后covid -19时代中国医务人员疫苗接种和口罩佩戴的平衡策略:建模研究和成本效益分析

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yiyu Hu, Meng Jia, Ying Jiang, Rui Zhao, Shu Su
{"title":"后covid -19时代中国医务人员疫苗接种和口罩佩戴的平衡策略:建模研究和成本效益分析","authors":"Yiyu Hu, Meng Jia, Ying Jiang, Rui Zhao, Shu Su","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After the comprehensive easing of COVID-19 restrictions in China in December 2022, the emergence of additional virus variants and repeat infections has garnered increased attention, particularly among key populations such as medical staff. Our study aims to evaluate various combinations of vaccination and mask-wearing strategies to identify the optimal strategy for the post-COVID-19 era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model simulated a cohort of 100 000 Chinese medical staff five years after the complete lifting of epidemic restrictions. The health care system's perspective was adopted, and parameters were sourced from Chinese government-released data and relevant literature. Strategies with varying vaccination coverage (0/25/50/75%) and mask-wearing coverage (0/30/60/90%) were considered. All costs were expressed as USD with a 3% annual discounting rate, and effectiveness was measured via quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate cost-effectiveness uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time gross domestic product per capita in China (12 440 USD), the strategy of 90% mask-wearing and 75% vaccination coverage among medical staff was the most cost-effective (501 USD/quality-adjusted life year). This intervention reduced infection and mortality rates by 24.5% and 24.6%, while minimising health care costs with a cost per reversed infection of 1040 USD. Above 30% mask coverage, higher vaccine coverage further increased cost-effectiveness further. On the 16th day after lifting COVID-19 restrictions in the Markov model, there were 19 586 fewer symptomatic cases of first-time COVID-19 infection compared to the status quo (peak infections on that day = 22 293), with a reinfection circle around 197 days. Sensitivity analysis indicated that monthly mask costs is the most sensitive factor influencing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; beyond 6.2 USD/mo, the optimal strategy lost cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In managing multiple waves of the epidemic, prioritising mask usage over vaccination is recommended for medical staff to achieve optimal cost-effectiveness. Exploring ways to extend vaccine efficacy duration would further enhance protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04283"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491910/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing strategies in vaccination and mask-wearing for Chinese medical staff in post-COVID-19 era: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yiyu Hu, Meng Jia, Ying Jiang, Rui Zhao, Shu Su\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After the comprehensive easing of COVID-19 restrictions in China in December 2022, the emergence of additional virus variants and repeat infections has garnered increased attention, particularly among key populations such as medical staff. Our study aims to evaluate various combinations of vaccination and mask-wearing strategies to identify the optimal strategy for the post-COVID-19 era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Markov model simulated a cohort of 100 000 Chinese medical staff five years after the complete lifting of epidemic restrictions. The health care system's perspective was adopted, and parameters were sourced from Chinese government-released data and relevant literature. Strategies with varying vaccination coverage (0/25/50/75%) and mask-wearing coverage (0/30/60/90%) were considered. All costs were expressed as USD with a 3% annual discounting rate, and effectiveness was measured via quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate cost-effectiveness uncertainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time gross domestic product per capita in China (12 440 USD), the strategy of 90% mask-wearing and 75% vaccination coverage among medical staff was the most cost-effective (501 USD/quality-adjusted life year). This intervention reduced infection and mortality rates by 24.5% and 24.6%, while minimising health care costs with a cost per reversed infection of 1040 USD. Above 30% mask coverage, higher vaccine coverage further increased cost-effectiveness further. On the 16th day after lifting COVID-19 restrictions in the Markov model, there were 19 586 fewer symptomatic cases of first-time COVID-19 infection compared to the status quo (peak infections on that day = 22 293), with a reinfection circle around 197 days. Sensitivity analysis indicated that monthly mask costs is the most sensitive factor influencing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; beyond 6.2 USD/mo, the optimal strategy lost cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In managing multiple waves of the epidemic, prioritising mask usage over vaccination is recommended for medical staff to achieve optimal cost-effectiveness. Exploring ways to extend vaccine efficacy duration would further enhance protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12491910/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在2022年12月中国全面放松COVID-19限制后,出现了更多的病毒变体和重复感染,特别是在医务人员等关键人群中,引起了越来越多的关注。我们的研究旨在评估疫苗接种和戴口罩策略的各种组合,以确定后covid -19时代的最佳策略。方法:采用马尔可夫模型模拟全面解除疫情限制5年后中国10万名医务人员队列。采用卫生保健系统视角,参数来源于中国政府公布的数据和相关文献。考虑了不同疫苗接种覆盖率(0/25/50/75%)和佩戴口罩覆盖率(0/30/60/90%)的策略。所有成本以美元表示,年贴现率为3%,有效性通过质量调整生命年来衡量。进行敏感性分析以评估成本-效果不确定性。结果:在一次性人均国内生产总值(gdp)支付意愿阈值(12440美元)下,医务人员90%佩戴口罩和75%疫苗接种率的策略最具成本效益(501美元/质量调整生命年)。这一干预措施将感染率和死亡率分别降低了24.5%和24.6%,同时最大限度地降低了医疗保健费用,每次逆转感染的费用为1040美元。超过30%的口罩覆盖率,更高的疫苗覆盖率进一步提高了成本效益。在马尔可夫模型解除限制后的第16天,新冠肺炎首次感染病例较现状(当日感染高峰为22 293例)减少19 586例,再感染周期约为197天。敏感性分析表明,每月口罩费用是影响增量成本-效果比的最敏感因素;超过6.2美元/月,最优策略失去了成本效益。结论:在应对多波疫情时,建议医务人员优先使用口罩而不是接种疫苗,以实现最佳成本效益。探索延长疫苗效力持续时间的方法将进一步加强保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Balancing strategies in vaccination and mask-wearing for Chinese medical staff in post-COVID-19 era: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Balancing strategies in vaccination and mask-wearing for Chinese medical staff in post-COVID-19 era: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Balancing strategies in vaccination and mask-wearing for Chinese medical staff in post-COVID-19 era: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Balancing strategies in vaccination and mask-wearing for Chinese medical staff in post-COVID-19 era: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Background: After the comprehensive easing of COVID-19 restrictions in China in December 2022, the emergence of additional virus variants and repeat infections has garnered increased attention, particularly among key populations such as medical staff. Our study aims to evaluate various combinations of vaccination and mask-wearing strategies to identify the optimal strategy for the post-COVID-19 era.

Methods: A Markov model simulated a cohort of 100 000 Chinese medical staff five years after the complete lifting of epidemic restrictions. The health care system's perspective was adopted, and parameters were sourced from Chinese government-released data and relevant literature. Strategies with varying vaccination coverage (0/25/50/75%) and mask-wearing coverage (0/30/60/90%) were considered. All costs were expressed as USD with a 3% annual discounting rate, and effectiveness was measured via quality-adjusted life year. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate cost-effectiveness uncertainty.

Results: At a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time gross domestic product per capita in China (12 440 USD), the strategy of 90% mask-wearing and 75% vaccination coverage among medical staff was the most cost-effective (501 USD/quality-adjusted life year). This intervention reduced infection and mortality rates by 24.5% and 24.6%, while minimising health care costs with a cost per reversed infection of 1040 USD. Above 30% mask coverage, higher vaccine coverage further increased cost-effectiveness further. On the 16th day after lifting COVID-19 restrictions in the Markov model, there were 19 586 fewer symptomatic cases of first-time COVID-19 infection compared to the status quo (peak infections on that day = 22 293), with a reinfection circle around 197 days. Sensitivity analysis indicated that monthly mask costs is the most sensitive factor influencing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; beyond 6.2 USD/mo, the optimal strategy lost cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: In managing multiple waves of the epidemic, prioritising mask usage over vaccination is recommended for medical staff to achieve optimal cost-effectiveness. Exploring ways to extend vaccine efficacy duration would further enhance protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信