In comparison with our previous study, we found that the combination of app-based simulation and textbooks led to the best learning outcomes in fetal echocardiography. This approach resulted in significantly higher performance compared to pure PDF learning (p<0.001) and was slightly, yet still significantly better than pure simulation (p=0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of conventional textbook material and app-based ultrasound simulation is the most effective approach for teaching fetal echocardiography. The learning sequence does not significantly impact the outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49400,"journal":{"name":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of App-Based Ultrasound Simulation and Conventional Learning Methods in Medical Education for Fetal Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Hartmann, Duygu Adiyaman, Christiane Lato, Wolfgang Janni, Julien Hartmann, Krisztian Lato\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2715-5044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines whether combining conventional textbook materials with the app-based ultrasound simulator Scanbooster enhances learning outcomes in fetal echocardiography, compared to using either method alone. It also evaluates the impact of the learning sequence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>210 medical students were randomized into two groups: • PDF→App Group (n=103): Textbook study followed by the Scanbooster ultrasound simulator app • App→PDF Group (n=107): Scanbooster ultrasound simulator app followed by textbook study Knowledge was assessed before and after by identifying marked structures in ultrasound videos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age (p=0.564) and prior ultrasound experience (p=0.746). Both groups showed a significant improvement in identifying sonographic structures after the learning phase (p<0.001), with a mean learning effect of 104.96% and 102.16%, respectively, for fetal echocardiography- specific knowledge. The order of learning materials had no significant effect on learning success (p>0.05). In comparison with our previous study, we found that the combination of app-based simulation and textbooks led to the best learning outcomes in fetal echocardiography. This approach resulted in significantly higher performance compared to pure PDF learning (p<0.001) and was slightly, yet still significantly better than pure simulation (p=0.031).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of conventional textbook material and app-based ultrasound simulation is the most effective approach for teaching fetal echocardiography. The learning sequence does not significantly impact the outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultraschall in Der Medizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultraschall in Der Medizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2715-5044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultraschall in Der Medizin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2715-5044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨与单独使用任何一种方法相比,将传统的教科书材料与基于应用程序的超声模拟器Scanbooster相结合是否能提高胎儿超声心动图的学习效果。它还评估了学习顺序的影响。材料与方法:210名医学生随机分为两组:•PDF→App组(n=103):教科书学习后使用Scanbooster超声模拟器应用程序•App→PDF组(n=107):使用Scanbooster超声模拟器应用程序后使用教科书学习,通过识别超声视频中的标记结构来评估前后的知识。结果:两组间年龄(p=0.564)、超声经验(p=0.746)差异无统计学意义。两组在学习期后超声结构识别能力均有显著提高(p0.05)。与我们之前的研究相比,我们发现基于应用程序的模拟与教科书相结合可以获得最佳的胎儿超声心动图学习效果。结论:传统教材与基于app的超声模拟相结合是最有效的胎儿超声心动图教学方法。学习顺序对结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combination of App-Based Ultrasound Simulation and Conventional Learning Methods in Medical Education for Fetal Echocardiography.

Purpose: This study examines whether combining conventional textbook materials with the app-based ultrasound simulator Scanbooster enhances learning outcomes in fetal echocardiography, compared to using either method alone. It also evaluates the impact of the learning sequence.

Materials and methods: 210 medical students were randomized into two groups: • PDF→App Group (n=103): Textbook study followed by the Scanbooster ultrasound simulator app • App→PDF Group (n=107): Scanbooster ultrasound simulator app followed by textbook study Knowledge was assessed before and after by identifying marked structures in ultrasound videos.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding age (p=0.564) and prior ultrasound experience (p=0.746). Both groups showed a significant improvement in identifying sonographic structures after the learning phase (p<0.001), with a mean learning effect of 104.96% and 102.16%, respectively, for fetal echocardiography- specific knowledge. The order of learning materials had no significant effect on learning success (p>0.05). In comparison with our previous study, we found that the combination of app-based simulation and textbooks led to the best learning outcomes in fetal echocardiography. This approach resulted in significantly higher performance compared to pure PDF learning (p<0.001) and was slightly, yet still significantly better than pure simulation (p=0.031).

Conclusion: The combination of conventional textbook material and app-based ultrasound simulation is the most effective approach for teaching fetal echocardiography. The learning sequence does not significantly impact the outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ultraschall in Der Medizin
Ultraschall in Der Medizin 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultraschall in der Medizin / European Journal of Ultrasound publishes scientific papers and contributions from a variety of disciplines on the diagnostic and therapeutic applications of ultrasound with an emphasis on clinical application. Technical papers with a physiological theme as well as the interaction between ultrasound and biological systems might also occasionally be considered for peer review and publication, provided that the translational relevance is high and the link with clinical applications is tight. The editors and the publishers reserve the right to publish selected articles online only. Authors are welcome to submit supplementary video material. Letters and comments are also accepted, promoting a vivid exchange of opinions and scientific discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信