复杂临床病例中大型语言模型推理的临床评估。

Q3 Medicine
Vittorio De Vita, Bianca Destro Castaniti, Mariapia Vassalli, Lorenzo De Mori, Doriana Lacalaprice, Emanuele Arcà, Antonio Cristiano, Chiara Battipaglia, Pietro Eric Risuleo, Tommaso Dionisi, Francesco Andrea Causio
{"title":"复杂临床病例中大型语言模型推理的临床评估。","authors":"Vittorio De Vita, Bianca Destro Castaniti, Mariapia Vassalli, Lorenzo De Mori, Doriana Lacalaprice, Emanuele Arcà, Antonio Cristiano, Chiara Battipaglia, Pietro Eric Risuleo, Tommaso Dionisi, Francesco Andrea Causio","doi":"10.1701/4573.45794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) show promise in explicit reasoning for complex medical fields like psychiatry. This study assessed the clinical validity of Gemini's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in 10 complex psychiatric cases, evaluated by specialists using six metrics. Results indicate high performance (average score ≥4.26/5), especially in step sufficiency and factual accuracy, suggesting that CoT reasoning by LLMs can support transparent and detailed clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":"116 10","pages":"599-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valutazione del ragionamento clinico dei reasoning large language models su casi clinici complessi.\",\"authors\":\"Vittorio De Vita, Bianca Destro Castaniti, Mariapia Vassalli, Lorenzo De Mori, Doriana Lacalaprice, Emanuele Arcà, Antonio Cristiano, Chiara Battipaglia, Pietro Eric Risuleo, Tommaso Dionisi, Francesco Andrea Causio\",\"doi\":\"10.1701/4573.45794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Large language models (LLMs) show promise in explicit reasoning for complex medical fields like psychiatry. This study assessed the clinical validity of Gemini's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in 10 complex psychiatric cases, evaluated by specialists using six metrics. Results indicate high performance (average score ≥4.26/5), especially in step sufficiency and factual accuracy, suggesting that CoT reasoning by LLMs can support transparent and detailed clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recenti progressi in medicina\",\"volume\":\"116 10\",\"pages\":\"599-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recenti progressi in medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1701/4573.45794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4573.45794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型(llm)在精神病学等复杂医学领域的显式推理中显示出前景。本研究评估了10个复杂精神病例中双子座思维链推理的临床有效性,由专家使用6个指标进行评估。结果表明,LLMs的CoT推理在步骤充分性和事实准确性方面表现优异(平均得分≥4.26/5),表明LLMs的CoT推理可以支持透明、详细的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Valutazione del ragionamento clinico dei reasoning large language models su casi clinici complessi.

Large language models (LLMs) show promise in explicit reasoning for complex medical fields like psychiatry. This study assessed the clinical validity of Gemini's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in 10 complex psychiatric cases, evaluated by specialists using six metrics. Results indicate high performance (average score ≥4.26/5), especially in step sufficiency and factual accuracy, suggesting that CoT reasoning by LLMs can support transparent and detailed clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信