接受和未接受Papoose Board治疗的儿童的长期牙科焦虑水平:一项回顾性队列试验研究。

Q3 Dentistry
Ruedee Sakulratchata, Sutatsana Amornwanishsan, Tananporn Wongtawisombat, Anankajeekarn Wonglamai, Pornsuda Norchai
{"title":"接受和未接受Papoose Board治疗的儿童的长期牙科焦虑水平:一项回顾性队列试验研究。","authors":"Ruedee Sakulratchata, Sutatsana Amornwanishsan, Tananporn Wongtawisombat, Anankajeekarn Wonglamai, Pornsuda Norchai","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of the papoose board in pediatric dental treatment has been controversial due to ethical concerns about psychological impact and informed consent. Although its use is restricted or prohibited in some regions, it remains accepted in others for managing uncooperative or highly anxious children, particularly in emergency dental settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare dental anxiety levels in children who had undergone dental treatment using a papoose board at least 3 years earlier (papoose board group) with those who had never been treated with a papoose board (control group). Additionally, within the papoose board group, the study examined differences in dental anxiety levels between children who remembered their papoose board experience (recalled group) and those who did not (unrecalled group).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety children, aged 7-11 years, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly selected and assessed for dental anxiety using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDASf) at a university dental hospital or <i>via</i> video call. The correlation between dental anxiety levels and the variables was analyzed using Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 45 participants in each of the papoose board and control groups. Within the papoose board group, 16 children (35.6%) recalled their papoose board experiences, while 29 children (64.4%) did not, with an average of 5.2 ± 1.61 years since the last experience. No significant difference was found in dental anxiety levels between the papoose board group and the control group (<i>p =</i> 0.833), nor between the recalled and unrecalled groups (<i>p =</i> 0.608).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in long-term dental anxiety between children who had undergone treatment with a papoose board and those who had not, or between children who recalled the experience and those who did not.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Sakulratchata R, Amornwanishsan S, Wongtawisombat T, <i>et al.</i> Long-term Dental Anxiety Levels in Children Treated with and without Papoose Board: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):703-708.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 6","pages":"703-708"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term Dental Anxiety Levels in Children Treated with and without Papoose Board: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ruedee Sakulratchata, Sutatsana Amornwanishsan, Tananporn Wongtawisombat, Anankajeekarn Wonglamai, Pornsuda Norchai\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of the papoose board in pediatric dental treatment has been controversial due to ethical concerns about psychological impact and informed consent. Although its use is restricted or prohibited in some regions, it remains accepted in others for managing uncooperative or highly anxious children, particularly in emergency dental settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare dental anxiety levels in children who had undergone dental treatment using a papoose board at least 3 years earlier (papoose board group) with those who had never been treated with a papoose board (control group). Additionally, within the papoose board group, the study examined differences in dental anxiety levels between children who remembered their papoose board experience (recalled group) and those who did not (unrecalled group).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ninety children, aged 7-11 years, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly selected and assessed for dental anxiety using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDASf) at a university dental hospital or <i>via</i> video call. The correlation between dental anxiety levels and the variables was analyzed using Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 45 participants in each of the papoose board and control groups. Within the papoose board group, 16 children (35.6%) recalled their papoose board experiences, while 29 children (64.4%) did not, with an average of 5.2 ± 1.61 years since the last experience. No significant difference was found in dental anxiety levels between the papoose board group and the control group (<i>p =</i> 0.833), nor between the recalled and unrecalled groups (<i>p =</i> 0.608).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference in long-term dental anxiety between children who had undergone treatment with a papoose board and those who had not, or between children who recalled the experience and those who did not.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Sakulratchata R, Amornwanishsan S, Wongtawisombat T, <i>et al.</i> Long-term Dental Anxiety Levels in Children Treated with and without Papoose Board: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):703-708.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 6\",\"pages\":\"703-708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于对心理影响和知情同意的伦理担忧,在儿童牙科治疗中使用papoose板一直存在争议。虽然在一些地区限制或禁止使用,但在其他地区仍被接受用于治疗不合作或高度焦虑的儿童,特别是在紧急牙科治疗中。目的:本研究旨在比较至少3年前接受过papoose板牙科治疗的儿童(papoose板组)和从未接受过papoose板牙科治疗的儿童(对照组)的牙科焦虑水平。此外,在papoose board组中,研究检查了记得他们的papoose board经历的儿童(回忆组)和不记得的儿童(未回忆组)之间牙齿焦虑水平的差异。材料与方法:随机选取符合纳入标准和排除标准的7-11岁儿童90名,在某大学牙科医院使用改良儿童牙科焦虑量表(MCDASf)或通过视频电话对其进行牙科焦虑评估。使用卡方检验分析牙科焦虑水平与各变量之间的相关性。结果:该研究包括45名参与者,每个小组和对照组。在papoose board组中,16名儿童(35.6%)回忆起他们的papoose board经历,29名儿童(64.4%)没有,平均为5.2±1.61年。牙焦虑水平在papoose board组和对照组之间无显著差异(p = 0.833),召回组和未召回组之间也无显著差异(p = 0.608)。结论:在长期牙科焦虑方面,接受过papoose板治疗的儿童与未接受治疗的儿童,以及回忆起治疗经历的儿童与未接受治疗的儿童之间没有显著差异。如何引用本文:Sakulratchata R, Amornwanishsan S, Wongtawisombat T等人。接受和未接受Papoose Board治疗的儿童的长期牙科焦虑水平:一项回顾性队列试验研究。中华临床儿科杂志,2015;18(6):703-708。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term Dental Anxiety Levels in Children Treated with and without Papoose Board: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study.

Background: The use of the papoose board in pediatric dental treatment has been controversial due to ethical concerns about psychological impact and informed consent. Although its use is restricted or prohibited in some regions, it remains accepted in others for managing uncooperative or highly anxious children, particularly in emergency dental settings.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare dental anxiety levels in children who had undergone dental treatment using a papoose board at least 3 years earlier (papoose board group) with those who had never been treated with a papoose board (control group). Additionally, within the papoose board group, the study examined differences in dental anxiety levels between children who remembered their papoose board experience (recalled group) and those who did not (unrecalled group).

Materials and methods: Ninety children, aged 7-11 years, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomly selected and assessed for dental anxiety using the Modified Child Dental Anxiety Scale (MCDASf) at a university dental hospital or via video call. The correlation between dental anxiety levels and the variables was analyzed using Chi-square tests.

Results: The study included 45 participants in each of the papoose board and control groups. Within the papoose board group, 16 children (35.6%) recalled their papoose board experiences, while 29 children (64.4%) did not, with an average of 5.2 ± 1.61 years since the last experience. No significant difference was found in dental anxiety levels between the papoose board group and the control group (p = 0.833), nor between the recalled and unrecalled groups (p = 0.608).

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in long-term dental anxiety between children who had undergone treatment with a papoose board and those who had not, or between children who recalled the experience and those who did not.

How to cite this article: Sakulratchata R, Amornwanishsan S, Wongtawisombat T, et al. Long-term Dental Anxiety Levels in Children Treated with and without Papoose Board: A Retrospective Cohort Pilot Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(6):703-708.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信