两种新型硅酸钙基水泥在初级磨牙间接牙髓治疗中的比较:临床评价研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Sonu Acharya, Deepa Gurunathan, Ali A Assiry, Alexander Maniangat Luke, Krishna Prasad Shetty, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari
{"title":"两种新型硅酸钙基水泥在初级磨牙间接牙髓治疗中的比较:临床评价研究。","authors":"Sonu Acharya, Deepa Gurunathan, Ali A Assiry, Alexander Maniangat Luke, Krishna Prasad Shetty, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulp capping is a vital dental procedure used to preserve the vitality of teeth affected by deep caries lesions without irreversible pulpitis. The use of modern bioceramic materials has enhanced the predictability of vital pulp therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical success of two calcium silicate-based cements (NeoPUTTY and e-MTA Putty) as pulp capping materials for indirect pulp capping in carious primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Indirect pulp therapy (IPT) was performed on 52 deciduous molars in 26 patients presenting with deep carious lesions. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups: NeoPUTTY (26 teeth) and e-MTA Putty (26 teeth). Patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment to evaluate the clinical success of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Pearson's Chi-square test was employed to compare success and failure rates between NeoPUTTY and e-MTA Putty at four different time intervals (30, 90, 180, and 365 days) and overall success and failure rates regardless of the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical success rate was similar in both NeoPUTTY and Kids e-MTA Putty in 1st month. In 3rd month, there was no significant difference in the distribution of clinical success between NeoPUTTY and Kids e-MTA Putty (<i>p</i> = 0.110). At 6 months, a significantly high percentage of failure was elucidated in Kids e-MTA Putty (30.8%) compared to NeoPUTTY (3.8%) (<i>p</i> = 0.024). At 12 months, the percentage of failure was significantly high in Kids e-MTA Putty (46.2%) compared to NeoPUTTY (7.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.004). A significant increase in the median radiographic dentin was elucidated in NeoPUTTY at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to Kids e-Putty (<i>p</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeoPUTTY is clinically successful compared to Kids e-MTA Putty. Similarly, there is a consistent increase in radiographic dentin in NeoPUTTY compared to Kids e-MTA Putty.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Acharya S, Gurunathan D, Assiry AA, et al. Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):671-676.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 6","pages":"671-676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sonu Acharya, Deepa Gurunathan, Ali A Assiry, Alexander Maniangat Luke, Krishna Prasad Shetty, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulp capping is a vital dental procedure used to preserve the vitality of teeth affected by deep caries lesions without irreversible pulpitis. The use of modern bioceramic materials has enhanced the predictability of vital pulp therapy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical success of two calcium silicate-based cements (NeoPUTTY and e-MTA Putty) as pulp capping materials for indirect pulp capping in carious primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Indirect pulp therapy (IPT) was performed on 52 deciduous molars in 26 patients presenting with deep carious lesions. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups: NeoPUTTY (26 teeth) and e-MTA Putty (26 teeth). Patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment to evaluate the clinical success of the procedures.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Pearson's Chi-square test was employed to compare success and failure rates between NeoPUTTY and e-MTA Putty at four different time intervals (30, 90, 180, and 365 days) and overall success and failure rates regardless of the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical success rate was similar in both NeoPUTTY and Kids e-MTA Putty in 1st month. In 3rd month, there was no significant difference in the distribution of clinical success between NeoPUTTY and Kids e-MTA Putty (<i>p</i> = 0.110). At 6 months, a significantly high percentage of failure was elucidated in Kids e-MTA Putty (30.8%) compared to NeoPUTTY (3.8%) (<i>p</i> = 0.024). At 12 months, the percentage of failure was significantly high in Kids e-MTA Putty (46.2%) compared to NeoPUTTY (7.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.004). A significant increase in the median radiographic dentin was elucidated in NeoPUTTY at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to Kids e-Putty (<i>p</i> = 0.000).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NeoPUTTY is clinically successful compared to Kids e-MTA Putty. Similarly, there is a consistent increase in radiographic dentin in NeoPUTTY compared to Kids e-MTA Putty.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Acharya S, Gurunathan D, Assiry AA, et al. Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):671-676.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"671-676\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙髓盖盖是一项重要的牙科手术,用于保护受深部龋病影响的牙齿的活力,而不发生不可逆的牙髓炎。现代生物陶瓷材料的使用提高了重要牙髓治疗的可预测性。目的:本研究旨在评估两种硅酸钙水泥(NeoPUTTY和e-MTA腻子)作为牙髓间接盖盖材料在龋齿乳牙中的临床成功。材料与方法:对26例深部龋齿患者的52颗乳牙进行间接牙髓治疗。随机分为NeoPUTTY组(26颗牙)和e-MTA Putty组(26颗牙)。在治疗后1、3、6和12个月对患者进行监测,以评估手术的临床成功。统计分析:采用SPSS 21.0版社会科学统计软件包进行统计分析。Pearson卡方检验比较了NeoPUTTY和e-MTA Putty在4个不同时间间隔(30、90、180和365天)的成功率和失败率,以及在不同时间间隔下的总体成功率和失败率。结果:NeoPUTTY和Kids e-MTA Putty在第1个月的临床成功率相似。在第3个月,NeoPUTTY和Kids e-MTA Putty的临床成功率分布无显著差异(p = 0.110)。6个月时,Kids e-MTA Putty的失败率(30.8%)明显高于NeoPUTTY (3.8%) (p = 0.024)。12个月时,Kids e-MTA Putty的失败率(46.2%)明显高于NeoPUTTY (7.7%) (p = 0.004)。与Kids e-Putty相比,NeoPUTTY在第1、3、6和12个月时的牙本质中位数有显著增加(p = 0.000)。结论:与Kids e-MTA Putty相比,NeoPUTTY在临床上是成功的。同样,与Kids e-MTA腻子相比,NeoPUTTY的放射学牙本质持续增加。如何引用本文:Acharya S, Gurunathan D, Assiry AA等。两种新型硅酸钙基水泥在初级磨牙间接牙髓治疗中的比较:临床评价研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(6):671-676。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study.

Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study.

Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study.

Background: Pulp capping is a vital dental procedure used to preserve the vitality of teeth affected by deep caries lesions without irreversible pulpitis. The use of modern bioceramic materials has enhanced the predictability of vital pulp therapy.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the clinical success of two calcium silicate-based cements (NeoPUTTY and e-MTA Putty) as pulp capping materials for indirect pulp capping in carious primary teeth.

Materials and methods: Indirect pulp therapy (IPT) was performed on 52 deciduous molars in 26 patients presenting with deep carious lesions. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups: NeoPUTTY (26 teeth) and e-MTA Putty (26 teeth). Patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttreatment to evaluate the clinical success of the procedures.

Statistical analysis: Statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Pearson's Chi-square test was employed to compare success and failure rates between NeoPUTTY and e-MTA Putty at four different time intervals (30, 90, 180, and 365 days) and overall success and failure rates regardless of the time intervals.

Results: The clinical success rate was similar in both NeoPUTTY and Kids e-MTA Putty in 1st month. In 3rd month, there was no significant difference in the distribution of clinical success between NeoPUTTY and Kids e-MTA Putty (p = 0.110). At 6 months, a significantly high percentage of failure was elucidated in Kids e-MTA Putty (30.8%) compared to NeoPUTTY (3.8%) (p = 0.024). At 12 months, the percentage of failure was significantly high in Kids e-MTA Putty (46.2%) compared to NeoPUTTY (7.7%) (p = 0.004). A significant increase in the median radiographic dentin was elucidated in NeoPUTTY at 1st, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months compared to Kids e-Putty (p = 0.000).

Conclusion: NeoPUTTY is clinically successful compared to Kids e-MTA Putty. Similarly, there is a consistent increase in radiographic dentin in NeoPUTTY compared to Kids e-MTA Putty.

How to cite this article: Acharya S, Gurunathan D, Assiry AA, et al. Comparison of Two New Calcium Silicate-based Cements in Indirect Pulp Therapy in Primary Molar Teeth: Clinical Evaluative Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):671-676.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信