{"title":"儿童介入心脏病技术的差距:一项调查评估。","authors":"Daniel Levi, Nicholas Sharawy, Tim Moran","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-04046-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a follow-up to the device needs survey conducted and published in 2015, an updated survey was repeated in 2024 to evaluate gaps in device and equipment availability for pediatric congenital interventional cardiologists. Over 200 US pediatric interventional cardiologists were contacted directly via email. The Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC) and the Pediatric and Congenital Interventional Cardiovascular Society (PICS) distributed the survey to its membership in the United States (US). Respondents cited a need for new devices which differed significantly from the 2015 survey. \"Biodegradable Stents\" (37%), \"PDA Stents\" (patent ductus arteriosus, 21%), and \"Pulmonary Artery Flow Restrictors\" (21%) were ranked as the top three most needed devices. Devices that were suspected to offer the greatest potential reduction in mortality were \"Flow Restrictors\" (30%), \"PDA Stents\" (18%), and \"Biodegradable Stents\" (6%). The respondents also prioritized the needs for devices not available in the US or removed from the market. With many startups and larger companies interested in the congenital interventional space, the results of this survey are intended to help guide tailored device development for the most pressing needs of the congenital interventional cardiology community.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaps in Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Technology: A Survey Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Levi, Nicholas Sharawy, Tim Moran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00246-025-04046-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As a follow-up to the device needs survey conducted and published in 2015, an updated survey was repeated in 2024 to evaluate gaps in device and equipment availability for pediatric congenital interventional cardiologists. Over 200 US pediatric interventional cardiologists were contacted directly via email. The Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC) and the Pediatric and Congenital Interventional Cardiovascular Society (PICS) distributed the survey to its membership in the United States (US). Respondents cited a need for new devices which differed significantly from the 2015 survey. \\\"Biodegradable Stents\\\" (37%), \\\"PDA Stents\\\" (patent ductus arteriosus, 21%), and \\\"Pulmonary Artery Flow Restrictors\\\" (21%) were ranked as the top three most needed devices. Devices that were suspected to offer the greatest potential reduction in mortality were \\\"Flow Restrictors\\\" (30%), \\\"PDA Stents\\\" (18%), and \\\"Biodegradable Stents\\\" (6%). The respondents also prioritized the needs for devices not available in the US or removed from the market. With many startups and larger companies interested in the congenital interventional space, the results of this survey are intended to help guide tailored device development for the most pressing needs of the congenital interventional cardiology community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-04046-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-04046-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gaps in Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Technology: A Survey Assessment.
As a follow-up to the device needs survey conducted and published in 2015, an updated survey was repeated in 2024 to evaluate gaps in device and equipment availability for pediatric congenital interventional cardiologists. Over 200 US pediatric interventional cardiologists were contacted directly via email. The Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC) and the Pediatric and Congenital Interventional Cardiovascular Society (PICS) distributed the survey to its membership in the United States (US). Respondents cited a need for new devices which differed significantly from the 2015 survey. "Biodegradable Stents" (37%), "PDA Stents" (patent ductus arteriosus, 21%), and "Pulmonary Artery Flow Restrictors" (21%) were ranked as the top three most needed devices. Devices that were suspected to offer the greatest potential reduction in mortality were "Flow Restrictors" (30%), "PDA Stents" (18%), and "Biodegradable Stents" (6%). The respondents also prioritized the needs for devices not available in the US or removed from the market. With many startups and larger companies interested in the congenital interventional space, the results of this survey are intended to help guide tailored device development for the most pressing needs of the congenital interventional cardiology community.
期刊介绍:
The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.