基于Edgar Schein模型(审计方法)的安全文化评价新指标的建立。

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tswj/3166187
Davood Eskandari, Abbas Haghparast Ghomesheh, Mousa Jabbari, Abdollah Gholami, Omran Ahmadi
{"title":"基于Edgar Schein模型(审计方法)的安全文化评价新指标的建立。","authors":"Davood Eskandari, Abbas Haghparast Ghomesheh, Mousa Jabbari, Abdollah Gholami, Omran Ahmadi","doi":"10.1155/tswj/3166187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Over the past few decades, particularly following the Chernobyl incident, awareness of the importance of safety culture has increased significantly. Traditionally, safety culture has been assessed using questionnaires, with results often influenced by employees' psychological states. Therefore, the present study evaluates safety culture through an audit-based approach, employing performance indicators grounded in Edgar Schein's model. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> To identify the key factors contributing to the safety culture index, Edgar Schein's model was applied. Relevant indicators were derived across three levels: artifacts, espoused values, and basic assumptions. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), combined with expert evaluations, was used to determine the relative importance of these criteria. Finally, the company's safety culture index was quantitatively assessed using guide tables and the weighted contribution of each factor. <b>Results:</b> Then, 10 indicators were identified across the three levels of Schein's model: quality of documentation and procedures, employee involvement, management of professional competence, change management, organizational learning, openness and communication, prioritization of safety, managerial knowledge, safety perspectives, and attitudes toward mistakes. According to the FAHP results, prioritization of safety had the highest weight (0.157), while quality of documentation and procedures had the lowest weight (0.026) in the safety culture index. <b>Discussion:</b> An audit-based approach proves more effective than questionnaire methods for quantitatively assessing safety culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3166187"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a New Index to Assessing the Safety Culture Based on the Edgar Schein Model (Audit Approach).\",\"authors\":\"Davood Eskandari, Abbas Haghparast Ghomesheh, Mousa Jabbari, Abdollah Gholami, Omran Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/tswj/3166187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Over the past few decades, particularly following the Chernobyl incident, awareness of the importance of safety culture has increased significantly. Traditionally, safety culture has been assessed using questionnaires, with results often influenced by employees' psychological states. Therefore, the present study evaluates safety culture through an audit-based approach, employing performance indicators grounded in Edgar Schein's model. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> To identify the key factors contributing to the safety culture index, Edgar Schein's model was applied. Relevant indicators were derived across three levels: artifacts, espoused values, and basic assumptions. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), combined with expert evaluations, was used to determine the relative importance of these criteria. Finally, the company's safety culture index was quantitatively assessed using guide tables and the weighted contribution of each factor. <b>Results:</b> Then, 10 indicators were identified across the three levels of Schein's model: quality of documentation and procedures, employee involvement, management of professional competence, change management, organizational learning, openness and communication, prioritization of safety, managerial knowledge, safety perspectives, and attitudes toward mistakes. According to the FAHP results, prioritization of safety had the highest weight (0.157), while quality of documentation and procedures had the lowest weight (0.026) in the safety culture index. <b>Discussion:</b> An audit-based approach proves more effective than questionnaire methods for quantitatively assessing safety culture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"3166187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific World Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/3166187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/3166187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在过去的几十年里,特别是在切尔诺贝利事件之后,人们对安全文化重要性的认识显著提高。传统上,安全文化是通过问卷来评估的,结果往往受到员工心理状态的影响。因此,本研究通过基于审计的方法评估安全文化,采用基于埃德加·沙因模型的绩效指标。材料与方法:采用Edgar Schein模型确定影响安全文化指数的关键因素。相关的指标是在三个层次上得出的:人工制品、拥护的价值和基本假设。运用模糊层次分析法(FAHP),结合专家评价,确定各指标的相对重要性。最后,利用指导表和各因素的权重贡献对公司的安全文化指数进行定量评价。结果:在Schein模型的三个层次上,确定了10个指标:文件和程序质量、员工参与、专业能力管理、变革管理、组织学习、开放和沟通、安全优先级、管理知识、安全观点和对错误的态度。根据FAHP结果,安全优先级在安全文化指数中权重最高(0.157),而文件和程序质量的权重最低(0.026)。讨论:在定量评估安全文化方面,基于审计的方法被证明比问卷调查方法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a New Index to Assessing the Safety Culture Based on the Edgar Schein Model (Audit Approach).

Introduction: Over the past few decades, particularly following the Chernobyl incident, awareness of the importance of safety culture has increased significantly. Traditionally, safety culture has been assessed using questionnaires, with results often influenced by employees' psychological states. Therefore, the present study evaluates safety culture through an audit-based approach, employing performance indicators grounded in Edgar Schein's model. Materials and Methods: To identify the key factors contributing to the safety culture index, Edgar Schein's model was applied. Relevant indicators were derived across three levels: artifacts, espoused values, and basic assumptions. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP), combined with expert evaluations, was used to determine the relative importance of these criteria. Finally, the company's safety culture index was quantitatively assessed using guide tables and the weighted contribution of each factor. Results: Then, 10 indicators were identified across the three levels of Schein's model: quality of documentation and procedures, employee involvement, management of professional competence, change management, organizational learning, openness and communication, prioritization of safety, managerial knowledge, safety perspectives, and attitudes toward mistakes. According to the FAHP results, prioritization of safety had the highest weight (0.157), while quality of documentation and procedures had the lowest weight (0.026) in the safety culture index. Discussion: An audit-based approach proves more effective than questionnaire methods for quantitatively assessing safety culture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信