Emanuele Tommasino, François Ducray, Antoine Seyve, Thiebaud Picard, Anna Martin, Delphine Gamondes, Emilien Jupin Delevaux, Marc Hermier, Yves Berthezene, Alexandre Bani-Sadr
{"title":"cro2 (DSC-PW)灌注参数有助于区分胶质母细胞瘤患者的进展和假进展。","authors":"Emanuele Tommasino, François Ducray, Antoine Seyve, Thiebaud Picard, Anna Martin, Delphine Gamondes, Emilien Jupin Delevaux, Marc Hermier, Yves Berthezene, Alexandre Bani-Sadr","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02103-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CMRO<sub>2</sub> (cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen) in differentiating between pseudoprogression and true tumour progression in patients with glioblastoma (GB) following chemoradiotherapy and to compare its performance with rCBV (relative cerebral blood volume).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This diagnostic accuracy study included two cohorts: an analysis group (32 patients, 19 progression, 13 pseudoprogression) and a validation group (52 patients, 35 progression, 17 pseudoprogression). Patients underwent MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) and DCE (dynamic contrast-enhanced) perfusion imaging. CMRO<sub>2</sub> and rCBV thresholds were evaluated to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Inclusion criteria were GB diagnosis, standard chemoradiotherapy, and new or enlarged enhancing lesions on MRI within one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analysis group (mean age, 60.8 ± 8 years), CMRO<sub>2</sub> showed superior performance with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.77-0.98), sensitivity of 84.2%, and specificity of 83.3%. rCBV achieved an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.88). In the validation group (mean age, 63 ± 7 years), CMRO<sub>2</sub> maintained an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.98), while rCBV reached an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.91). The DeLong test confirmed CMRO<sub>2</sub>'s significantly higher performance (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMRO<sub>2</sub> demonstrates higher diagnostic performance than rCBV in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progression in GB patients. Despite limitations, CMRO<sub>2</sub> shows promise as a non-invasive biomarker, warranting further multicentre validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CMRO<sub>2</sub> (DSC-PW) perfusion parameter helps to distinguish between progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuele Tommasino, François Ducray, Antoine Seyve, Thiebaud Picard, Anna Martin, Delphine Gamondes, Emilien Jupin Delevaux, Marc Hermier, Yves Berthezene, Alexandre Bani-Sadr\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-025-02103-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CMRO<sub>2</sub> (cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen) in differentiating between pseudoprogression and true tumour progression in patients with glioblastoma (GB) following chemoradiotherapy and to compare its performance with rCBV (relative cerebral blood volume).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This diagnostic accuracy study included two cohorts: an analysis group (32 patients, 19 progression, 13 pseudoprogression) and a validation group (52 patients, 35 progression, 17 pseudoprogression). Patients underwent MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) and DCE (dynamic contrast-enhanced) perfusion imaging. CMRO<sub>2</sub> and rCBV thresholds were evaluated to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Inclusion criteria were GB diagnosis, standard chemoradiotherapy, and new or enlarged enhancing lesions on MRI within one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the analysis group (mean age, 60.8 ± 8 years), CMRO<sub>2</sub> showed superior performance with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.77-0.98), sensitivity of 84.2%, and specificity of 83.3%. rCBV achieved an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.88). In the validation group (mean age, 63 ± 7 years), CMRO<sub>2</sub> maintained an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.98), while rCBV reached an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.91). The DeLong test confirmed CMRO<sub>2</sub>'s significantly higher performance (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CMRO<sub>2</sub> demonstrates higher diagnostic performance than rCBV in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progression in GB patients. Despite limitations, CMRO<sub>2</sub> shows promise as a non-invasive biomarker, warranting further multicentre validation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02103-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02103-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价cro2(脑氧代谢率)在胶质母细胞瘤(GB)放化疗后鉴别肿瘤假进展与真进展中的诊断准确性,并与rCBV(相对脑血容量)进行比较。材料和方法:该诊断准确性研究包括两个队列:分析组(32例患者,19例进展,13例假进展)和验证组(52例患者,35例进展,17例假进展)。患者行MRI(磁共振成像)、DSC(动态敏感性对比)和DCE(动态对比增强)灌注成像。评估cmor2和rCBV阈值以计算敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。纳入标准为GB诊断,标准放化疗,一年内MRI新发或扩大强化病灶。结果:在分析组(平均年龄60.8±8岁)中,ccro2表现出较好的疗效,AUC为0.89 (95% CI 0.77 ~ 0.98),敏感性为84.2%,特异性为83.3%。rCBV的AUC为0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.88)。在验证组(平均年龄63±7岁)中,cmor2的AUC维持在0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.98), rCBV的AUC达到0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.91)。DeLong检验证实cmor2的性能显著提高(p = 0.04)。结论:cmor2在鉴别GB患者的假进展和真进展方面比rCBV具有更高的诊断效能。尽管存在局限性,但cmor2作为一种非侵入性生物标志物显示出前景,需要进一步的多中心验证。
CMRO2 (DSC-PW) perfusion parameter helps to distinguish between progression and pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma.
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CMRO2 (cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen) in differentiating between pseudoprogression and true tumour progression in patients with glioblastoma (GB) following chemoradiotherapy and to compare its performance with rCBV (relative cerebral blood volume).
Materials and methods: This diagnostic accuracy study included two cohorts: an analysis group (32 patients, 19 progression, 13 pseudoprogression) and a validation group (52 patients, 35 progression, 17 pseudoprogression). Patients underwent MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) with DSC (dynamic susceptibility contrast) and DCE (dynamic contrast-enhanced) perfusion imaging. CMRO2 and rCBV thresholds were evaluated to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Inclusion criteria were GB diagnosis, standard chemoradiotherapy, and new or enlarged enhancing lesions on MRI within one year.
Results: In the analysis group (mean age, 60.8 ± 8 years), CMRO2 showed superior performance with an AUC of 0.89 (95% CI 0.77-0.98), sensitivity of 84.2%, and specificity of 83.3%. rCBV achieved an AUC of 0.63 (95% CI 0.42-0.88). In the validation group (mean age, 63 ± 7 years), CMRO2 maintained an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.98), while rCBV reached an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.91). The DeLong test confirmed CMRO2's significantly higher performance (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: CMRO2 demonstrates higher diagnostic performance than rCBV in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progression in GB patients. Despite limitations, CMRO2 shows promise as a non-invasive biomarker, warranting further multicentre validation.
期刊介绍:
Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.