GPT-4在回答皮肤病患者的问题时的准确性和可靠性:一项关于人工智能在数字病人护理中的作用的研究。

Q3 Medicine
Tiziana Pinciroli, Luigi De Angelis, Francesco Andrea Causio, Antonio Iacuzio, Vittorio Grieco, Emanuele Agrimi, Francesco Traglia, Maria Rosa Valetto, Pietro Dri, Luigi Naldi
{"title":"GPT-4在回答皮肤病患者的问题时的准确性和可靠性:一项关于人工智能在数字病人护理中的作用的研究。","authors":"Tiziana Pinciroli, Luigi De Angelis, Francesco Andrea Causio, Antonio Iacuzio, Vittorio Grieco, Emanuele Agrimi, Francesco Traglia, Maria Rosa Valetto, Pietro Dri, Luigi Naldi","doi":"10.1701/4573.45793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using large language models (LLMs) to answer patients' questions is promising but calls for caution and careful validation. We assessed GPT-4o mini-generated answers to dermatology-related patient questions and compared them to specialists' answers. While GPT-4o mini provided clearer and more updated information, some answers contained inaccuracies that could lead to risky patient management. Future work should explore retrieval techniques from reliable sources to enhance safety and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":"116 10","pages":"597-598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuratezza e affidabilità di GPT-4 nel rispondere alle domande dei pazienti su malattie dermatologiche: uno studio sul ruolo dell’intelligenza artificiale nell’assistenza digitale ai pazienti.\",\"authors\":\"Tiziana Pinciroli, Luigi De Angelis, Francesco Andrea Causio, Antonio Iacuzio, Vittorio Grieco, Emanuele Agrimi, Francesco Traglia, Maria Rosa Valetto, Pietro Dri, Luigi Naldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1701/4573.45793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using large language models (LLMs) to answer patients' questions is promising but calls for caution and careful validation. We assessed GPT-4o mini-generated answers to dermatology-related patient questions and compared them to specialists' answers. While GPT-4o mini provided clearer and more updated information, some answers contained inaccuracies that could lead to risky patient management. Future work should explore retrieval techniques from reliable sources to enhance safety and accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recenti progressi in medicina\",\"volume\":\"116 10\",\"pages\":\"597-598\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recenti progressi in medicina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1701/4573.45793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4573.45793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用大型语言模型(llm)来回答患者的问题是有希望的,但需要谨慎和仔细的验证。我们评估了gpt - 40对皮肤病学相关患者问题的迷你生成答案,并将其与专家的答案进行了比较。虽然gpt - 40mini提供了更清晰和更新的信息,但一些答案包含可能导致患者管理风险的不准确信息。未来的工作应探索可靠来源的检索技术,以提高安全性和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuratezza e affidabilità di GPT-4 nel rispondere alle domande dei pazienti su malattie dermatologiche: uno studio sul ruolo dell’intelligenza artificiale nell’assistenza digitale ai pazienti.

Using large language models (LLMs) to answer patients' questions is promising but calls for caution and careful validation. We assessed GPT-4o mini-generated answers to dermatology-related patient questions and compared them to specialists' answers. While GPT-4o mini provided clearer and more updated information, some answers contained inaccuracies that could lead to risky patient management. Future work should explore retrieval techniques from reliable sources to enhance safety and accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信