Sarah Tenberg, Lutz Vogt, Steffen Müller, Daniel Niederer
{"title":"德国治疗师上肢卒中治疗中电刺激的知识、使用和障碍:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Sarah Tenberg, Lutz Vogt, Steffen Müller, Daniel Niederer","doi":"10.1155/np/4697720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective therapeutic method for improving upper limb motor function after stroke, yet its usage among occupational and physical therapists in Germany remains uncertain. The aim of the study is to investigate the knowledge of, frequency of use, and barriers to electrical stimulation use in stroke rehabilitation. <b>Methods:</b> An online survey was conducted among German occupational and physical therapists working with stroke patients. Data were analyzed for frequency distributions, and associations between electrical stimulation usage and individual/organizational factors were assessed using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact tests. <b>Results:</b> A total of <i>n</i> = 111 participants completed the survey (57 occupational and 54 physical therapists). Almost half (45%) reported regular electrical stimulation use, with 57% wanting to increase it. Use was higher among therapists with additional training (85% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.041), belief in electrical stimulation effectiveness during acute (87% vs. 59%, <i>p</i>=0.041) and early subacute stages (81% vs. 47%, <i>p</i>=0.027), sufficient time (78% vs. 60%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and device access (80% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.006). Therapists with over 10 years of experience used electrical stimulation less frequently (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although electrical stimulation shows promise in rehabilitation, further research is needed to assess the resources-such as time, equipment, and therapist training-required for its effective integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4697720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge, Use, and Barriers to Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Stroke Therapy Among German Therapists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Tenberg, Lutz Vogt, Steffen Müller, Daniel Niederer\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/np/4697720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective therapeutic method for improving upper limb motor function after stroke, yet its usage among occupational and physical therapists in Germany remains uncertain. The aim of the study is to investigate the knowledge of, frequency of use, and barriers to electrical stimulation use in stroke rehabilitation. <b>Methods:</b> An online survey was conducted among German occupational and physical therapists working with stroke patients. Data were analyzed for frequency distributions, and associations between electrical stimulation usage and individual/organizational factors were assessed using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact tests. <b>Results:</b> A total of <i>n</i> = 111 participants completed the survey (57 occupational and 54 physical therapists). Almost half (45%) reported regular electrical stimulation use, with 57% wanting to increase it. Use was higher among therapists with additional training (85% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.041), belief in electrical stimulation effectiveness during acute (87% vs. 59%, <i>p</i>=0.041) and early subacute stages (81% vs. 47%, <i>p</i>=0.027), sufficient time (78% vs. 60%, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and device access (80% vs. 44%, <i>p</i>=0.006). Therapists with over 10 years of experience used electrical stimulation less frequently (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> Although electrical stimulation shows promise in rehabilitation, further research is needed to assess the resources-such as time, equipment, and therapist training-required for its effective integration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"4697720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12488299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/np/4697720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/np/4697720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge, Use, and Barriers to Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Stroke Therapy Among German Therapists: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Background and Purpose: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective therapeutic method for improving upper limb motor function after stroke, yet its usage among occupational and physical therapists in Germany remains uncertain. The aim of the study is to investigate the knowledge of, frequency of use, and barriers to electrical stimulation use in stroke rehabilitation. Methods: An online survey was conducted among German occupational and physical therapists working with stroke patients. Data were analyzed for frequency distributions, and associations between electrical stimulation usage and individual/organizational factors were assessed using Chi-Square or Fisher's exact tests. Results: A total of n = 111 participants completed the survey (57 occupational and 54 physical therapists). Almost half (45%) reported regular electrical stimulation use, with 57% wanting to increase it. Use was higher among therapists with additional training (85% vs. 44%, p=0.041), belief in electrical stimulation effectiveness during acute (87% vs. 59%, p=0.041) and early subacute stages (81% vs. 47%, p=0.027), sufficient time (78% vs. 60%, p < 0.001), and device access (80% vs. 44%, p=0.006). Therapists with over 10 years of experience used electrical stimulation less frequently (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Although electrical stimulation shows promise in rehabilitation, further research is needed to assess the resources-such as time, equipment, and therapist training-required for its effective integration.
期刊介绍:
Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.