Orr Shauly, Makenna Ash, Shannon Su, Tola Ebunlomo, Melika Deaton, Susan Doh, Joseph S Khouri, Albert Losken
{"title":"使用TIGR补片直接植入乳房重建术的早期结果。","authors":"Orr Shauly, Makenna Ash, Shannon Su, Tola Ebunlomo, Melika Deaton, Susan Doh, Joseph S Khouri, Albert Losken","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction often uses soft tissue support to improve outcomes and reduce implant migration. Synthetic meshes, such as TIGR Matrix, have emerged as potential alternatives to biological materials due to lower costs and complication rates. This study reviewed early outcomes using TIGR Matrix in immediate DTI reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction with TIGR Matrix between November 2023 and June 2024 across 2 institutions. Inclusion criteria included DTI reconstruction with at least 6 months of follow-up. Data collected included demographics, oncological and reconstructive details, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using MATLAB with <i>t</i> tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (109 breasts) met inclusion criteria. The cohort included 42.2% nipple-sparing, 40.4% skin-sparing, and 11.0% Goldilocks mastectomies. The mean patient age was 52 years. The mean time to first postoperative follow-up was 8.3 days. Major complications included 6 hematomas (5.5%), 3 seromas (2.8%), 2 infections (1.8%), and 3 explantations (2.8%). Eleven (10.1%) patients required reoperation due to complications including infection, necrosis, or residual disease. Minor complications (delayed wound healing, eschar) were observed in 17.4% of breasts. The overall complication rate excluding minor events was 12.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TIGR Matrix demonstrates an acceptable early complication profile in DTI breast reconstruction and may serve as a cost-effective alternative to acellular dermal matrices. Additional studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes and comparative effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 10","pages":"e7170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Outcomes Using TIGR Mesh in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Orr Shauly, Makenna Ash, Shannon Su, Tola Ebunlomo, Melika Deaton, Susan Doh, Joseph S Khouri, Albert Losken\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000007170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction often uses soft tissue support to improve outcomes and reduce implant migration. Synthetic meshes, such as TIGR Matrix, have emerged as potential alternatives to biological materials due to lower costs and complication rates. This study reviewed early outcomes using TIGR Matrix in immediate DTI reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction with TIGR Matrix between November 2023 and June 2024 across 2 institutions. Inclusion criteria included DTI reconstruction with at least 6 months of follow-up. Data collected included demographics, oncological and reconstructive details, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using MATLAB with <i>t</i> tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients (109 breasts) met inclusion criteria. The cohort included 42.2% nipple-sparing, 40.4% skin-sparing, and 11.0% Goldilocks mastectomies. The mean patient age was 52 years. The mean time to first postoperative follow-up was 8.3 days. Major complications included 6 hematomas (5.5%), 3 seromas (2.8%), 2 infections (1.8%), and 3 explantations (2.8%). Eleven (10.1%) patients required reoperation due to complications including infection, necrosis, or residual disease. Minor complications (delayed wound healing, eschar) were observed in 17.4% of breasts. The overall complication rate excluding minor events was 12.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TIGR Matrix demonstrates an acceptable early complication profile in DTI breast reconstruction and may serve as a cost-effective alternative to acellular dermal matrices. Additional studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes and comparative effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"e7170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12487947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000007170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Early Outcomes Using TIGR Mesh in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Background: Direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction often uses soft tissue support to improve outcomes and reduce implant migration. Synthetic meshes, such as TIGR Matrix, have emerged as potential alternatives to biological materials due to lower costs and complication rates. This study reviewed early outcomes using TIGR Matrix in immediate DTI reconstruction.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction with TIGR Matrix between November 2023 and June 2024 across 2 institutions. Inclusion criteria included DTI reconstruction with at least 6 months of follow-up. Data collected included demographics, oncological and reconstructive details, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Statistical analysis was performed using MATLAB with t tests and χ2 tests.
Results: Seventy-one patients (109 breasts) met inclusion criteria. The cohort included 42.2% nipple-sparing, 40.4% skin-sparing, and 11.0% Goldilocks mastectomies. The mean patient age was 52 years. The mean time to first postoperative follow-up was 8.3 days. Major complications included 6 hematomas (5.5%), 3 seromas (2.8%), 2 infections (1.8%), and 3 explantations (2.8%). Eleven (10.1%) patients required reoperation due to complications including infection, necrosis, or residual disease. Minor complications (delayed wound healing, eschar) were observed in 17.4% of breasts. The overall complication rate excluding minor events was 12.8%.
Conclusions: TIGR Matrix demonstrates an acceptable early complication profile in DTI breast reconstruction and may serve as a cost-effective alternative to acellular dermal matrices. Additional studies are needed to assess long-term outcomes and comparative effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.