Watch-PAT在房颤患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断中的多设定评价。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Patrick L Stafford, Robert Roth, John Ferguson, Kenneth C Bilchick, Andrew E Darby, Sula Mazimba, Nishaki Mehta, Eric M Davis, Heather Bonner, Yeilim Cho, Jeongok Logan, Michelle Sobremonte-King, Younghoon Kwon
{"title":"Watch-PAT在房颤患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停诊断中的多设定评价。","authors":"Patrick L Stafford, Robert Roth, John Ferguson, Kenneth C Bilchick, Andrew E Darby, Sula Mazimba, Nishaki Mehta, Eric M Davis, Heather Bonner, Yeilim Cho, Jeongok Logan, Michelle Sobremonte-King, Younghoon Kwon","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have elevated risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)-based device, the Watch-PAT (WP) has been increasingly used as a home OSA test. We conducted a multi-setting evaluation of WP in OSA diagnosis by comparing results from in-lab PSG, in-lab WP, and home WP in AF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AF patients underwent an in-lab PSG with concurrent in-lab WP and two consecutive nights of home WP. OSA was categorized into no OSA, mild, moderate, and severe OSA by apnea hypopnea index (AHI; <5, ≥5-<15, ≥15-<29, ≥30). The primary outcome was OSA severity agreement between in-lab PSG vs. home WP. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP, as well as in-lab WP vs. home WP. Night-to-night variability of consecutive nights of home WP was also evaluated. Results were expressed by Cohen's Kappa (κ) for AHI scoring rules 1a and 1b.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 patients were included for analysis. There was slight and fair agreement between in-lab PSG and home WP (κ=0.15, 0.40 for score rule 1a and 1b, respectively), substantial agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP (κ=0.63, 0.71), moderate agreement between in-lab WP and home WP (κ=0.59, 0.59), and almost perfect agreement between first night home WP and second night home WP (κ=0.87, 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate overall slight to fair agreement between home WP vs. in-lab PSG, suggesting inadequate performance against the standard reference test. This should be considered when interpreting the results of home WP. Other evaluations demonstrated moderate agreement for in-lab WP and home WP in the classification of OSA severity, substantial agreement between in-lab PSG and in-lab WP, and almost perfect agreement in the comparison both home WP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi setting evaluation of Watch-PAT in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick L Stafford, Robert Roth, John Ferguson, Kenneth C Bilchick, Andrew E Darby, Sula Mazimba, Nishaki Mehta, Eric M Davis, Heather Bonner, Yeilim Cho, Jeongok Logan, Michelle Sobremonte-King, Younghoon Kwon\",\"doi\":\"10.5664/jcsm.11898\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have elevated risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)-based device, the Watch-PAT (WP) has been increasingly used as a home OSA test. We conducted a multi-setting evaluation of WP in OSA diagnosis by comparing results from in-lab PSG, in-lab WP, and home WP in AF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AF patients underwent an in-lab PSG with concurrent in-lab WP and two consecutive nights of home WP. OSA was categorized into no OSA, mild, moderate, and severe OSA by apnea hypopnea index (AHI; <5, ≥5-<15, ≥15-<29, ≥30). The primary outcome was OSA severity agreement between in-lab PSG vs. home WP. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP, as well as in-lab WP vs. home WP. Night-to-night variability of consecutive nights of home WP was also evaluated. Results were expressed by Cohen's Kappa (κ) for AHI scoring rules 1a and 1b.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27 patients were included for analysis. There was slight and fair agreement between in-lab PSG and home WP (κ=0.15, 0.40 for score rule 1a and 1b, respectively), substantial agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP (κ=0.63, 0.71), moderate agreement between in-lab WP and home WP (κ=0.59, 0.59), and almost perfect agreement between first night home WP and second night home WP (κ=0.87, 0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate overall slight to fair agreement between home WP vs. in-lab PSG, suggesting inadequate performance against the standard reference test. This should be considered when interpreting the results of home WP. Other evaluations demonstrated moderate agreement for in-lab WP and home WP in the classification of OSA severity, substantial agreement between in-lab PSG and in-lab WP, and almost perfect agreement in the comparison both home WP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11898\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11898","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:心房颤动(AF)患者发生阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的风险增高。Watch-PAT (WP)是一种基于外周动脉血压计(PAT)的设备,已越来越多地用于家庭OSA测试。我们通过比较AF患者的实验室PSG、实验室WP和家庭WP的结果,对WP在OSA诊断中的多设置进行了评估。方法:房颤患者在实验室进行PSG,同时进行实验室WP和连续两晚的家庭WP。根据呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)将OSA分为无OSA、轻度、中度和重度OSA;结果:纳入27例患者进行分析。实验室内PSG和家庭WP之间有轻微和公平的一致性(κ=0.15,分别为评分规则1a和1b),实验室内PSG和实验室内WP之间有实质性的一致性(κ=0.63, 0.71),实验室内WP和家庭WP之间有中度一致性(κ=0.59, 0.59),第一晚在家WP和第二晚在家WP之间几乎完全一致(κ=0.87, 0.89)。结论:我们证明家庭WP与实验室PSG之间的总体一致性轻微到公平,表明与标准参考测试相比表现不佳。在解释家庭工作负荷的结果时应考虑到这一点。其他评估显示,实验室WP和家庭WP在OSA严重程度的分类上有中等程度的一致,实验室PSG和实验室WP之间有实质性的一致,在家庭WP的比较中几乎完全一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi setting evaluation of Watch-PAT in obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Study objectives: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have elevated risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). A peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT)-based device, the Watch-PAT (WP) has been increasingly used as a home OSA test. We conducted a multi-setting evaluation of WP in OSA diagnosis by comparing results from in-lab PSG, in-lab WP, and home WP in AF patients.

Methods: AF patients underwent an in-lab PSG with concurrent in-lab WP and two consecutive nights of home WP. OSA was categorized into no OSA, mild, moderate, and severe OSA by apnea hypopnea index (AHI; <5, ≥5-<15, ≥15-<29, ≥30). The primary outcome was OSA severity agreement between in-lab PSG vs. home WP. Secondary outcomes included the agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP, as well as in-lab WP vs. home WP. Night-to-night variability of consecutive nights of home WP was also evaluated. Results were expressed by Cohen's Kappa (κ) for AHI scoring rules 1a and 1b.

Results: 27 patients were included for analysis. There was slight and fair agreement between in-lab PSG and home WP (κ=0.15, 0.40 for score rule 1a and 1b, respectively), substantial agreement between in-lab PSG vs. in-lab WP (κ=0.63, 0.71), moderate agreement between in-lab WP and home WP (κ=0.59, 0.59), and almost perfect agreement between first night home WP and second night home WP (κ=0.87, 0.89).

Conclusions: We demonstrate overall slight to fair agreement between home WP vs. in-lab PSG, suggesting inadequate performance against the standard reference test. This should be considered when interpreting the results of home WP. Other evaluations demonstrated moderate agreement for in-lab WP and home WP in the classification of OSA severity, substantial agreement between in-lab PSG and in-lab WP, and almost perfect agreement in the comparison both home WP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信